1 / 52

Transcription regulation in prokaryotes

Transcription regulation in prokaryotes. Background: major and minor grooves of DNA. Available interactions in minor and major grooves. Schematic view of available chemical groups in minor and major grooves. In major groove all 4 nucleotides can be differentiated by a binding protein

Télécharger la présentation

Transcription regulation in prokaryotes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.


Presentation Transcript

  1. Transcription regulation in prokaryotes

  2. Background: major and minor grooves of DNA

  3. Available interactions in minor and major grooves

  4. Schematic view of available chemical groups in minor and major grooves • In major groove all 4 nucleotides can be differentiated by a binding protein • In minor groove only AT or GC base pairs can be differentiated • The minor groove is also much narrower, which makes it less accessible for binding proteins • As a consequence, most sequence specific DNA binding proteins bind to major groove

  5. Helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif • Helix-turn-helix motif is the most common DNA-binding motif in prokaryotes, present in many transcription repressors and activators • One of the helices, DNA recognition helix, gets inserted in the major groove of DNA • Helix-turn-helix proteins are often dimeric, with two recognition helices recognizing two adjacent DNA sequences • Why dimeric? • Dimer binds to DNA stronger than monomer • By changing the relative positions of monomers, the dimer activity can be easily turned on and off

  6. A common principle to activate or inactivate dimeric helix-turn-helix proteins • Ligand changes the position of DNA binding a helices, so they do not bind DNA any more • Or the opposite – ligand changes the position of helices, so they do bind to DNA (ligand)

  7. The main features of interactions between DNA and the helix-turn-helix motif in DNA-binding proteins • 1. Sequence unspecific interactions contribute to overall stability of complex, but do not differentiate the ound DNA sequence • 2. Sequence specific interactions determine, with which regions of DNA the interaction will occur

  8. Bacterial promoters Transcription start +1 UP element • Most bacterial promoters have –35 and –10 elements • Some have UP element • Some lack –35 element, but have extended –10 region -35 element -10 element (Pribnow box) +1 pre –10 element

  9. The s factors • s factors are required for promoter recognition and transcription initiation in prokaryotes • s factors have analogous function as general transcription factors in eukaryotes • A variety of s factors exist in E.coli • For expression from most promoters s70 is required • For expression from some bacterial promoters one of other s subunits is needed instead • s70 is essential for cell growth in all conditions, while other sigmas are required for special events, like nitrogen regulation (s54), response to heat shock (s32), sporulation, etc

  10. RNA pol s Holoenzyme Promoter region -35 -10 Closed complex Open complex Promoter escape Elongation mRNA s release The overview of s factor function

  11. The promoter specificity of some s factors in E.coli s70 TTGACA – 17 bp – TATAATN3-6-A -35 -10 +1 s32 CTTGAAA – 16 bp – CCCCATNTN3-10-T/A -35 -10 +1 s54 GG – N12 – GC/T – 12bp – A -24 -12 +1

  12. Some s70 promoters in E.coli The –35 and –10 sequences of individual s factors are conserved (yellow boxes) The spacer sequence between –35 and –10 is not conserved, but the spacer length is 171 bp

  13. The 3D structure of bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme s3 s factor domains : N-term s1 Inhibition s2 -10 binding s3 -10 binding s4 -35 binding

  14. The UP element RNAP RNAP a NTD • UP element is an AT rich motif present in some strong (e.g. rRNA) promoters • UP element interacts directly with C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase a subunits s a CTD s4 s2-3 UP -35 -10 +1

  15. Constitutive and inducible promoters • Certain genes are transcribed at all times and circumstances -Examples – tRNAs, rRNAs, ribosomal proteins, RNA polymerase -Promoters of those genes are called constitutive • Most genes, however, need to be transcribed only under certain circumstances or periods in cell life cycles -The promoters of those genes are called inducible and they are subject to up- and down- regulation

  16. Regulation at promoters • Promoters can be regulated by repression and/or activation • Many s70 promoters are controlled both by repression and activation, whereas, for example s54 promoters are controled solely by activation

  17. Mechanisms of repression • Repression by steric hindrance • Inhibition of transition to open complex • Inhibition of promoter clearance • Anti-activation • Anti-sigma factors

  18. a) Repression by steric hindrance (most cases) • Examples: Trp repressor, lac repressor

  19. b) Inhibition of transition to open complex • RNA Polymerase – s complex (RNAP-s) can bind to promoter, but transition to open complex is blocked

  20. c) Inhibition of promoter clearance • The transcription bubble can be formed, but further RNAP-s movement is blocked

  21. e) Anti-sigma factors • An anti-s factor is defined by the ability toprevent its cognate s factor to compete for core RNA polymerase • Mostly used for s factors, other than s70, for example in life cycle regulation (sporulation, etc) • Some bacteriophages use their own anti-s factors to prevent expression of cellular proteins RNAP RNAP anti-s s s -10 -35 -10 -35

  22. d) Anti-activation • Repressor molecule removes the activator RNA pol - s Activator ABS weak promoter +1 Activator binding sequence Activator RNA pol - s Repressor ABS weak promoter +1

  23. Two examples of steric hindrance • Trp repressor • Lac repressor

  24. In the absence of tryptophane the trp repressor (red blob) shows no affinity to promoter (black box) and the RNA polymerase (yellow blob) transcribes the operon When enough tryptophane (blue dots) is made, it binds to repressor, which now is able to bind to promoter and block RNA polymerase binding The tryptophan repressor • The trp repressor controls the operon for the synthesis of L-tryptophan in E.coli by a simple negative feedback loop

  25. The 3-D structure of trp repressor

  26. The conformational change upon binding tryptophan molecules induces a conformational change in trp repressor

  27. The lac promoter Lac promoter is widely used in artifical plasmids, designed for protein production For practical purposes it is easier to use non-hydrolyzable lactose analog – IPTG (isopropyl-b-thiogalactoside) instead of native lactose

  28. The structure of lac repressor monomer Hinge helix DNA binding domain Core N subdomain Inducer binding pocket Core C subdomain Tetramerization helix

  29. Functional lac repressor is a homotetramer • Each dimer binds to a distinct DNA sequence at –82 and +11 respective to transcription start site • This results in DNA looping, preventing the DNA polymerase from binding to –35 and –10 sequences +11 -82 -35 -10 -82 +11 lac repressor

  30. The lac repressor binds both to major and minor grooves of DNA

  31. A cartoon, ilustrating events upon IPTG binding to lac repressor (IPTG) As IPTG binds, the DNA binding domains scissor apart

  32. Mechanisms of activation • a) Regulated recruitment • b) Polymerase activation • c) Promoter activation

  33. a) Regulated recruitment • Activator “extends” the binding site for RNA polymerase strong or weak affinity RNA pol - s Activator ABS weak promoter +1 strong affinity weak affinity

  34. Catabolite Activator Protein: CAP • Activates transcription from more than 150 promoters in E.coli • Upon activation by cAMP (cyclic Adenosine MonoPhosphate), CAP binds to promoter and helps RNAP-s to bind as well • All CAP–dependent promoters have weak –35 sequence, so that RNAP-s is unable to bind the promoter without CAP assistance

  35. Models for Class I and Class II promoter activation Class I CAP binding sites can be from –62 to –103. CAP interacts with the carboxy terminal domain of the RNAP a-subunit (aCTD) Class II CAP binding sites usually overlap the –35. CAP interacts with the aCTD, aNTD (N-terminal domain), and the s factor Busby and Ebright, 2000, J. Mol. Biol. 293:199-213

  36. Model for Class III promoter activation • Activation of Class III promoters requires binding of at least two CAP dimers or at least one CAP dimer and one regulation-specific activator • Interactions can be similar to those of ClassI and/or ClassII promoters, except that each aCTD subunit is making different interactions

  37. 80º 3-D structure of CAP-cAMP-DNA complex Binding of CAP causes DNA bending by 80º C C Cyclic AMP binds to the N-terminal domain and causes the two long “C” helices to reorient and move the DNA binding domains apart, so that CAP can bind to DNA

  38. CAP activates lac operon

  39. DNA binding domain of AraC AraC RNAP-s promoter + arabinose ( ) Transcription RNAP-s AraC – repressor and activator of arabinose promoter

  40. Structure of AraC dimers in presence (A) and absence (B) of arabinose • Without arabinose, the monomers interact with the b barrel domains. An important interaction is stacking of Tyr31 of one subunit on Trp 95 of the other • Arabinose binds in close proximity to Trp95, making the stacking interaction impossible Monomers associate in a different way – 4 helix bundle interactions by the helical domains

  41. b) Polymerase activation • This works for s54 promoters • RNAP-s54 forms a stable complex with DNA, but needs to be activated to form an open complex

  42. RNAP-s54 activation • RNAP-s54 open complex formation requires ATP hydrolysis • Activator protein with ATP-ase activity binds to “enhancer” site about 160 bp upstream from –24 sequence. DNA then gets looped and activator interacts with RNAP-s54 resulting in the open bubble formation upon ATP hydrolysis ATP+Pi ATP s54 s54

  43. c) Example of promoter activation: MerR activator family • MerR is an activator that controls genes involved in the response to mercury poisoning • Other MerR family activators (CueR, BmrR, etc) respond to a variety of different toxic compounds such as other heavy metal atoms or drugs • In MerR activated promoters, -10 and –35 regions are separated by 19bp instead of optimal 17bp

  44. The BmrR-DNA-drug complex • BmrR binds to a variety of toxic compounds, including tetraphenylphosphine (TPP) • Both TPP bound and unbound forms of BmrR bind to promoter, but only TPP bound form induces transcription

  45. In 19-bp spacer variant, -35 and –10 binding regions not only are too far from each other, but also on the opposite sides of double helix • In BmrR-TPP bound vairiant, DNA double helix is underwound, so that –10 and –35 regions are at the same distance as in regular 17-bp spacer

  46. Transcription termination • In prokaryotes two types of transcription termination occur – rho indepedent termination and rho dependent termination • In rho independent case, the termination is achieved by a secondary structure of mRNA – RNA stem-loop, followed by an AU rich region • A rho protein is required for rho-dependent termination

  47. Rho independent termination

  48. Attenuation • Regulation of transcriptionby thebehavior of ribosomes • Observed in bacteria, wheretranscription and translation aretightly coupled • Translation of a mRNA can occur asthe mRNA is being synthesized

  49. Attenuation in trp operon

More Related