1 / 9

The Linguistics of SLA

The Linguistics of SLA. The Nature of Language. Languages are systematic We understand the principles by which the words are combined to express meaning Languages are symbolic Sequences of sounds or letters don’t inherently possess meaning.

aretha-massey
Télécharger la présentation

The Linguistics of SLA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Linguistics of SLA

  2. The Nature of Language • Languages are systematic • We understand the principles by which the words are combined to express meaning • Languages are symbolic • Sequences of sounds or letters don’t inherently possess meaning. • The meanings of symbols in a language come through the tacit agreement between the speakers

  3. Languages are social • Each language reflects the social requirements of the society that uses it. • Language is the expressive dimension of culture

  4. Early Approaches to SLA • Contrastive Analysis (Hypothesis) (CAH) • Approach to the study of SLA which involves predicting and explaining learner problems based on a comparison of L1 and L2 to determine similarities and differences. • Got the influence from linguistics and psychology, Structuralism and Behaviorism • The goal of CAH is to increase efficiency in L2 teaching and testing. • The focus is on the surface forms of both L1 and L2 systems and describing an comparing the languages one level at a time.

  5. Early proponents of CAH assumed that language acquisition involves habit formation in a process of S-R-R • There will be transfer in learning, of elements acquired (habituated) in L1 to the target L2. (Positive or negative (interference)) • The CAH approach was not adequate for the study of SLA because: • The behaviorist learning theory to which it is tied can’t explain the logical problem of language learning • CAH analysis were not always validated by evidence from actual learner errors.

  6. 3. Many of the L2 problems which CAH predicts do not emerge, it doesn’t account for many learner errors, and much predicted positive transfer doesn’t materialize.

  7. Error Analysis • The first approach to the study of SLA which includes an internal focus on learners’ creative ability to construct language. • Based on the description and analysis of actual learner errors in L2, rather than on idealized linguistic structures attributed to native speakers of L1 and L2. • EA augmented/replaced CAH in the early 1970w because: • Prediction made by CAH did not always materialize in actual learner errors. • The exclusive focus on surface level forms and patterns by structural linguists shifted to concern on the underlying rules.

  8. 3. There was a shift from behaviorism to mentalism in explaining language acquisition, with emphasis on the innate capacity of the language learner rather than on external influences. 4. The study of SLA was no longer motivated by teaching concerns as it had been for CAH. Researchers began to separate issues in SLA from pedagogical concerns. • No 2 and 3 were mostly influenced by Chomsky’s Transformational-Generative Grammar.

More Related