1 / 6

International university collaborations as a policy tool for higher education reform and innovation leverage A snapshot

International university collaborations as a policy tool for higher education reform and innovation leverage A snapshot of the MIT-Portugal Program. Sebastian Pfotenhauer , PhD pfotenh@mit.edu. MIT-Portugal Program MIT Technology & Policy Program MIT Teaching & Learning Lab

arden
Télécharger la présentation

International university collaborations as a policy tool for higher education reform and innovation leverage A snapshot

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. International university collaborations as a policy tool for higher education reform and innovation leverage A snapshot of the MIT-Portugal Program Sebastian Pfotenhauer, PhD pfotenh@mit.edu MIT-Portugal Program MIT Technology & Policy Program MIT Teaching & Learning Lab Harvard Program in Science, Technology, and Society

  2. An MIT tradition • MIT has engaged in large-scale collaborations for decades • India, Egypt, Argentina, Iran, Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore, UK, Abu Dhabi, Portugal, Russia (?) • Different purposes: • Capacity building in STEM education • Excellence-building: Transfer educational best–practices & institutional governance • Internationalization • Systemic change for national HE & innovations systems • Innovation & entrepreneurship leverage • Experimental “one of” character of collaborations – no unified strategy?

  3. MIT-Portugalin a nutshell • MIT + 6 PT universites + 20 research centers • Faculty: 236 @ PT + 59 @ MIT • Students: 350 @ PT, 140 @ MIT • 50+ industry affiliates • 4 Engineering Systems focus areas • Innov.- & mobility-centered curricula • 5 year funding period • 58.9 M€ (81.0 M$) Key facts:

  4. MPP timeline • 2004: Portuguese “Technological Plan” and “National Plan for Employment” • 2005-06: OECD Review of tertiary education sector • Nov. 2005: MIT approached by Portugal • Feb 2006: agreement to conduct assessment: Identify feasible areas of collaboration • February-July 2006: faculty visits in both directions • October 2006: launch of 5-year program • Sep 2008: launch of program assessment • 2011 renewal negotiations for Phase 2

  5. Why MPP? • Why university-based strategy in Portugal? • Human resources: Mismatch between engineering education and innovation/industry needs • S&T capacity: Key role of universities in production of knowledge and technology in catching-up countries • National systems trajectory + international reform pressures (Bologna, Lisbon) • New roles for universities in national innovation systems • Some achievements: • Raise student internationalization and selectivity • Targeted human resource formation in innovation & entrepreneurship • Increase networking between students & institutions, and industry linkages • Excellence formation and critical mass-building: overcome tradition of research isolation and sub-critical funding dispersion • Mobility: Shift from sending to receiving country • International visibility and benchmarking • Spillovers into the system!

  6. Challenges, lessons, research needs • Cultural differences, esp. in innovation & entrepreneurship • Program objectives vs. administrative and legal framework conditions (multiple stakeholders, absorptive capacity of system, political interference) • “Teaching the teachers” • Slow program take-off vs. extremely high expectations & steep learning curve • Real-time program assessment is crucial: • Demonstrate impact • Foster organizational learning • Study the generalizability of MIT-Portugal framework • Problem: temporal lagging of effects & attribution problems • Tools: comparative student surveys, special-purpose surveys, faculty interviews • “One of” problem: unique character of international programs • MIT Technology & Policy Program, MIT Teaching & Learning Lab, Cisco: • Launch project on creating a “best-practice manual in international university collaborations” to systematize and preserve a set of unique lessons

More Related