1 / 25

Atomic Structural Response to External Strain for AGNRs

Atomic Structural Response to External Strain for AGNRs. KITPC Program—Molecular Junctions. Wenfu Liao & Guanghui Zhou. Supported by NSFC under Grant No. 10974052. CONTET. I. Background Bond Variation for AGNRs under Uniaxial Strain III. Summary. I. Backgroud.

annice
Télécharger la présentation

Atomic Structural Response to External Strain for AGNRs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Atomic Structural Response to External Strain for AGNRs KITPC Program—Molecular Junctions Wenfu Liao & Guanghui Zhou Supported by NSFC under Grant No. 10974052

  2. CONTET • I. Background • Bond Variation for AGNRs • under Uniaxial Strain • III. Summary

  3. I. Backgroud tight-binding electron energy dispersion of graphene • Gapless • Zero band mass • Electron-hole symmetry • Pair creation • Chiral (Pseudospin) • Berry phase • No back-scattering

  4. MaterialforNovel Devices? 1. Typical speed 2. Huge current density 3. Large mean free path (high conductivity) 4. Large phase coherence lengths (coherent electronic circuits) 5. Easily cutting the sheet into nanoribbons (nanoscaled molecular electronic devices) 6. Strong field effect (metallic FET) 7. Ballistic transport up to room temperature 8. High-strength composites 9. Spin-valve, spin-qubit and hydrogen storage

  5. Open and/or tune an energy gap ?!— gap engineering (manipulation) 1. Finite size graphene nanoribbons—GNRs i. quasi-1D nature (a new type of quantum wires) ii. similar to carbon nanotubes (CNTs) iii. building blocks for nanoelectronic devices 2. Disorders (defects, impurity, …) 3. External fields (EM-field, etc.)

  6. 4. Multi-layers 5. Mechanically !?— “strain engineering ” Strain, even if it does not generate gaps, can also introduce strong anisotropies in the atomic structure and charge transport that can be used for applications ! Among all these methods, strain may be one of the most competitive candidates to exercise due to its continuous tunability and easiness performance even at nano-scale.

  7. (1) Single-walled CNTs under strain

  8. Small band-gap semiconducting (or quasimetallic) nanotubes exhibit the largest resistance changes and piezoresistive gauge factors under axial strains.

  9. Photoluminescence Measurement Maki et al, Nano Lett. 7, 890 (2007)

  10. (2) Graphene under strain

  11. Nano. Lett. 10, 3486 (2010)

  12. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 023112 (2011)

  13. Band gap as a function of strain for AGNR with different width Band gap as a function of strain for ZGNR with different width • Questions: • Variation of atomic structure, bond length and angle? • What is the distribution of the applied strain? Which part of bonds afford the force mostly? • Nanomechanical detector (sensor) design?

  14. II. Bond variation for AGNRs under a strain AC-strain ZZ-strain

  15. Band distribution for supercells of asymmetric 6- and 8-AGNR

  16. Band distribution for supercell of symmetric 7-AGNR

  17. Table of bond lengths for 6-, 7- and 8-AGNR • AC-strain is mostly afforded by the central region bonds while ZZ-strain is afforded by the edge region ones. • AC-strain elongates all bond while ZZ-strain only elongates most bond but a small part of bond lengths are compressed.

  18. Isosurface charge density for optimized supercells

  19. Percentage of varied bonds for N-AGNRs under a strain N-AGNRs can be classified into 3 types according to their structural response to a strain: symmetric 2n-, asymmetric (4n+1)- and (4n+3)-AGNRs. After doing a large amount of calculations for many AGNRs we conclude a general rule. • Asymmetric 2n-AGNRs show 2n types of bonds, while symmetric (4n+1)/(4n+3)-AGNRs present only (3n+1)/(3n+2) types of bonds. • (4n+1)/(4n+3)-AGNRs trend to be more stable/unstable against • strain as n increases, amongwhich the narrowest 7-AGNR is the most stable one againstexternal strain.

  20. Symmetric AGNRs are better building block for electronic circuits and devices for stability consideration, while asymmetric ones may be useful in electromechanical nanodevices, such as force sensor , etc.

  21. III. Summary 1. Strained GNRs — detailed relation between atomic and electronic structures? 2. Electron level explain for bond variation . 3. Predicted atomic and electronic structures can be observed experimentally? 4. Strained GNRs can used to design the nano-electromechanical devices and opto-electronic devices?

  22. Thanks for your attention !!!

More Related