1 / 7

PERFORMER WP2 Introduction

PERFORMER WP2 Introduction. 13th of September 2013 CSTB Sophia Antipolis, France. WP2 ‘Holistic Assessment Framework for Building Energy PerfoRMANCES’ – Overview. Objectives:

arwen
Télécharger la présentation

PERFORMER WP2 Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PERFORMERWP2Introduction 13th of September 2013 CSTB Sophia Antipolis, France

  2. WP2 ‘Holistic Assessment Framework for Building Energy PerfoRMANCES’– Overview Objectives: • To build a consistent and comprehensive framework, which augments the PERFORMER solution with ICT-enabled smartness and automation Facts & figures • RTD work-package – mainly focused on ICT • Duration: M1 – M30 • Involving UPL, CSTB, CEA, CU, BRE, EC, GDF, SG, SIGMA, CCC (Leader CEA) • Total WP effort = 93 p.m (15% of project’s total effort) Activities • Specifying and prototyping a comprehensive and adaptable (i.e. scalable) ICT infrastructure (sensors, communication software, interfaces, and devices) for building energy, comfort and usage data collection. • Assessing, selecting and implementing the most relevant combinations of artificial intelligence and building digital modelling approaches for real-time energy monitoring, awareness and management. • Providing smart visualization and decision support during operation phase. PERFORMER Kick-Off meeting

  3. WP2 ‘Holistic Assessment Framework for Building Energy PerfoRMANCES’ – structure Task 2.1: Base technology selection (CU) Task 2.2: Building intrinsic and actual performances energy assessment ICT infrastructure (ECG) Task 2.3: Energy performance modelling environment (CEA) Task 2.4: Energy performances management (CSTB) MS4: Delivery of Intrinsic and in-use performance monitoring and management framework(M30) D2.1: Performer Base Technologies Report (M6, 9 p.m) D2.2: Intrinsic Performances Assessment Framework(M24, 24 p.m) D2.3: Energy Performance Modelling Environment (M24, 27 p.m) D2.4: Actual Performance Monitoring and Management Framework (M30, 33 p.m) PERFORMER Kick-Off meeting

  4. WP2 ‘Holistic Assessment Framework for Building Energy PerfoRMANCES’ – dependencies Methodological support D1.1: PERFORMER framework (M12) D1.2: Methodologies for the Assessment of Intrinsic Energy Performance of Building Envelopes (M15) D1.3: Cost Optimised Energy Performance Measurement Plan Methodology (M15) D1.4: Specification for Energy Management, Fault Detection and Diagnostic Tools (M15) Pilot information D3.1: Pilot Building Characteristics and Related Energy Data (M9) D3.3: Pilot Information Model (M12) D3.4: Consideration of Measurement Challenges (M12) Demonstration requirements D4.1: Pilot Version Sharing and Awareness Raising Report (M6) WP1: Global framework and methodologies WP3: Pilot Data Gathering WP4: Demonstrators WP2: ICT framework SoA (D2.1) and ICT-related requirements and limitations Technology Research results ICT infrastructure and tools (D2.2, D2.3, D2.4) WP1: Global framework and methodologies WP6: Dissemination and exploitation WP4: Demonstrators WP5: Replication and Assessment

  5. Activity plan M1-M6 WP2 ‘Holistic Assessment Framework for Building Energy PerfoRMANCES’ PERFORMER Kick-Off meeting

  6. WP2 - comments • Work organization • List of participants + one main contact point for each partners • One conf call every two weeks • F2Fmeetings when necessary • Having a WP2 workshop at M3 about the architecture? • Need business models • Initially planned at M48 – early internal delivery? • The planning is tight • Two ICT deliverables at M24 • There is a risk of “drift” to M28-M30 • Need for an early awareness of end-users functional requirements • From WP3-4-5 • Impact on technology choice (e.g. MAS vs expert systems)

  7. Thank YOU • Any questions?

More Related