170 likes | 187 Vues
Development of models of intrabeam scattering for charged beams in storage rings. E. Mikhaylova. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia. The First seminar of FRRC Fellows FAIR Moscow, June, 9 – 10, 2009. BETACOOL application over the world (since 1995). TSL, Uppsala
E N D
Development of models of intrabeam scattering for charged beams in storage rings E. Mikhaylova Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia The First seminar of FRRC Fellows FAIR Moscow, June, 9 – 10, 2009
BETACOOL application over the world (since 1995) TSL, Uppsala MSL, Stockholm JINR, Dubna ITEP, Moscow ITMP, Sarov BINP, Novosibirsk FZJ, Jülich GSI, Darmstadt Erlangen Univ. MPI, Heidelberg CERN, Geneva München Univ. Fermilab, Batavia BNL, Upton Tech-X, Boulder RIKEN, Wako NIRS, Chiba Kyoto Univ. Hiroshima Univ. Beijing Univ. IMP, Lanzhou http://lepta.jinr.ru/betacool.htm
FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research Rare-Isotope Production Target Antiproton Production Target What have we done for FAIR? SIS 100/300 UNILAC SIS 18 ESR HESR: PANDA PAX Super FRS RESR CR FLAIR 100 m NESR
BETACOOL for FAIR ESR – experiments with electron cooling and gas cell target, ordered beams, injection with RF system, etc. SIS18 – estimation of electron cooling NESR – accumulation with electron cooling HESR – optimization of electron cooling system PANDA – effective luminosity with internal pellet target PAX – optimization of colliding experiment with electron cooling system FLAIR – optimization of electron cooling
The general goal Simulation of long-term processes How long? What is it? In comparison with the ion revolution period Processes which lead to variation of the ion distribution function in 6 dimensional phase space: cooling processes, IBS We can do the simulation on condition that: The ion beam motion inside a storage ring is supposed to be stable and is treated in linear approximation Linear matrixes
Advantages • Many different effects (ECOOL, IBS, Target, RestGas etc.) can be simulated simultaneously at the same parameters using different algorithms • Fast estimations on PC • Graphical interface under Windows • Control the results and vary parameters during simulation
Model Beam algorithm Ion beam is presented by array of model particles. Way What is it? Each effect calculates a kick of the ion momentum components and changes the particle number Model particles have the same mass and charge as real particles, BUT number of model particles is much less than real particle number We take into account effects of particle loss How to do it To numerical solve Langevin equation Acting forces (cooling forces) Initial model particle momentum Coefficients of diffusion
Principle of growth rates calculation Model particles increase in calculation speed Distribution over the coordinates and velocities Gaussian shape IBS growth rates
4 analytical models of IBS Works with average parameters of ring Integrates over each optic element Simplified version for high energy storage ring Does not describe relaxation between degrees of freedom • Piwinski • 2. Martini • 3. Jie Wei • 4. Gas Relaxation Which model of IBS do we prefer? Martini model As the most accurate model (need more simulation time) BUT! There is an irregular dependence on an integration step A special program code was created in order to investigate the integrals and the all integrands
Martini Model We use Martini model for calculation of the growth rates. According to this model we have tocalculate some functions to find characteristic times We calculate growth rates in momentum space. But it is better to transfer rectangular coordinates to cylindrical coordinates in order to simplify some calculations. According to this transformation the necessary functions will look like this:
IBS Program Code The IBS program code was created in order to investigate the integrals and the all integrands What happens? theD(μ,ν)value at some beam parameters can be close to zero: critical points
Variable step near critical points Constant step The problem is that The result of calculations can depend on number of integration stepsa lot!!! How to escape? To use a variable integration step
Comparison of Results We made calculations for a single lattice element of a ring in order to check IBS Program work • BETACOOL • 2. Mathematica Coincidence with a sufficient accuracy With help of BETACOOL Comparisons with experimental data now
Application of IBS Program Why should we use it? • IBS is an independent program for everybodywho wants • to calculate the IBS rates in storage rings • 2. A simple way of calculations of IBS growth rates • 3. Comfortable graphical interface under Windows • 4. Possibility of getting a ring lattice structure from a MAD file • 5. The IBS program will appear on the Internet soon as a public resource + • library of Martini integral calculations. • http://lepta.jinr.ru/ • 6. We changed object-oriented structure of the program to • procedure one in order to other programmers could use • it for them own program codes
My plans for FAIR I suppose to do in the future : • Improvement of numerical models of electron and stochastic cooling in common with the University of Tokyo and scientific centre GSI and FZ-Juelich (calculations of cooling processers and balance with intrabeam scattering for NESR, HESR) • Beam dynamics simulation for NESR and HESR storage rings (calculation of charge particle accumulation process for NESR) • Beam dynamics simulation for FLAIR project (calculation of cooling process for LSR, USR)