90 likes | 190 Vues
Explore the evolution and impact of the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) since its inception in 2002, detailing its review activities, practice guides, and quick reviews. Discover the focus on key education themes, latest review areas, and upcoming guides. Stay informed on WWC's mission to provide educators with clear, evidence-based information to enhance teaching practices.
E N D
What’s Next for the What Works Clearinghouse Mark Dynarski 2008 IES Research Conference June 2008
A brief history • Launched in 2002 to be a central and trusted source of scientific evidence • Identifies topic areas, develops standards, begins reviewing research literature • To date, reviewed over 1,600 studies of almost 400 interventions • Released 90 intervention reports, 5 topic reports, 4 practice guides, 5 quick reviews
Themes • Objective: Bring answers to educators • Focus groups: Educators want clear information quickly • Practice guides seen as useful and pitched at the right level
Current review activities • Four active areas • Beginning reading, middle school math, early childhood education, dropout prevention • New areas • Adolescent literacy, high school math and science, writing, professional development, out-of-school time • Special education topics: dyslexia, ADHD, behavior, autism
Practice Guides • Four released • Two nearing release (adolescent literacy and dropout prevention) • Two being prepared • Response to intervention (reading) • Behavior in the classroom • More underway • Response to intervention (math) • Preparing low-income students for college • Out of school time • Data-driven decision making
Quick Reviews • Purpose: assess whether recent high-visibility research is consistent with WWC standards • Five released, more in progress, wide range of topics • After-school programs • Student drug testing • Computer-based instruction in pre-algebra • Financial incentives for AP grades • Sixth grade in middle or elementary school
Under development • Standards for Single-Subject and Regression Discontinuity Designs • Enhancements to existing standards • Attrition • Equivalence in quasi-experimental designs • Extent of evidence • Registry of Randomized Trials
Suggestions or comments? E-mail to info@whatworks.ed.gov or Go to “Contact” on whatworks.ed.gov