E N D
1. Driver Licensure C. Raymond Bingham
rbingham@umich.edu
2. Overview History of US Driver Licensure
History of US Driver Education
Progress in Licensure and Safety
4. History of Driver Licensure Initial motivation
In some cases due to safety concerns
Most cases apparently to raise revenue
Drive license examination required later
Early licenses cost $0.50 (6.31 2009 USD)
Licenses issued at gas stations
Washington requirement in 1921
Applicant provided two signatures:
indicating they were competent drivers; and
no physical problems that would impair driving
5. History of Vehicle Registration Initial motivation to raise revenue
Safety inspection of vehicles not required until much later
New York was -- $1.00 (26.13 2009 USD)
954 vehicles registered in 1901
128 more in 1902
Issued as a metal disc motorist carried in their pocket
6. History of Driver Education Rarely offered prior to 1937
C.E. Minnick
1938, 18 schools in Maryland, 1000 students
1940
American Association of School Administrators
Yearbook Commission
Recommended safety education in schools
Specific inclusion of driver education
First recognition of need for safety education by profession
7. History of Driver Education Resulted in broad acceptance by school administrators
1947, >3000 schools, nearly 200,000 students
1965, >13,000 schools, >1.7 million students
68% offering 30 and 6 courses
National Conference on Driver Education recommended a full semester
8. History of Driver Education Effectiveness
Early evaluations encouraging
Studies made support the position that those completing a high school driver education course experience fewer accidents and/or are convicted of fewer violations than their age-mates not completing such an instructional program.
(Source: Hartman, C H., 1969; Driver Education in the Schools)
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has taken the position that a quality High School Driver Education (HSDE) program is capable of a 10-15% effect in terms of reducing the probability of crash involvement among persons exposed to it.
(Source: 1976, The Driver Education Evaluation Program (Deep) Study. A Report To The Congress)
9. History of Driver Education Effectiveness Evaluations
Many conducted by proponents of Driver Ed
Little reliance on statistical comparisons
Poorly controlled or completely uncontrolled
Criteria used were not consistent
No agreement on what outcomes to use
No standard approach to measuring outcomes
No consistency in the calculation and use of rates versus raw frequencies
10. History of Driver Education Effectiveness
DeKalb Study (1983)
Funded by NHTSA, conducted by Batelle
Many confounding variables
Did not support a safety effect
Recent reviews continue showing no safety effect of Driver Ed.
(Source: Vernick, J. et al., 1999; Effects of high school driver education on motor vehicle crashes, violations, and licensure)
What effect might Driver Ed. be having?
Standardization of understanding of laws
More predictable driving behavior
Should Driver Ed. have a safety effect?
11. Progress in Licensure and Safety Lots of variation in licensing laws
Driver education optional
Provisions for early licensure
Earlier licensure correlates with higher crash rates
Twenty-two states have laws providing for the issuance of a license to a person under the usual minimum licensing age if he has successfully completed an approved driver education course.
(Source: 1967; Lower Licensing Age for Driver Education Students)
12. Progress in Licensure and Safety Teen crash rate patterns predictable
The need for instruction of youth and for adult supervision and monitoring of new young drivers for extended periods after licensing
(Source: NTSB, 1971; Special Study - Youth and Traffic Safety Education.)
Roberts noted (1981) that:
Adult presence associated with lower crash rate;
Recommended a higher licensure age and a nighttime restriction
(Source: Roberts, L.A.; Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law)
New Jersey's 17-year-old licensing law associated with reduced fatal crash involvement.
Estimated 65 to 85 percent reduction in fatal crash involvement if the licensing age is increased from 16 to 17
Without increasing fatal crash rates at older ages
(Source: Williams, A.F. et al., 1983; American Journal of Public Health)
13. Progress in Licensure and Safety The concept of a graduated licensing system was first described by Pat Waller
Idea based on research conducted at the University of North Carolina in 1970s.
NHTSA developed model system in 1977. Never adopted at that time
(Source: Simpson, H.M., 2003; Journal of Safety Research)
14. Progress in Licensure and Safety Currently:
Continued variation in driver licensure laws
Parent-taught
Discussion of providing DE over the Internet
49 states and DC have some form of GDL in place.
Still, many are GDL in name only
Short holding periods
Short restriction intervals
Weak restrictions
Michigan, sadly, is falling behind other states
15. Now What? Weve come a long way
We have a long way to go
Should consider role and expectations of Driver Education
GDL is promising
Jean Shope will provide more info on GDL this afternoon
Stay tuned!