1 / 8

Site Selection in the Oklahoma Mesonet

Site Selection in the Oklahoma Mesonet. Mark A. Shafer Oklahoma Climatological Survey University of Oklahoma. Step 1: Guidance. Site Standards Committee Undisturbed sites Representative of the region Flat and unobstructed Accessible for maintenance Uniform vegetation

anastasia-mosley
Télécharger la présentation

Site Selection in the Oklahoma Mesonet

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Site Selection in the Oklahoma Mesonet Mark A. Shafer Oklahoma Climatological Survey University of Oklahoma

  2. Step 1: Guidance • Site Standards Committee • Undisturbed sites • Representative of the region • Flat and unobstructed • Accessible for maintenance • Uniform vegetation • Site Selection Committee • Specific site characteristics • WMO standards

  3. Step 2: Design • Requirements • At least one site per county • Agricultural experiment stations • Other agency needs • Even station spacing • Location of other networks • Fill in gaps in coverage • Co-location with other network sites for inter-comparison • Local interest / needs • Trade-offs: representative sites, communications

  4. Step 3: Picking Sites • Finding local contacts: • Statewide organizations with county offices (i.e., OSU Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma Conservation Commission, State Emergency Management) • Contact local officials to seek assistance, clarify guidelines • Local officials identified several possible sites, followed-up by staff site visits with local official • Learning process as we went

  5. Step 4: Paperwork • Land-Use agreements • Limits liability and establishes 90-day notice • Legal uncertainties: who signed for the universities? • Changes to agreement – especially to the “hold harmless” clause (mostly federal sites) • FCC licensing • six at a time! • FAA clearance (on or near airports) • Environmental Assessments

  6. Results • 108-station network actually installed • Minimal clustering • usually on the basis of other requirements (i.e., experiment stations) • Privately-owned rural rangeland or grassland usually best sites

  7. http://www.mesonet.ou.edu

  8. Results • 108-station network actually installed • Minimal clustering • usually on the basis of other requirements (i.e., experiment stations) • Privately-owned rural rangeland or grassland usually best sites • Local enthusiasm underestimated • Sites readily offered, often faster than staff could visit areas • Landowners content – only six stations moved since installation (3 on same owner’s land) • 2 because of land-use change • 2 for research needs • 2 for improving site characteristics

More Related