1 / 10

ESPON project 1.2.3 Identification of Spatially Relevant Aspects of the Information Society

ESPON project 1.2.3 Identification of Spatially Relevant Aspects of the Information Society. TPG. Spatial and analytical steps of proposed methodology. Research hypotheses. Though the IS can be characterised through a number of features, they will vary between different types of regions.

barr
Télécharger la présentation

ESPON project 1.2.3 Identification of Spatially Relevant Aspects of the Information Society

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ESPON project 1.2.3Identification of Spatially Relevant Aspectsof the Information Society TPG

  2. Spatial and analytical steps of proposed methodology

  3. Research hypotheses • Though the IS can be characterised through a number of features, they will vary between different types of regions. • Even within one type of region, the features can at least partly vary due to different niches of specialisation. • The development of an IS depends to a great extent on the role of the state, and on its tendency to supports the creation of adequate prerequisites for the IS. • The role of human capital and adequate and flexible education systems becomes increasingly important in IS development. • Backward, peripheral and other disadvantaged regions have lesser chances to catch up and accelerate growth because important prerequisites like e.g. ICT networks are lacking there. • Depending on the level of economic development, regions in different geographical parts of Europe are not equally affected by the spatial impacts of the IS. Centralisation-decentralisation tendencies vary. • While metropolitan regions basically are the best prepared for the restructuring towards a KBE and IS, their success varies in dependence of the persistence of structures created in the industrial society and the ability for stimulating the restructuring processes.

  4. Key findings - The composite IS index IS in Europe basedon e-Europe (2004) and NRI (2005) A comparison of e-Europe and NRI indices in ESPON countries

  5. Level of IS activity Time Key findings – The stages of IS development in Europe Life-cycle of the IS

  6. Key findings – towards typologies on the IS

  7. Key findings – national case studies results • 6 countries delivered their country studies before SIR, • Limited to descriptive part in SIR, • Indicators used on regional level + main findings • Appendixes Case studies template • Description of IS state and trends within a given country based on the set of common indicators within three categories: 1) Technological dimension 2) Economical dimension 3) Social dimension b. Analysis of policy documents related to IS development: • ICT related • R&D related • other relevant

  8. Pirkanmaa (NUTS 2&3 region) Rural Tuttlingen / Sigmaringen (NUTS 3 region) Rural (not FUA) Podlaskie Voivodship (NUTS 2&3 region) Rural Budapest (NUTS 2&3 region) MEGA South Moravia (NUTS 3 region) FUA Western Macedonia (NUTS 2 region) Geographically handicapped Rome (NUTS 3 region) MEGA Regional case studies selection

  9. Next working steps – towards FR (31th May 2006) TPG meeting – 3rd-4th March - Budapest • Indicators and regionalised data • updating table of data availability for whole ESPON space (29 countries) • Qualitative analysis • development of ESPON 1.2.3 IS index (lifecycle framework-measure different stages of IS: readiness, growth, impact; NUTS2); • Case studies • national case studies improvements • preparation of three questionnaires for different groups of respondents (public administration on regional level, school administration on regional level and schools, business organizations) + e-mail questionnaire (enterprises) • conducting research and developing regional case studies • Policy recommendations • development of policy recommendations

  10. Thank you for your attention!

More Related