1 / 16

Mobile Crowdsensing : Current State and Future Challenges

Mobile Crowdsensing : Current State and Future Challenges. Raghu K. Ganti, Fan Ye, and Hui Lei IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, NY. Presented by: Sheekha Khetan. Introduction.

astro
Télécharger la présentation

Mobile Crowdsensing : Current State and Future Challenges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mobile Crowdsensing: Current State andFuture Challenges Raghu K. Ganti, Fan Ye, and Hui Lei IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, NY Presented by: Sheekha Khetan

  2. Introduction • Mobile Crowdsensing - individuals with sensing and computing devices collectively share information to measure and map phenomena of common interest. • Devices - smartphones, music players, and in-vehicle sensing devices

  3. Introduction

  4. Introduction • Community sensing is popularly called participatory sensing or opportunistic sensing • Participatory sensing- individuals are actively involved in contributing sensor data • Opportunistic sensing - autonomous and user involvement is minimal • Research Challenges • Localized analytics • Resource limitations • Privacy • Aggregate analytics • Architecture

  5. MOBILE CROWDSENSING APPLICATIONS

  6. MCS: UNIQUE CHARACTERISTICS • Multi-modality sensing capabilities • Deployed in the field • The dynamic conditions in the collection of mobile devices • Privacy • Energy • Cost • Efforts

  7. LOCALIZED ANALYTICS

  8. LOCALIZED ANALYTICS • Less amount and appropriately summarized data • Reduces the amount of processing that the backend has to perform

  9. LOCALIZED ANALYTICS – Challenges • Some applications may be delay sensitive • Data mediation, such as filtering of outliers, elimination of noise, or makeup for data gaps. • Context inference • Transportation mode • Kinetic modes of humans • Social settings

  10. LOCALIZED ANALYTICS – Challenges • Due to highly dynamic nature, modeling and predicting the energy, bandwidth requirements to accomplish a particular task becomes much more difficult • Identifying and scheduling sensing and communication jobs among them under resource constraints becomes more difficult as well • Interdependencies between various types of sensory data due to multi-modality sensing capability • The existence of multiple concurrent applications that require data of different types also complicates resource allocation

  11. Questions that need to be answered • How do multiple applications on the same device utilize energy, bandwidth, and computation resources without significantly affecting the data quality of each other? • How does scheduling of sensing tasks occur across multiple devices with diverse sensing capabilities and availabilities (which can change dynamically)?

  12. Privacy • Potentially collect sensitive sensor data pertaining to individuals • the routes they take in daily commutes • their home and work locations

  13. Approaches to privacy • Anonymization • One of the approaches • Still not reliable • Cryptographic techniques Require the generation and maintenance of multiple keys • Perturbation based approach • adds noise to sensor data before sharing

  14. AGGREGATE ANALYTICS • These analytics detect patterns in the sensor data from large number of mobile devices • coordinate the traffic lights • public works maintenance

  15. ARCHITECTURE

  16. Existing MCS applications take an ”application silo” approach where each application is built from scratch without any common component even though they face many common challenges. Such an architecture hinders the development of new MCS applications

More Related