1 / 10

Methodology

Methodology. 803 telephone interviews were conducted among a random sample of Nevada voters between February 17 and 22, 2011. The margin of error for the full statewide sample is plus-or-minus 3.4 percent at the 95 percent confidence level.

barbie
Télécharger la présentation

Methodology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Methodology • 803 telephone interviews were conducted among a random sample of Nevada voters between February 17 and 22, 2011. • The margin of error for the full statewide sample is plus-or-minus 3.4 percent at the 95 percent confidence level. • One-in-five respondents took the survey on a cell phone.

  2. More than four-in-five supportthe Nevada Clean Indoor Air Actwhen described In 2006, the Nevada Clean Indoor Air Act went into effect that eliminates exposure to secondhand smoke in most workplaces and indoor public places in Nevada, including offices, restaurants, bars, grocery stores and convenient stores. Would you say that you support this law, or are you against it? TotalSupport 82% Total Against 15% Q2.

  3. Three-in-ten now go to placesthey did not before since the Clean Indoor Air Act passed Do you go to places now that you did not go to before the Nevada Clean Indoor Air Act was passed? Q4.

  4. Nearly three-fourths feel they are less exposed to secondhand smoke sincethe Clean Indoor Air Act passed Do you feel you are less exposed to secondhand smoke since the Nevada Clean Indoor Air Act was passed? Q5.

  5. Half say going out is now much more enjoyable since restaurants and other places have become smoke-free Since restaurants and other social places in Nevada are now smoke-free, would you say that going out has become a more enjoyable experience, a less enjoyable experience, or has it made no difference to you? TotalMore Enjoyable 64% TotalLess Enjoyable4% Q8.

  6. An overwhelming majority believe it is important to have a smoke-free environment in all workplaces and indoor public places How important is it to you to have a smoke-free environment in all workplaces and indoor public places in Nevada? Is it very important, somewhat important, or not at all important? Total Important86% Q7.

  7. A similarly large majority agrees that all Nevada workers should be protected from exposure to secondhand smoke Would you say that you would agree or disagree that all Nevada workers should be protected from exposure to secondhand smoke in the workplace? TotalAgree 83% Total Disagree 14% Q9.

  8. By nearly an 8-to-1 margin, voters believe the rights of customers/employees to breathe clean air outweighs rights of smokers • Please indicate which ONE of the following you think is more important: • The rights of customers and employees to breathe clean air in restaurants and bars • The rights of smokers to smoke inside restaurants and bars TotalRights of Employees/Customers79% Total Rights Of Smokers 11% Q12.

  9. Majorities agree with restricting smoking in several kindsof places in Nevada 17a-d. Each of the following statements is a proposal to restrict smoking in specific areas or places. Please say whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with the proposal.

More Related