Sociological Insights on Deviance: Theories and Perspectives
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Chapter 8 Deviance
Chapter Outline • Defining Deviance • Sociological Theories of Deviance • Forms of Deviance • Deviance in Global Perspective
Defining Deviance • Sociologists define deviance as behavior that violates expected rules and norms. • The sociological definition of deviance: • Stresses social context, not individual behavior. • Recognizes that not all behaviors are judged similarly by all groups. • Recognizes that established rules and norms are socially created, not just morally decreed or individually imposed.
Functionalist Theories of Deviance • Deviance occurs when people's attachment to social bonds is diminished. • Norms are meaningless unless there is deviance from the norms. • Group coherence comes from a common definition of deviant behavior.
Durkheim: The Study of Suicide Three types of suicide: • Anomic - disintegrating forces in society make an individual feel lost and alone. • Altruistic - for the sake of a higher cause. • Egoistic - occurs when people feel totally detached from society.
Merton: Structural Strain Theory Categories of adaptation to social systems: • Conformists accept society's goals and the means to achieve them. • Innovators develop creative means to achieve goals set by society. • Ritualists accept the means to the goals, but not the goals.
Merton: Structural Strain Theory Categories of adaptation to social systems: • Retreatists accept neither the goals nor the means of the society. • Politically rebellious reject the goals and the means of society and substitute other goals and means.
Functionalism: Weaknesses Does not explain: • How norms of deviance are first established. • Why some behaviors are defined as normative and others as illegitimate. • How the inequities in society are reflected in patterns of deviance.
Conflict Theory of Deviance • Links deviance to power relationships and social inequality. • Crime committed among the poorest is the result of economic status. • Elite deviants can hide their crimes and avoid criminal labels.
Conflict Theory of Deviance • The law protects the dominant class and regulates populations that pose a threat to affluent interests. • The power to define deviance confers a degree of social control to be used against less powerful people.
Conflict Theory: Strengths and Weaknesses • Provides insight into power relationships in definition, identification, and handling of deviance. • Describes different systems of justice for disadvantaged and privileged groups. • Less effective in explaining deviance other than crime.
Symbolic InteractionTheories of Deviance • People behave as they do because of the meanings attributed to situations. • Deviance originates in the interaction between groups and is defined by society’s reaction to certain behaviors.
Symbolic InteractionTheories of Deviance W.I. Thomas and the Chicago School: • Situational analysis: deviance is a normal response to social conditions in which people find themselves. • People’s actions must be understood in social, not individualized frameworks.
Symbolic InteractionTheories of Deviance Differential Association • Deviant behavior is learned through interaction with others. • People pass on deviant expectations through their social groups and networks.
Symbolic InteractionTheories of Deviance Labeling Theory • Responses of others is most significant in deviance. • A person may become deviant because of a label, even if he/she did not engage in deviant behavior.
Forms of Deviance: Mental Illness • Sociological explanations look to social systems that define, identify, and treat mental illness. • Functionalists - by recognizing mental illness, society upholds values about conforming behavior. • Symbolic interactionists – the mentally ill are victims of societal reactions to their behavior. • Labeling and conflict theory - people with fewest resources are most likely to be labeled mentally ill.
Social Stigmas • A stigma is an attribute that is socially devalued and discredited. • People with stigmas are stereotyped and defined only in terms of their presumed deviance. • They may try to hide their stigma, isolating themselves from communities where they can get support.