1 / 26

The New IDEA: Major Changes

The New IDEA: Major Changes. Presentation to the Charter Schools Summit November 7, 2006 Nancy Reder, Esq. Deputy Executive Director NASDSE. Ten Critical Issues. Alignment with the No Child Left Behind Act Highly qualified teachers Early intervening/Response to Intervention

avariella
Télécharger la présentation

The New IDEA: Major Changes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The New IDEA: Major Changes Presentation to the Charter Schools Summit November 7, 2006 Nancy Reder, Esq. Deputy Executive Director NASDSE

  2. Ten Critical Issues • Alignment with the No Child Left Behind Act • Highly qualified teachers • Early intervening/Response to Intervention • Private schools • NIMAS/NIMAC

  3. Ten Critical Issues • IEPs • Procedural safeguards • Monitoring • Discipline • Funding issues

  4. Highly Qualified Teachers • Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT) Must be fully certified • Those teaching core content areas must be highly qualified in content • Consultative teachers need not be highly qualified in content • Teachers for those with significant cognitive impairments have different standard

  5. HQT and Charter Schools • Certification for teachers in charter schools depends on the state’s charter school law • Only 14 states have any type of waiver • But remember – still need to have B.A. and demonstrate competency

  6. More on HQT • Can use HOUSSE (high, objective, uniform state standard of evaluation) to demonstrate competence • Issues • Phaseout of HOUSSE ? • Private schools • Rural and special ed teachers

  7. Early Intervening§613(f) & 618(d); 300.226 & 300.646(b)(2) • 15% of funds can be used to serve at-risk students – focus on early grades • When is this an LEA option and when is it a requirement? • No right to FAPE

  8. Response to Intervention§614(b); 300.8(c)(10) RtI is the practice of (1) providing high quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and (2) using learning rate over time and level of performance to (3) make important educational decisions

  9. RtI and Special Ed/General Ed • RtI is NOT something that happens in special ed • RtI IS something that happens in the general ed classroom • RtI IS related to the identification of students with learning and behavior disabilities

  10. RtI Resources • Response to Intervention: Policy Considerations and Implementation • Available from www.nasdse.org • Additional resources (white paper; presentation) available at www.nasdse.org • www.IDEApartnership.org • www.nrcld.org

  11. Private School Students§612(a)(10);300.130-300.144 • Highly qualified teachers • LEA where private school is located has new responsibilities • Child Find • Providing services and transportation • Must consult with private schools on services to be provided

  12. More on Parentally Placed Private School Students • Need to provide equitable share – not the same as providing all services on the IEP • Preschool issues • Private schools can file complaint with SEA or the Secretary of Education

  13. NIMAS/NIMAC§612(a)(23); 300.172 • National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard • NIMAC (Center) • Addresses need for instructional materials in accessible formats to persons who are blind or who have print disabilities • Resources: http://nimas.cast.org

  14. IEPs§614(d); 300.320-300.328 • IEP team • IEP meetings • IEP content • Measurable annual goals, including both academic and functional • Transition issues • Planning concerns • Statement of Performance (SOP)

  15. More on IEPs • Special ed and related services must be based on peer reviewed research to the extent practicable • Eliminated short-term objectives and benchmarks • Prohibition against requiring medication as a condition of school attendance • Definitions EXCLUDE surgically implanted medical devices (e.g., cochlear implants)

  16. Procedural Safeguards§615; 300.500-330.520 • Parent consent required prior to an initial evaluation, the initial provision of services and re-evaluations • Parent consent required for transition services personnel to be present at IEP meetings • Parent consent required to tap Medicaid

  17. More on Procedural Safeguards • 60-day timeline to complete initial evaluation (unless SEA has its own timeline) • Screening for instructional purposes is not an evaluation • Coordinate transfer of records • Child cannot be determined to be child with a disability if there is a lack of appropriate instruction in reading or math or LEP

  18. More on Procedural Safeguards • Due Process complaints • Timelines for filing due process complaint – 2 year statute of limitations • Notice • Timelines for action • Resolution process within 15 days • Mediation optional • Hearing within 45 days • Attorney fees

  19. Monitoring§616; 300.600-300.609 • Entire new section (616) on monitoring • Requires development of 6-year state performance plan (SPP) – were due December 2005 • Annual reports on SPP (annual performance reports (APRs)) – first ones due in February 2007 • 20 indicators for Part B • 14 indicators for Part C

  20. More on Monitoring • Interventions by the Secretary include: • Suggestions for technical assistance • Directing use of state-level funds • Development of corrective action plan • Withholding of SEA funds

  21. More on Monitoring • Approval process by Secretary • Meets requirements • Needs assistance in implementing the requirements • Needs intervention in implementing the requirements • Needs substantial intervention in implementing the requirements

  22. More on Monitoring • SEAs to evaluate LEAs in the same manner • The evaluations are not required to be made public

  23. Discipline§615(k); 300.530-300.537 • Adds a new authority for school personnel to consider unique circumstances (when considering change of placement) • Adds “serious bodily injury” for interim removal • Short-term removals • Long-term removals

  24. Discipline • Clarifies when services are required during disciplinary removals • Specifies when the LEA must give notice • New standard for manifestation determinations • Functional behavior assessments added • “Known or shown have known” requirement

  25. Funding Issues • Regs clarify that charter schools must be nonprofits to receive federal funding • Flow of funds: Feds >State>LEA>School building (with exceptions) • Federal funding dependent on appropriations – not on what’s in authorizing legislation

  26. Resources • www.nasdse.org • www.ideapartnership.org • http://idea.ed.gov • www.ed.gov • http://nspd.rrfcnetwork.org/search/searcher.php [National State Policy Database (NSPD)]

More Related