310 likes | 432 Vues
This project presentation by Mark McGinley provides an in-depth look at BWdetail, a bandwidth testing tool designed to estimate available bandwidth and monitor flow without requiring kernel modifications. Sponsored by NSF and DOE, the presentation discusses the growing need for effective bandwidth diagnostics in scientific research, particularly for handling large datasets with distributed collaborators. Key features of BWdetail, including its software architecture, reporting capabilities, and multi-threaded operation, are highlighted, alongside a demonstration of its effectiveness in real-world applications.
E N D
BWdetail: A bandwidth tester with detailed reporting Masters of Engineering Project Presentation Mark McGinley April 19, 2007 Advisor: Malathi Veeraraghavan Acknowledgement: This work was carried out under the sponsorship of NSF ITR-0312376, NSF ANI-0335190, and DOE DE-FG02-04ER25640 grants.
Outline • Problem Statement • Related Work • Overview of BWdetail • Features and Uses • Demonstration • Conclusion
Problem Statement • Growing eScience traffic Terabytes / month ESnet Monthly Accepted Traffic, January, 2000 – June, 2006 Ref. 1
Problem Statement • Scientific research efforts such as Atlas characterized by: • Large datasets • Geographically distributed collaborators • 1800 physicists, 150 universitiesand laboratories • Supporting high speed transfers of datasets often requires system tuning, diagnostics [2]
Outline • Problem Statement • Related Work • Overview of BWdetail • Features and Uses • Demonstration • Conclusion
Related Work • Iperf from NLANR • Successor to ttcp, similar to nttcp, nuttcp • Web100 • Host system software (autotuning) • Lack of instrumentation/tools for diagnosing performance issues • Iperf100 • Web100-based Iperf
Related Work • Nettest • Incorporates Iperf • Net100 • Leverages Web100 to eliminate “wizard gap” with autotuning • tcpdump
Related Work • Iperf
Related Work • tcpdump
Related Work • BWdetail
Outline • Problem Statement • Related Work • Overview of BWdetail • Features and Uses • Demonstration • Conclusion
Overview of BWdetail • Bandwidth estimation ability of Iperf • Instrumentation capabilities similar to Web100, without kernel modification
Overview of BWdetail • Software architecture • C program • TCP_INFO struct associated with each socket • Kernel parameters read/written using getsockopt(), setsockopt(), sysctl(), system()
Outline • Problem Statement • Related Work • Overview of BWdetail • Features and Uses • Demonstration • Conclusion
Features and Uses • Data transfer for goodput estimation • Memory-to-memory is most common usage • Disk/memory-to-disk/memory • Memory transfer can either be a specific size or duration • Disk transfer using a file of specific size, to eliminate caching effects
Features and Uses • Effect of caching • 1 GB disk-to-disk successive transfer
Features and Uses • Multi-threaded client • Client uses separate threads to send data and monitor flow
Features and Uses • Tunable parameters from command line • Socket buffer size • TCP congestion control algorithm • CTCP-enabled Web100 capable • SACK, Nagle, no metrics save
Features and Uses • Adjustable reporting granularity • Client and server report goodput over some small, configurable interval (100ms) • Client reports cwnd, RTT, etc, every smaller, configurable interval (5ms)
Features and Uses • Applications • Research regarding transport protocols • CTCP/Reno/BIC • Cwnd and RTT measurements • Improving performance on a path • Records relevant kernel parameters • Ongoing recording of cwnd, RTT, goodput • Change parameters, repeat
Outline • Problem Statement • Related Work • Overview of BWdetail • Features and Uses • Demonstration • Conclusion
Outline • Problem Statement • Related Work • Overview of BWdetail • Features and Uses • Demonstration • Conclusion
Conclusion • Available bandwidth estimation • Instrumentation such as cwnd without requiring kernel modification or privileged access
Thank you Questions?
References • [1] W.E. Johnston, ESnet4: Networking for the Future of DOE Science, http://www.es.net/ESnet4/ESnet4-Internet2Members-Dec-06-2006-1.ppt, Dec. 5, 2006 • [2] The Atlas Experiment, www.atlas.ch
Limitations • Does not replace tcpdump • tcpdump handles content • Needed to detect retransmissions, Ethernet PAUSE frames, verification • Incorporation of libpcap capabilities would degrade the non-interference status of BWdetail • BWdetail is interested in statistics, not content
Limitations • BWdetail does not replace an expert • Still requires knowledge to tune, does not provide autotuning • Use of TCP_INFO struct presents portability issues
Impact of monitoring • Minimal, even at ~1 Gbps