1 / 15

NLDA and COSMOS How do they compare?

NLDA and COSMOS How do they compare? . Todd Caldwell Michael Young Bridget Scanlon Di Long . Soil Moisture Storage. Soil moisture is a large component of the water balance in Texas (676,000 km 2 ). WY05 +76.7 km 3 +6.2x10 7 ac- ft CY11 Drought -84.6 km 3 -6.8x10 7 ac- ft

bairn
Télécharger la présentation

NLDA and COSMOS How do they compare?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NLDA and COSMOSHow do they compare? Todd Caldwell Michael Young Bridget Scanlon Di Long

  2. Soil Moisture Storage Soil moisture is a large component of the water balance in Texas (676,000 km2) • WY05 • +76.7 km3 • +6.2x107 ac-ft • CY11 Drought • -84.6 km3 • -6.8x107 ac-ft • ±11 cm of water over TX

  3. Soil Moisture Modeling Soil moisture is enigmatic at large scales • Hard to quantify at basin+ scale • We need a means to estimate and predict • The simplification and numerical representation of our world in 1-D columns • North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) by NASA • A quality-controlled, and spatially and temporally consistent, land-surface multi-model (LSM) output from 1979 to present Loukili et at., doi:10.2136/vzj2007.00810

  4. Soil Representation in NLDAS CONUS-SOIL NLDAS ⅛° grid (~14 km) %Class over each grid Noah, Mosaic, VIC Uniform soil texture from top 5cm layer • STATSGO (1:250,000) • 1 km grid • Dominant soil series • 16 textural classes • 12 are actually soil • 11 layers to 2m depth Mitchel et al., 2004, JGR, D07S90, doi:10.1029 /2003JD003823. Miller and White, 1998, Earth Interactions, Paper 2-002.

  5. Soil Parameterization in NLDAS Mosaic and Noah • Soil hydraulic properties for 12 soil classes • Mosaic PTF (Rawls et al., 1982) • Noah PTF (Crosby et al., 1984) • Flux between layers quasi-Richards’ equation • Uniform soil with depth • Textural class at 5cm extracted for whole soil column

  6. NLDAS-2 Data and Output • GRIB outputs at hourly and monthly values http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/hydrology/data-holdings • 52 Fields of parameters • Soil Moisture Storage (4): 0-0.1m, 0.1-0.4m, 0.4-1.0m and 1.0-2.0m Noah Output

  7. Operational Scale of NLDAS-2 4169 nodes in TX 627 nodes in Colorado River Basin NLDAS-2: ⅛° grid (~14 km), 224x464=104k nodes STATE WATERSHED

  8. Operational Scale of NLDAS-2 18 nodes in Travis County COUNTY SSURGO AWC(in) Austin

  9. Current of Soil Moisture and Climate Observatories in the State of Texas • USDA SCAN Sites • 140 nationally • 5 (4%) in Texas, ~9 planned • NOAA USCRN Sites • 144 nationally, 538 planned • 7 (5%) in Texas • NSF COSMOS Sites • 50 nationally, 450 planned • 2 (4%) in Texas • AmeriFlux Sites • 212 nationally • 3 (1%) in Texas, ? Planned • NEON? Freeman Ranch, TX

  10. SCAN Data and NLDAS in Texas • VWC at 0-10 cm ?? Missing storm? Missing data?

  11. SCAN Data and NLDAS in Texas • VWC at 0-10 cm

  12. A snapshot of COSMOS stations • NSF COSMOS Sites • Picked 6 of the oldest, more diverse station • Plus 2 in Texas • Not very scientific at this point • Extracted the daily mean of the Level 3, boxcar filtered hourly data (SM12H) • NLDAS-2 Model Data • Extracted nearest-node • Daily mean 0-10cm Freeman Ranch, TX

  13. COSMOS Data and NLDAS

  14. COSMOS Data and NLDAS

  15. So, how do they compare? • Modeler’s viewpoint: • Captures the soil moisture dynamics robustly, good correlation! • There’s a scale issue with the observational data • We need to refine our models and collect more data • Field hydrologist viewpoint: • Absolute values are way off, terrible correlation! • Non-synchronous and erroneous precipitation events • Oversimplified the soil system • We need to collect more data and refine our models • Personal viewpoint: • The models provide more spatiotemporal data then we can monitor • We can use the data to site future key monitoring locations (mean relative differences) • The monitored data shows inadequacies in model structure • We can update and refine the antiquated PTF through parameter optimization • We can develop downscaling algorithms to better assess model performance • We need to collect more data and refine our models • Soil moisture is the “first-in-time, first-in-right”

More Related