1 / 27

Alternative Feeds

Alternative Feeds. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Oklahoma State University. Supplemental Feeding is Recommended for Grazing Cattle When:. Correcting for nutritional deficiency Increased performance is desired Stretching forage is necessary. Traditional Supplements.

applewhite
Télécharger la présentation

Alternative Feeds

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Alternative Feeds Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Oklahoma State University

  2. Supplemental Feeding is Recommended for Grazing Cattle When: • Correcting for nutritional deficiency • Increased performance is desired • Stretching forage is necessary

  3. Traditional Supplements • Commercial products • Alfalfa hay • Corn, grain sorghum, or wheat • Cottonseed or soybean meal

  4. Access to Alternative Feeds Has Increased Over the Past Few Years • By-products of grain and/or oilseed milling, fermentation products, bakeries, etc. • Common examples: Wheat midds, corn gluten feed, soybean hulls • Less common examples: Bakery waste products, bean sprouts, peanut skins

  5. Digestible vs Nondigestible Fiber Sources • Digestible fiber energy sources • Soybean hulls • Wheat middlings • Corn gluten feed • Distillers dried grains • Rice bran • Indigestible fiber • Cotton seed hulls • Rice hulls • Peanut hulls

  6. Considerations • Product variability • Palatability • Moisture • Protein • Protein degradability • Minerals

  7. Ash Content of Selected Alternative Feeds Source: Dairy One

  8. Iron Content of Selected Alternative Feeds Iron requirement in total daily ration = 50 ppm Source: Dairy One

  9. Considerations • Availability • Seasonal • Freight - volume and cost • Facilities and equipment • Total nutrition program evaluation is necessary. Blending of products is frequently required. • Feed companies are providing services and products to compliment the use of many of these feeds

  10. Considerations • Less risk of digestive upset due to over consumption compared to grain • Mineral considerations • Evaluate Ca:P ratio (P usually too high)

  11. Phosphorus Content of Selected Alternative Feeds Range in P requirements for cattle Source: Dairy One

  12. Considerations • Less risk of digestive upset due to over consumption compared to grain • Mineral considerations • Evaluate Ca:P ratio (P usually too high) • Generally good sources of trace minerals although extremely variable and a complimentary supplement will be required

  13. Pelleting Costs $8 -$20 per ton extra Reduces dust Improves flow and density Reduces freight cost “Commodity” feeds are generally not available in cube form Considerations

  14. Barley Malt Sprout Pellets • By-product of beer brewing process • Palatable feed • Considerable fiber from hulls • High phosphorous and sulfur content • Potential sulfur toxicity problems

  15. Corn Gluten Feed • By-product of high fructose corn syrup production • Highly rumen degradable protein source • Palatability variable with grazing cattle • Energy value equal to corn when fed at 0.5% of body weight • Potential sulfur toxicity problems

  16. Dried Distillers Grains • By-product of the distilling industry • Low in ruminal degradable protein 30-50% • As acid detergent insoluble nitrogen (ADIN) increases, undegradable protein increases • Considered a protein supplement, but energy value equal to corn gluten feed • Limit to 0.5% of weight due to fat content

  17. Hominy Feed • By-product of hominy grits, and corn meal milling process • Palatable feed • Should be analyzed for fat content • Limit to 0.5% of weight due to fat content

  18. Rice Bran • By-product of the rice milling industry • High fat content can cause rancidity problems during summer storage • Small particle size, starch, and fat content present potential digestive problems • Limit to 0.5% of weight due to fat content

  19. Soybeans • Damaged beans (drought, frost, etc.) have good feeding value • Damaged soybeans vary in nutrient content • Drought stressed beans should be cracked or rolled • Not for calves < 300 lbs., or cattle consuming urea containing supplements • Limit to 0.3% of body weight of grazing cattle • Never feed to cows within 60 d of breeding season

  20. Soybean Hulls • By-product of soy-bean oil processing • Energy from highly digestible fiber • Energy equal to corn when limited to 0.5% of body weight of grazing cattle • Avoid bloat by feeding 3-4 lbs. effective fiber when self-feeding hulls

  21. Sunflower Meal • By-product of the sunflower oil production process • Protein highly rumen degradable • Low digestibility of hulls limits energy value • Buy based on cost per unit of protein

  22. Wheat • Human use - usually too expensive as feed grain • Low test weight, sprout-damaged wheat sometimes competitively priced to feed grains • Higher rumen degradability of protein than corn • Must be rolled or coarsely ground to be utilized • If feeding high amounts of grain (>1% of weight) blend 30-50% wheat with 50-70% other grain

  23. Wheat Middlings • By-product of flour milling process • Performance similar to corn and soybean supplement in grazing cattle • Energy from highly digestible fiber and starch • Limit to 1% of weight to reduce risk of bloat • Susceptible to molding at moisture content above 11%

  24. Whole Cottonseed • By-product of cotton ginning process • Uniquely high in energy, fat, protein, fiber, and palatability • Limit to 0.5-.75% weight due to fat content • Does not flow in mechanical systems, must be handled manually

  25. Conclusions • Alternative feeds variable in price, availability, and nutrient composition • May require additional handling (mixing), storage, and feeding equipment • Must have knowledge of the feed’s nutrient and physical characteristics • Must consider all feeds available to the cattle and work to provide balanced nutrition • May represent a cost savings opportunity

  26. Questions?

More Related