1 / 31

The Zen of Surveys

The Zen of Surveys. Heather Morrison Communication 801, February 2010.

audra-schultz
Télécharger la présentation

The Zen of Surveys

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Zen of Surveys Heather Morrison Communication 801, February 2010 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Canada License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ca/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105,. USA

  2. HTTP://WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM

  3. Create new survey

  4. Edit survey

  5. ADD a question - examples

  6. Multiple choice multiple answers

  7. Preview survey

  8. Collect responses

  9. Next steps

  10. http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GD37BTY

  11. Analyze results

  12. Why surveys? • Data about groups of people • Opinions • Factual information • Attitudes, values • Classroom tool (online polls) • Secondary analysis • Known method / advocacy tool

  13. Fred Horne, Alberta MLA on consultation sessions re recent 39% increase in funding for public libraries: “Through our consultation we encountered so many Albertans who are passionate and committed to providing quality library services. They recognized that libraries are a fundamental and tremendously important part of community life. They acknowledged that their lives as citizens and collectively as a community are enhanced because of the programs and services they access at their library. Their dedication is both remarkable and infectious. We hope we captured their passion in our report”.

  14. Planning a survey • The research question Are BC ELN communications as effective as they could be?

  15. Population and sample • Census – full population • Sampling frame: everyone who could respond • Probability sampling • Random numbers table • Systematic • Multi-stage cluster • Non-probability sampling

  16. Unit of analysis • Individual, family, journal, newspaper • You • Singular • Plural: family, social group, community • BC ELN • Office / network • Individual / department / library • Functional groups

  17. From concept to indicator (de VAUS) • Clarify concepts • BC ELN communications: website, listservs, quarterly newsletter, budget document, annual Year in Review • Effective: key stakeholders have the information they need (but not unwanted information) • Develop indicators • Importance, satisfaction, perceived gaps • Evaluate initial indicators

  18. Decide on approach • Questionnaire • Web-based • Mail • Telephone • Focus group • Interview (structured or semi-structured) • Telephone • In-person • Consumer society / agonistic (Brinkmann, Kvale) • Content analysis

  19. Designing a questionnaire • Length • Introduction: purpose of questionnaire • Question order • Easy to hard • Logical • Thank you & follow-up • Pretesting

  20. To answer a question… • Decoding the question How often do youwatch television? • Memory • Analysis • Opinion. Do I have one? • Social desirability bias

  21. Creating questions • Clear, unambiguous wording • Neutral non-leading questions (??) • Easy response options • Preselected • How often do you watch television • 1-2 hours / month • 1-2 hours / day • Right amount • Includes the responses people want to give (don’t know) • Sensitive questions • Leading?

  22. Types of questions • Agree / disagree • Scales / Likert • Strongly agree to strongly disagree • Ranking • Open versus closed • Filtering questions

  23. Analysis & interpretation • Response rate • Differences between responders and non-responders • A tale of two surveys • Reliability • Opinion / multi-question checking • Generalizability (sample) • Validity • Coding (open-ended questions)

  24. Critical evaluation • Bias: funders? • Introduction and question wording • Given the current tough economic climate, how much funding should be given to the arts? Versus: • Given how much the arts enhance our lives, how much funding should this area receive?

  25. Critical evaluation: responses • Self-selection bias • Open web surveys • Waltham study • Who was included? • Who was excluded? • Marginalized groups • Homeless • Illegal immigrants • Response rates

  26. BC ELN Draft Communications survey

  27. Discussion questions • Consumer versus agonistic interviews • Experiences with surveys • Video: Ask a Silly Question

  28. References • Brinkmann, S. (2007). Could interviews be epistemic? an alternative to qualitative opinion polling. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1116-1138. doi:10.1177/1077800407308222 • De Vaus, D. A. (1995). Surveys in social research (4th ed. ed.). North Sydney, NSW, Australia : Allen & Unwin. • Kvale, S. (2006). Dominance through interviews and dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3), 480-500. doi:10.1177/1077800406286235

  29. references • Waltham, M. 2009. The future of scholarly journal publishing among social sciences and humanities journals. Princeton, New Jersey. Retrieved from: http://www.nhalliance.org/bm~doc/hssreport.pdf • - critique of Waltham study: Morrison, H. 2009. Humanities and social sciences: thoughts towards transition to OA. The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics. Retrieved from: http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/humanities-and-social-sciences-thoughts.html

More Related