540 likes | 737 Vues
What Happened to the Asian Miracle?. The Asian Tigers. Throughout the 1990s, Asian economies were reporting stellar rates of economic growth Per Capita income has increased by a factor of ten over the past 30 years.
E N D
The Asian Tigers • Throughout the 1990s, Asian economies were reporting stellar rates of economic growth • Per Capita income has increased by a factor of ten over the past 30 years. • Asian countries attracted over half of all capital inflows to developing countries
The Asian Tigers • Throughout the 1990s, Asian economies were reporting stellar rates of economic growth • Suddenly, however, in the summer of 1997, Thailand devalued the Baht followed by devaluations of the Philippine Peso, the the Malaysian Ringgit, then the Indonesian Rupiah
The Asian Tigers • Throughout the 1990s, Asian economies were reporting stellar rates of economic growth • Suddenly, however, in the summer of 1999, Thailand devalued the Baht; followed by devaluations of the Philippine peso, the the Malaysian Ringgit, then the Indonesian Rupiah • Following the devaluation, the region suffered a major contraction and persistently lower rates of economic growth.
Why did Asia Collapse • Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad has been the wild man of the Asian crisis, blaming all his problems on manipulations by Jewish speculators • Was the Asian Crisis due to irrational speculation or were there real structural problems in Asia?
The Good News • On the surface, the Asian economies looked very strong • High rates of economic growth • High labor productivity growth • High rates if investment financed by high domestic savings • Low government deficits
More Good News • Asian Stock and Real Estate Markets were booming
However, underneath the good news…… • Was Asian growth due to “inspiration” or “perspiration”?
However, underneath the good news…… • Was Asian growth due to “inspiration” or “perspiration”? • All the Asian countries had very high rated f labor productivity growth, where labor productivity is defined as LP = Y/L (real output per labor hour) • This measure of productivity omits an important input
Sources of Economic Growth • Recall, that we assumed three basic inputs to production
Sources of Economic Growth • Recall, that we assumed three basic inputs to production • Capital (K) • Labor (L) • Technology (A)
Sources of Economic Growth • Recall, that we assumed three basic inputs to production • Capital (K) • Labor (L) • Technology (A) • Growth accounting attempts to separate the growth effects of each input
Step 1: Estimate capital/labor share of income K = 30% L = 70% Growth Accounting
Step 1: Estimate capital/labor share of income K = 30% L = 70% Step 2: Estimate capital, labor, and output growth %Y = 5 %K = 3 %L = 1 Growth Accounting
Step 1: Estimate capital/labor share of income K = 30% L = 70% Step 2: Estimate capital, labor, and output growth %Y = 5 %K = 3 %L = 1 Productivity growth will be the residual output growth after correcting for inputs Growth Accounting
Step 1: Estimate capital/labor share of income K = 30% L = 70% Step 2: Estimate capital, labor, and output growth %Y = 5% %K = 3% %L = 1% Productivity growth will be the residual output growth after correcting for inputs %A = %Y – (.3)*(%K) – (.7)*(%L) Growth Accounting
Step 1: Estimate capital/labor share of income K = 30% L = 70% Step 2: Estimate capital, labor, and output growth %Y = 5 %K = 3 %L = 1 Productivity growth will be the residual output growth after correcting for inputs %A = %Y – (.3)*(%K) – (.7)*(%L) %A = 5 – (.3)*(3) + (.7)*(1) = 3.4% Growth Accounting
Productivity Growth in Thailand • Labor productivity growth in Thailand averaged around 15% in the 90’s, but how much of this was technological? • %Y = 8 • %L = 3 • %K = 40
Productivity Growth in Thailand • Labor productivity growth in Thailand averaged around 15% in the 90’s, but how much of this was technological? • %Y = 8 • %L = 3 • %K = 40 %A = 8 – (.7)(3) – (.3)(40) = -6
The Bad News • The growth in Thailand was attracting lots of foreign investment and was fueling an investment boom. • This boom was largely debt financed • However, without technological improvement, this growth is not sustainable.
Asian Financing • While these countries did have high domestic savings rates, much of the financing came from overseas
Asian Financing • While these countries did have high domestic savings rates, much of the financing came from overseas • Further, a large fraction of this debt (20-70%) was short term.
Asian Financing: Moral Hazard • A further complication was that the Asian governments implicitly backed all private sector loans. This exacerbates the natural moral hazard problem already present in financial markets
The Beginning of the End • By the mid nineties, the profitability of Asian companies began to fall
The Beginning of the End • By the mid nineties, the profitability of Asian companies began to fall • As profits fell, loan defaults increased
To Make Matters Worse • Most countries were pegged to the dollar. As domestic inflation rates rose, they experienced a real appreciation against the US.
To Make Matters Worse • Most countries were pegged to the dollar. As domestic inflation rates rose, they experienced a real appreciation against the US. • As the dollar appreciated against the Yen, so did the Baht, Ringgit, etc.
To Make Matters Worse • Most countries were pegged to the dollar. As domestic inflation rates rose, they experienced a real appreciation against the US. • As the dollar appreciated against the Yen, so did the Baht, Ringgit, etc. • Japan slid into a recession in the early nineties.
Liquidity Problems • With exports falling, there was insufficient cash to refinance short term borrowing • Further, many of these loans were dollar denominated, which put additional strain on dollar reserves (to maintain the peg)
Why not float? • With many loans denominated in dollars, a currency depreciation raises the value of the loan in domestic currency. • Domestic interest rates would have to be raised to attract capital (interest rates would need to compensate for the currency depreciation)
Is maintaining the peg better? • Not really…….by maintaining the peg to the dollar, the central bank must continue to buy up domestic currency which contracts the domestic money supply.
Enter the IMF • As the Asian debts piled up, the IMF (International Monetary Fund) intervened. The offered emergency loans, but with strings attached.
Enter the IMF • As the Asian debts piled up, the IMF (International Monetary Fund) intervened. The offered emergency loans, but with strings attached.