1 / 26

QA at University of Lausanne Developing a Quality culture

QA at University of Lausanne Developing a Quality culture. Jacques èsJjj Jacques LANARES. Quality at . Context and Intentions UNIL Quality Concept Evaluation and Perspectives. Quality Culture. Quality Assurance. A bottom up project . 1994. 1999-2000. Quality Culture.

armine
Télécharger la présentation

QA at University of Lausanne Developing a Quality culture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. QA at University of LausanneDeveloping a Quality culture Jacques èsJjjJacques LANARES

  2. Quality at • Context and Intentions • UNIL Quality Concept • Evaluation and Perspectives

  3. QualityCulture QualityAssurance

  4. A bottom up project... 1994 1999-2000

  5. Quality Culture • Fitness for Purpose • Responsibility • Participation • Reflexivity • Balance between Autonomy and Accountability

  6. Fitness for Purpose • 4 Basic questions • Follow up of Action plans

  7. To try to avoid paternalism • Involving Faculty in definition of priorities • Constructive feedback

  8. To Encourage Participation • COVER • Faculty’s Committees

  9. Autority Specificity Transparency Documentation Bureaucracy Confidentiality Uniformity Auto-gestion Balance between Autonomy & Accountability

  10. Teacher’s priorities Expectationsprofessional fields Student’s Needs A process to regulate « tensions »

  11. InvestigationsProfessional Bodies Teacher’s priorities Expectationsprofessional fields TeachingEvaluation Student’s Needs investigationsprevious students A process to regulate « tensions »

  12. Quality at • Context and Intentions • UNIL Quality Concept • Evaluation and Perspectives

  13. Quality at • A committee to implement : Cover • Self evaluation of faculties / 4ans • Self evaluation report • External point of view : Experts • Articulation with global strategy Document a reflexive process

  14. COVER • Develop and rules the process • 23 membersProfessorsIntermediate teachers (MER, assistants)StudentsPATVice Rector

  15. Programs et curricula Organisation Of research Individualteachings Teachingdimensions Researchdimensions Pedagogy Research collaboration ReflexiveCanvas Communication & valorisation Of results Support To students Transversaldimensions Human Resources Logistique

  16. “Individual teachings” • Objectives and priorities of teaching • Teaching methods • Evaluation of teaching • Assessment of students • Integration of research in teaching

  17. 4 Levels - 4 questions • What are the objectives in the dimension? • How do you know where you are ? • What are the results ? • What are the next steps to improve ?

  18. Report • Profile of the faculty • Answers to questions • Synthesis • Action plan

  19. Expert’s profile • Experience of governance • Experience of evaluation • Knowledge Swiss HE system • Knowledge of the domain

  20. Expert’s role : meta-evaluation • “Plausibility” of the report • Main questions addressed • Coherence of Action Plan • Open suggestions

  21. I. SELF EVALUATION II. EXTERNAL EXPERTISE III. FOLLOW UP Dean Experts Dean Direction Dean  External evaluation report (1 version)       External evaluation report (finalisé) Validation of reports and action plan Self evaluationReport & action plan Action Plan (finalised) Reaction on expertise  COVER .

  22. Quality at • Context and Intentions • UNIL Quality Concept • Evaluation and Perspectives

  23. Feedback from faculties • Stimulate global reflection, new discussions • Helps to identify priorities & actions • Difficult to get a large implication • Requires a “significant” investment

  24. Global satisfaction AE

  25. Perspectives • Improve tools & guidelines • Complete Evaluation of all faculties • Introduce simplifications • Re-enforce the culture

  26. “Pertinence is more importantthan conformity”

More Related