SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

F.D.R vs. Supreme Court Court Packing

audi avatar
7 diapositives · 328 Views · Aug 04, 2014

F.D.R vs. Supreme Court Court Packing. By Cody McKinley. The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937. Legislative initiative proposed by F.D.R Wanted to gain favor on new deal measures that had been struck down and declared unconstitutional It was unveiled on February 5, 1937

F.D.R vs. Supreme Court Court Packing - slide 1
01 / 7F.D.R vs. Supreme Court Court Packing
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

F.D.R vs. Supreme Court Court Packing
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. F.D.R vs. Supreme CourtCourt Packing By Cody McKinley

  2. The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 • Legislative initiative proposed by F.D.R • Wanted to gain favor on new deal measures that had been struck down and declared unconstitutional • It was unveiled on February 5, 1937 • And on march 9 1937 was the subject of 1 of his fireside chats • It ultimately failed due to adverse public opinion

  3. About the bill • The provisions adhered to 4 basic principles • The president can add 1 justice for each one that is over the age of 70 years 6 months • Limitations on the # of judges the president could appoint: no more than 6 S.C.J. and no more than 2 on any lower federal court • Lower level judges be able to float around to other courts with busy or backlogged dockets • Lower courts be administered by S.C. through newly created proctors

  4. Public Reaction • The public was split, partly because 1. the supreme court was conflated with the constitution 2. Roosevelt’s personal involvement • In his March 9 fireside chat he stated that the the nation had reached a point where it needed to save the constitution from the supreme court

  5. Critics and Failings of the New Deal By Cody McKinley (again)

  6. Critics • Huey Long- thought it was too generous to corporate interests. • Charles Coughlin- considered Roosevelt a dictator and called new deal communist

  7. Failings • Too slow and cautious to provide fiscal stimulus • Too much public power in private hands • New deal policies disproportionally benefited white men