1 / 16

Case study Kromhout Barracks

The Kromhout Barracks project in Utrecht aims to modernize facilities for 2000 Army Command Headquarters employees while adding 90 hotel rooms and sports facilities. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) seeks to focus on core tasks by leveraging a contractor's expertise, ensuring high-quality services and lower costs. This pilot PPP project follows a DBFMO model for 25 years, involving a competitive dialogue and economically advantageous tendering process with a budget of €335 million. The project spans multiple phases, culminating in long-term performance contracts.

badru
Télécharger la présentation

Case study Kromhout Barracks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Case studyKromhout Barracks Maarten Groothuis

  2. The Kromhout Barracks challenge • Army Command Headquarters and other MoD units • Location Utrecht • Offices for 2000 employees (+ option for extra 1000) • 90 hotel rooms, sport facilities, etc. • Services: maintenance, catering, security, facility management, etc.

  3. Ambitions for the project • MoD wants to focus on its core tasks • Benefiting contractor’s specialised knowledge and experience • Higher quality (“one stop shopping”), lower costs

  4. Approach • Pilot project for PPP in Defence • DBFMO for 25 years • European tender procedure: • Competitive dialogue • Maximum bid price • Economically most advantageous tender (EMAT) • Financial scope • DCF 335 million € • PPP savings exceed 15% • MoD is and will be owner • Performance-related availability fee

  5. Preparations Selection Procurement guidelines Dialogue Public Sector Comparator Final tender DBFMO Contract Contract close Output Specification Building Operation Process Winter 2005 - Summer 2006

  6. Preparations Selection Dialogue Final tender Contract close Building Operation Process Winter 2005 - Summer 2006 Autumn 2006

  7. Preparations Selection Phase 1 (5 participants) Dialogue Phase 2 (3 participants) Final tender Phase 3 (3 participants) Contract close Building Operation Process Winter 2005 - Summer 2006 Autumn 2006 2007

  8. Preparations Selection Dialogue Final tender Contract close Building Operation Process Winter 2005 - Summer 2006 Autumn 2006 2007 Final bid: 11 January 2008 Preferred bidder: 2 April

  9. Preparations Selection Dialogue Final tender Contract close Building Operation Process Winter 2005 - Summer 2006 Autumn 2006 2007 Final bid: 11 January 2008 Preferred bidder: 2 April Summer 2008

  10. Preparations Selection Dialogue Final tender Contract close Building Operation Process Winter 2005 - Summer 2006 Autumn 2006 2007 Final bid: 11 January 2008 Preferred bidder: 2 April Summer 2008 2008 - 2010

  11. Preparations Selection Dialogue Final tender Contract close Building Operation Process Winter 2005 - Summer 2006 Autumn 2006 2007 Final bid: 11 January 2008 Preferred bidder: 2 April Summer 2008 2008 - 2010 2010 - 2035

  12. Preferred bidder ‘Komfort’ 'AMB Kromhout' (Macquarie Bank, BAM, Arcadis, GTI, Unica and Kraaijvanger Urbis) 'Integra Partners Kromhout' (Heijmans, NIBC Infrastructure, Burgers Ergon, Facilicom, Quadrat and Broekbakema) 'Komfort' (Ballast Nedam, Strukton and John Laing, in cooperation with Meyer en Van Schooten Architecten, Karres en Brands Landschapsarchitecten and ISS Nederland BV. 12 12

  13. Design 13 13

  14. Impression 14 14

  15. Case study: stakeholder analysis

  16. Questions?

More Related