1 / 73

Annual Project Review

Annual Project Review. 12 October 2000 IST-1999-10500. Introduction. Nick Lodge ITC. Presentation Structure. Introduction Project Management Overview Linguistic Advances for Deaf People Progress on Internet Services Progress on Broadcast Services Commercial Strategies

archer
Télécharger la présentation

Annual Project Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Annual Project Review 12 October 2000 IST-1999-10500

  2. Introduction Nick Lodge ITC

  3. Presentation Structure • Introduction • Project Management Overview • Linguistic Advances for Deaf People • Progress on Internet Services • Progress on Broadcast Services • Commercial Strategies • Video of Counter Services

  4. Project Management Overview John Glauert UEA, Norwich, UK

  5. Project Structure • User Focus • Application Focus • Technology Focus

  6. Evaluation Exploitation WWW High Street Broadcast Language Animation

  7. WWW High Street Broadcast Application Focus • Internet • Information and Education for Deaf People (IvD, IDGS) • High Street • Counter Services – Post Office (UKPO) • Television • Regulation and Standards (ITC, INT, IRT)

  8. Evaluation Exploitation User Focus • Evaluation • Close Involvement of Deaf People (RNID) • Exploitation • Broadcasters and Service Providers (ITC, UKPO, Televirtual)

  9. Language Animation Technology Focus • Sign Language Linguistics • Use of natural sign language (IDGS, UEA, IvD, RNID) • Animation • Increased realism in sign generation (Televirtual, INT, UEA)

  10. Workplan Structure Project Phases • Technology Transfer • Prototype Applications • Advanced Applications

  11. Technology Transfer • First 12 Months • Exchange Existing Prototypes • Establish Collaborative Working • Largely Complete

  12. Prototype Applications • Months 9 to 24 • Enhancement of Prototypes • Extended Flexibility • Focus on Well Defined Domains • Excellent Progress

  13. Advanced Applications • Months 18 to 36 • Increased Animation Realism • Flexible Sign Generation • Advanced Linguistic Processing • Address Wide Ranging Domains

  14. Workpackage Progress • Achievements in Review Period • All Deliverables achieved • Milestones achieved or rescheduled with no impact • Progress on Deliverables • Reported here for Prototype Applications • Planned Changes • Response to Exploitation Opportunities will be presented

  15. Management System • Workpackage Leadership • Consortium Meetings • Workpackage Meetings

  16. Workpackage Leadership • 9 Partners • 8 Workpackages • Workpackage Leadership • Coordination of Partners • Workplan in Single Partner Tasks • Lightweight use of Microsoft Project

  17. Consortium Meetings • Team of Partner Leaders • Quarterly Meetings • First day for Management and Planning • Second day allows for Technical Discussions

  18. Workpackage Meetings • Meetings as required by Workpackage Leader • Extensive use of Email • Website for Document Archive and Exchange

  19. Addressing the needs of Deaf people using natural sign language - Overview of linguistic processing in ViSiCAST Thomas Hanke, IDGS, U Hamburg

  20. Why Sign Language? • Natural language of most Deaf, i.e. not an artificial language • 1‰ in Europe pre-lingually deaf, only 10% of them Deaf of Deaf • Most of them leave school functionally illiterate

  21. What is Sign Language? • A language with its own syntax & lexicon • Not a 1:1 translation from spoken language as is SSE • Not universal, but much closer to each other than spoken languages

  22. What is so special about Sign Language? • Parallel use of articulators • Use of space to encode grammatical function • Iconicity and productivity

  23. Sign Language and Text • No established written form for any sign language • “phonetic” transcription systems such as HamNoSys • Glossing: GIVE-1-3a

  24. HamNoSys • Flexible enough to handle at least the European sign languages, will be verified for DGS, NGT, BSL • Further developed in the project to include nonmanual activities • Embedded into XML: SiGML

  25. SiGML • Three Levels: • Glosses: mapping more or less 1:1 to the animation machines’ database of signs • HamNoSys: phonetic description • Motion capture files: for uninterpreted direct transmission thru SiGML

  26. SiGML (2) • <signed_utterance> • <sign> • <manual_activity gloss=“GIVE-BOOK-1-3a”> • <face attitude=IRONIC> • </sign> • <sign>… • </signed_utterance>

  27. How does it fit in? Web pages English text to Sign Notation Transport & Animation English Spoken lang to text

  28. Standard AI Machine Translation Approach English text Sign Notation (XML) Lexicon Lexicon Grammar Grammar Semantic Structure

  29. To reduce complexity • Restricted Domains • Handling objects in a kitchen • Appartment descriptions • Semi-automatic process • User can help both with signs and word order

  30. Progress on Internet Services Margriet Verlinden IvD, The Netherlands

  31. Workpackage 2 • objective • produce tools that will allow a deaf citizen to access multimedia resources through sign language • deliverables • Browser plug-in (month 12) • Web-page-sign (month 30) • Signing tutor (month 30)

  32. Signing on the WWW • What will it look like? • How does it work? • How is it created? • How far are we now?

  33. link to project info. daily updated signing avatar controls for signing What will it look like? MOCK-UP PLAYPAUSESTOP

  34. How does it work? text from meteo-rological institute Internet-browser + plugin for motion player (=avatar) SERVER CLIENT standard sentences playlist of motion data Internet-page with SiGML

  35. How is it created? text from meteorological institute • update-facility • model for weather forecasts • mapping from stand. senten-ces to sign sequences (3x) • recording + post-editing of signs (3x) • XML for signs: SiGML • user-interface (webpage+plug-in) standard sentences playlist of motion data Internet-page with SiGML

  36. How far are we? • basic functionality implemented • motion data is being post-edited • additional functionality in progress DEMO

  37. Progress on Broadcast Services Mark Wells Televirtual, Norwich, UK

  38. The Problem: • Legislation (UK, soon European) requires on-screen signing • “Open Signing” (ever present) is obtrusive • Even “Closed Signing” uses bandwidth: Broadcasters run a tight bandwidth economy

  39. The Solution: Virtual Human Signing • Can be Open or Closed • Picture Quality not compromised by compression • Potential for User Interaction • Very Cheap in terms of bandwidth

  40. Virtual Humans / Avatars • Entertainment • Communications • Transactions • Guides

  41. Virtual Humans / Avatars • Entertainment

  42. Virtual Humans / Avatars • Communications

  43. Signing Virtual Humans

  44. Recording Signing

  45. Recording Signing Real time Face, Hand, Body, Tracking

More Related