210 likes | 340 Vues
In Week Five, Dr. Stephen Ogden presents a common-sense strategy for tackling definitions and classifications within various contexts. This approach emphasizes stable definitions for clear communication and highlights two primary modes of description: functional and emotional. The chapter explores the essential elements of description, including sensory impressions, dominant impressions, and the arrangement of details, which can significantly enhance both academic and personal narratives. Understanding these elements can improve clarity and engagement in various writing forms, encouraging effective communication and deeper connections.
E N D
Week Five Dr. Stephen Ogden LIBS 7001
Common Sense Approach to Definition & Classification • There is, fortunately, a practical approach to the type of “problems” detailed in the articles for this week, for those of us who are not (or, not only) academics. • A common-sense practice: assume a stable definition (e.g. “truck”), but see any uncertainty or issue as simply a matter of classification: • “does this vehicle belong in the category ‘truck’ ?
DESCRIPTION • creates sharply etched word pictures of objects, persons, scenes, events, situations • in work/personal/academic settings, can describe • a patient’s condition for a chart • a product in an advertisement • site conditions in a report • can • create a mood • stimulate understanding • lead to action
Two Types of Description Functional • “just the facts”: denotative • purpose: to explain, clarify • allegedly objective, observed from a distance • common in lab reports, formal reports • logical order of ideas • perspective: description of parts, materials, functions Emotional • impressionistic: connotative • purpose: to convey ideas, moods, impressions • impressionistic, subjective • common in everyday life, and in artistic writing • highly variable order of ideas • different perspectives possible
Elements of Description • To help drive home your points vividly in an essay or speech, carefully use these five elements of description: • Sensory Impression • Dominant Impression • Vantage Point • Selection of Details • Arrangement of Details
Sensory Impression, cont. • appropriate words / comparisons , cont. • “… the kind of woman who plays with a full deck of credit cards…” (Ehrenreich, 10) • an egg that “starts to disgorge a cloud of white stuff like a medium at an old-fashioned séance” (Nabokov, 38) • blend several sense impressions • “Ah…fresh bread” (last frame of Pekar essay) • evokes sense of touch (shape, heat), sight, smell
2. Dominant Impression • an overall mood or feeling, such as joy, anger, terror, or distaste • may be identified or left unnamed • can be developed throughout the description • “Yet, the overriding sensation I had was of always being out of place.” (Said, 37) • “Not long ago a former friend and soon-to-be acquaintance called me up to tell me how busy she was.” (Ehrenreich, 9) • may be influenced by vantage-point
3. Vantage Point - two types • fixed:observer remains in one place • “Boil water in a saucepan (bubbles mean it is boiling!)” (Nabokov, 38) • moving: observer views things from different positions • e.g., E. Said moving through time: • “In my early adolescence….Now I have divined that…” (Said, p. 39)
4. Selection of Details • A good writer selects details pointing toward the mood or feeling s/he is trying to create. • Exclusion is as important as inclusion. • How does a writer suggest stillness or nothingness? • What are the implications of leaving out certain details? Are there limits to a writer’s creative license? What’s a writer’s ethical responsibility when using description & narration?
5. Arrangement of Details • to guide reader and fulfill purpose, use a clear pattern or organization - e.g., • spatial • sequential • contrast • can start with a striking central feature • Said’s discussion of the 2 halves of his name
NARRATION • relates series of real or imagined events • Narration, a story, can • tell what happened • delve into motives • offer lessons and insights (but doesn’t have to) • do all of the above.
Narrative: Examples of Non-Literary Uses • Used at work, at home, at school: e.g., • details in a lab or inspection report • Any report is a form of narration • development of a research project • history of an employee’s work problems • Both by the employee and the employer • Meeting minutes write-up • Politics: ‘narrative’ is now an essential tool • Create a partisan story about society, selves & opponents • Journalism: • news stories are forms of narrative
Elements of Narration • Six elements together produce strong narration: • purpose • action • conflict • point of view • key events • dialogue
1. Purpose • can be stated or unstated but always shapes the writing • may • tell what happened • establish a useful fact • delve into motives • offer lessons or insights Not all “stories” have a moral or teach a lesson.
2. Action • plays a central role in narrative by presenting, not just suggesting, something that happens • suggested (or reported): • “Time seemed forever against me.” (Said, 38) • represented directly: • “ They went to Michigan Militia meetings. They blew up ‘things’ in the backyard.” (Moore, 84)
Action, cont. • Think visually (cinematically) when writing a narrative. • “…a passage on the piano might cause a sudden transformation of her face, a dramatic elevation in her tone, a breathtakingly wide opening of arms, as she took me in with ‘Bravo, Edward’…” (Said, 38) • “With a small spoon tap-tap in a circle and then pry open the lid of the shell.” (Nabokov, 38) • Many experiences are “action:” e.g., thinking, feeling, deciding • “They also serve who only stand and wait.” (John Milton, “On His Blindness,” 1652)
3. Conflict • Real, imagined, anticipated conflicts shape our lives; see Gk. agon - meaning “contest” • Some varieties of conflict: • between an individual and outside circumstances: Nabokov’s eggs & egg-cooker • between 2 group members: Said & mother • between__________________________ • between__________________________ • within____________________________
4. Point of View - types • First person: one of the participants tells what happened. • uses I, me, mine, we, ours • limited to what that person knows; narrator can be unreliable because of incomplete knowledge • Second-person:less often used • you is used or understood • imperative & directive; or conversational • Third-person: distanced “narrator” recalls. • uses he, she, it, they • narrator can be omniscient, intrusive, or limited in knowledge, deliberately misleading
5. Key Events • Strong narratives are built around key events bearing directly on its purpose. E.g. • Pekar’s paralleling the progress of his thoughts and physical progress towards the bakery, where a resolution occurs on both levels (“quandry” resolved, AND loaf of bread obtained) • Said’s discussion of his mother’s death as a key event, which helps to remind him of both his childhood and his own mortality. • consider “narratives” of election candidates
6. Dialogue • Conversation animates narrative: • indirect/reported- narrator strongly controls presentation and mood; reader is distanced from the scene • “..called me up to tell me how busy she was.” (Ehre., 9) • direct - generally (but not always) more vivid; also leaves more scope for reader interpretation: • narrator in strong control: “… the days when ‘Let’s have lunch’ meant something other than ‘I’ve got more important things to do than to talk to you now’…” (E,9) • integrated into narrative: “’Help me to sleep, Edward’…” (Said, 39, in which he’s both character and narrator)
For the narration readings (Ignatieff, Fraser, Mukherjee), consider these questions: • What is the author's purpose? • Where & how does the author use specific descriptive and narrative techniques? • Narration often produces a personal, "gut" reader response. Critically analyze your own response to these essays: • What exactly was your response? • What factors (e.g.: your experiences, knowledge, the author's story, descriptive & narrative techniques) might have combined to produce your response? • How did you transcend your "gut reaction" to gain a more objective reading of the text?