1 / 0

Contract Drafting Class 7 Tues Feb 7

Contract Drafting Class 7 Tues Feb 7. University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III. In the news …. Common contract f***-ups. Common contract f***-ups.

badu
Télécharger la présentation

Contract Drafting Class 7 Tues Feb 7

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Contract DraftingClass 7Tues Feb 7

    University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III

  2. In the news …

  3. Common contract f***-ups

  4. Common contract f***-ups “10. The contract that is signed with an illegible signature and no information is given as to who has signed or their position within the organisation.” [From “Top 10 howlers when preparing contracts for signature,” by the IP Draughts blog at http://goo.gl/Km6Dw.]

  5. Drafting exercise: Stark 18-5

  6. Microsoft NDA – general provisions

  7. Assignment of K – Port of NY & NJ
  8. Section 4(g) – assignment of K QUESTION: Are most contracts ordinarily assignable if K doesn’t say otherwise? Yes No Yes, with some exceptions IP licenses Special situations (e.g., unique capabilities / personal trust & confidence)
  9. Assignment of K (Z&B pp. 23-26) QUESTION: Why might a party want to restrict the other side’s assignability? (Think of both business reasons and “because I can” reasons.)
  10. Assignment of K (Z&B pp. 23-26) QUESTION: Why might a company wantto refuse to agree to an assignment-consent requirement in a draft contract? Don’t want to have to get consent to spin off a division or other future M&A deals Requirement would cause tax problems Might want to move contract rights to affiliate Requirement would cause antitrust problems
  11. Assignment of K (Z&B pp. 23-26) QUESTION: Why might a software vendor want its customers to be able to assign their license agreements? Hint: If a customer had to pay a large fee for consent to assign, what might it decide to do instead? Would the vendor’s competitors have anything to “contribute” to the customer’s thinking process?
  12. Assignment of K (Z&B pp. 23-26) FACTS: You’re entering into a contract with an agency of the State of New York. QUESTION: Is there any way around the state-law assignment-consent requirement? Hint: See NYState Finance Law art. 9, § 138
  13. Assignment of K (Z&B pp. 23-26) CONTRACT PROVISION: “Customer may not assign this Agreement, including for example by operation of law (for example, as the result of a merger), without Vendor’s prior written consent.” [Questions follow on subsequent slides]
  14. Assignment of K (Z&B pp. 23-26) CONTRACT PROVISION: “Customer may not assign this Agreement, including for example by operation of law (for example, as the result of a merger), without Vendor’s prior written consent.” QUESTION: If Customer merges with another company without consent, is the merger void?
  15. Assignment of K (Z&B pp. 23-26) CONTRACT PROVISION: “Customer may not assign this Agreement, including for example by operation of law (for example, as the result of a merger), without Vendor’s prior written consent.” QUESTION: What if the contract provision were like Microsoft NDA § 4(g) [Z&B p. 20]?
  16. Assignment of K (Z&B pp. 23-26) CONTRACT PROVISION: “Customer may not assign this Agreement, including for example by operation of law (for example, as the result of a merger), without Vendor’s prior written consent.” QUESTION: What additional language might Customer want to negotiate, and why? (Hint: See the subheading “Assignment with transfer of business assets” at http://goo.gl/26MEx.)
  17. Third-party beneficiaries (Z&B p. 20 § 4(b); pp. 27-28) FACTS: 1. Sam signs a contract to sell Betty his car for $2,000. 2. Betty fails to pay. 3. As a result, Sam can’t pay his rent. 4. Sam’s landlord sues Betty as 3PB. [Questions follow on subsequent slides]
  18. Third-party beneficiaries (Z&B p. 20 § 4(b); pp. 27-28) FACTS: 1. Sam signs a contract to sell Betty his car for $2,000. 2. Betty fails to pay. 3. As a result, Sam can’t pay his rent. 4. Sam’s landlord Larry sues Betty as 3PB. QUESTION: Betty files MSJ - what result? MSJ denied – Larry was a 3PB MSJ deferred for further discovery Betty wins – Larry was only incidental 3PB
  19. Third-party beneficiaries (Z&B p. 20 § 4(b); pp. 27-28) FACTS: 1. Sam signs a contract to sell Betty his car for $2,000. 2. Betty fails to pay. 3. As a result, Sam can’t pay his rent. 4. Sam’s landlord Larry sues Betty as 3PB. QUESTION: What result if K said “Betty will pay $500 to Larry to take care of Sam’s back rent and the remaining $1,500 to Sam ….”?
  20. Review: No-oral-modification provisions (Z&B pp. 70-71) QUESTION: In a contract under NY law for the sale of 1,000 widgets, will a court enforce a no-oral-modification provision? No – past contract can’t prevent parties from agreeing to an amendment Yes – NY statute expressly validates Maybe, if no proof of estoppel
  21. Review: Signature line How would the signature block for Microsoft be written?

  22. End of class

More Related