1 / 20

Fine structure, mass composition, peaks

Fine structure, mass composition, peaks. Л.Г.Свешникова. GAMMA F(E)/AE -2.9 -1 and TUNKA. STRUCTURE: F(E)/AE -3 -1 knees and pronounced peak ,. EAS TOP TUNKA. Kascade Grande. GAMMA F(E)/AE -3.0 -1. Tibet. MSU. Line- our model – one of calculated variants.

baka
Télécharger la présentation

Fine structure, mass composition, peaks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fine structure, mass composition, peaks Л.Г.Свешникова

  2. GAMMA F(E)/AE-2.9 -1 and TUNKA STRUCTURE: F(E)/AE-3 -1 knees and pronounced peak, EAS TOP TUNKA Kascade Grande GAMMA F(E)/AE-3.0 -1 Tibet MSU Line- our model – one of calculated variants

  3. 1. Type Ia SNRs (Emax~4Z PeV) with the following parameters: kinetic energy of explosion E = 1051erg, number density of the surrounding interstellar gas n = 0.1 cm−3, and mass of ejecta Mej = 1.4Ms can accelerate particles to the energy of the knee. 2. Type Ib/c SNRs (Emax~1Z PeV) with E = 1051 erg exploding into the low density bubble with density n = 0.01 cm−3 formed by a progenitor star as a Wolf-Rayet star. The ejecta mass is Mej = 2Ms and k = 7. 3. Type IIP SNRs (Emax~0.1Z PeV) with parameters E=1051erg, n = 0.1 cm−3, Mej = 8M, and k = 12. 4. Type IIb SNRs(Emax~600Z PeV) with E = 31051erg,n = 0.01cm−3, and Mej = 1Ms. Before entering the rarefied bubble, the blast wave goes through the dense wind emitted by the progenitor star during its final RSG stage of evolution. It was assumed that the mass loss rate by the wind is M˙ = 10−4M yr−1 and the outer wind radius is 5 pc. Basic MODEL:V. Ptuskin, V. Zirakashvili, and Eun-Suk Seo, Spectrum of galactic cosmic rays accelerated in supernova remnants. Astrophysical J. T. 718 p. 31–36.Several types of SNR: In this model sources are distributed continiously, the random nature of sources Is not considered

  4. Extension of this model takes into account a statistical nature of sources: Nearby (Rnear~1.-1.5 кпс) and Young Tnear~105 лет) are taken from gamma astronomy catalogs Distant and old sources are simulated randomly The propagation time of 4 PeV protons is around 104 years (less than survival time of shells and PWNs, so we try to identify gamma-atronomy detected source and cosmic ray source.

  5. Additional suggestings: • All SNR Ia (thermonuclear explosions accelerate up to Emax =4 PeV (23%) • Collapsing SNR II, SNIbc have distributed Emax from 1 TeV to 1000 TeV: This results in additional d ~0.17, and observed near Earth obs= sour + d+ dprop ~2.705 sour=2.2. 3) and 2-5 % SNIIn accelerated up to 6 1017 eV. 3) Chemical composition: 37% of H, 35% of He, 8% CNO, 10% of CNO, 8 % of intermediate nuclei, 10% of Fe.

  6. Spectrum without propagation • Structures can be explained only if the cutoff in source spectrum is strong d>2.5-3.0 • Fe - peak can be explained only if we suggest “bump” before cutoff energy Main variant

  7. Total all particle spectrum in our model ( F(E)*E3) has fine structures • 1) bump around 4 PeV is produced by proton and helium nuclei with nearly equal abundances • 2) concavity above 1016 eV denotes the transition to CNO and more heavier nuclei, the amount of Fe nuclei at that should be not less than 1/3 of He nuclei. • 3) sharp break around the 108 GeV marks the transition to the contribution of rare SNIIb being able to accelerate protons up to 6x1017 eV comprising the several percents among all SNR. The slope of spectrum (-3.24+-0.08 in KG) in the model is connected with the slope of cutoff. • 4) If we exclude SNIIb we can not describe the flat spectrum above the 1016 eV. • 5) Two variant of calculation: Main 1 (absence of SNRs in the Earth vicinity with Emax=4 PeV) and Main 2 (where 4 SNRs accelerate to 4 PeV) give more or less similar structures around the knee Galactic sources Here we need to know MetaGalactic He P Fe C,O Si

  8. Contribution of nearby actual sources Variant 1: No one SNR <1 kpc can accelerate to 4 PeV Total contruution: 7% in total Variant 2: all pure shell SNRs < 1 kpc accelerate to 4 PeVTotal contribution 30% in total We did not find the actual single sources that can imitate the fine structure

  9. Variant without “bump” in source spectrum can not describe Fe-peak, but describe structures

  10. Variant with wide (0.5 order) “bump” in source spectrum can describe Fe-peak more or less

  11. Variant with narrow (0.25 order) “bump” in source spectrum can describe Fe-peak completely, but there is a some contradiction with the main knee – it becomes too narrow and with 2 ears

  12. Mass composition in 3-d variantcoincides with Tunka -133 last data

  13. Mass composition: 3 dif. variants • 1) Emax (P) In Galaxy ; 4 PeV • 2) Emax (P)=4 and 600 PeV This variant predicts a heavy composition at 1018 eV • 3) SNR Ia + He stars • +MetaGalactic with • mixed composition in • sources

  14. Implications of the cosmic ray spectrum for themass composition at the highest energiesD. Allard1, N. G. Busca1, G. Decerprit1, A. V. Olinto1;2, E.Parizot1 Figure 3. Propagated spectra obtained assuming a mixed source composition compared to HiRes (left) and Auger (right) spectra, the dierent components are displayed .

  15. Variant with Meta-galactic with mixed composition and with He-stars (without heavy nuclei) instead of SNIIn

  16. Amplitude and Right ascensionof anisotropy around the knee

  17. Conclusions about Fe-peak • To get in our calculations Fe-peak we need to introduce some bump in source spectrum with a width 0.3 or 0.1 of the order. Single nearby source could not help in this problem. • First a very impressive fact – a very good coincidence of positions of the Fe peak and position of P-He main knee at the suggestion of normal composition. • In the case of narrow peak (1/10 of order) Fe peak is reproduced perfectly , but the main knee should be visible as two knees. May be if we take into account an accuracy of energy and mass determination, it helps to smooth these peaks. • The nature of the bump in a source spectrum is not clear fully. But it can reflect the time dependent emissions – most energetic particles are emitted at the beginning of the acceleration process, when the speed of shock wave is maximal. This bump should be seen during 104 ears (time of collecting of PeV signal from the sources due to propagation) and should be variable in the time .

  18. Propagation Time for different energies We can identified

  19. Используемый наборпотенциальных источников КЛ. • Всего 25 с R <1.5 кпс и T<105 лет (всего 73 до 3 кпс) • Чистые SNR 6 (без пульсаров, похожие на сверхновые Ia (25%). • В 19 есть либо PWN (11 штук) либо гамма-пульсар (11 штук), • Из 19 HESS зарегистрировал ТэВ-ное излучение только в 30 %, • Из 6 SNR - только в 1 (Только в J1713-3946) Тэвное излучение.

  20. Приложение I.

More Related