1 / 9

Civil Society Index 2006

Civil Society Index 2006. 2. ENVIRONMENT. 2. ENVIRONMENT. To what extent is the external environment disabling / enabling the development of civil society? 2.1. Political context 2.2. Basic freedoms & rights 2.3. Socio-economic context 2.4. Socio-cultural context

bator
Télécharger la présentation

Civil Society Index 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Civil Society Index2006 2. ENVIRONMENT

  2. 2. ENVIRONMENT • To what extent is the external environment disabling / enabling the development of civil society? • 2.1. Political context • 2.2. Basic freedoms & rights • 2.3. Socio-economic context • 2.4. Socio-cultural context • 2.5. Legal environment • 2.6. State-civil society relations • 2.7. Private sector-civil society relations • Score: 1.5 (Not disabling, nor enabling)

  3. 2.1. Political context • Score: 1.7(Somewhat enabling) • Political rights: Lack of full democracy; yet restrictions on people’s political rights are limited. • Political competition: Having three major parties; resources and the level of institutionalization of political parties are in no way comparable with the Western counterparts. • Rule of law: Society is governed by fair and predictable rules, which are generally abided by. • Corruption: A moderate level of corruption. • State effectiveness: Government bureaucracy is functional but some aspects of which are perceived to be insufficient. • Decentralisation: The decision making power have always been rather centralized.

  4. 2.2. Basic freedoms & rights • Score: 1.3 (Somewhat disabling) • Civil liberties:The protection of HK people’s basic rights and freedoms is guaranteed by the Basic Law. • Information rights: Citizens are allowed to get access to government documents, but the scope of which is limited. • Press freedom:Article 27 of the Basic Law: provide for the freedom of speech, and of the press and publication. Yet there are some violations of violations of press freedom (e.g. self-censoring).

  5. 2.3. Socio-economic context • Score: 2.0 (Somewhat enabling) • Poverty: HK is by no means a poor society • Civil war: None in the last five years. • Recent severe ethnic/religious conflict: None in the last five years. • Severe economic crisis:No debt problem. • Severe social crisis:SARS at spring of 2003. • Severe socio-economic inequities:Increase in the gap between the rich and the poor. • Pervasive adult illiteracy: Adult illiteracy rate aged 15 and above < 10%. • Lack of IT infrastructure:High prevalence on the use of IT.

  6. 2.4. Socio-cultural context • Score: 1.0 (Somewhat disabling) • Trust: A low level of general trust. • Tolerance: A low level of tolerance in the society. • Public spiritedness: A low level of public spiritedness in the society.

  7. 2.5. Legal environment • Score: 1.8(Somewhat enabling) • CSO registration: The CSO registration process can be judged as relatively supportive. • Allowable advocacy activities: Constraints on CSO’s advocacy activities are minimal. • Tax laws favourable to CSOs: The Inland Revenue Ordinance contains provision of tax exemption for ‘non-profit-making’ or ‘voluntary’ org. • Tax benefits for philanthropy: Tax advantages for tax-exempt charity; Tax exemptions cover profits tax; stamp duty; estate duty; and business registration tax.

  8. 2.6. State-civil society relations • Score: 1.7 (Somewhat enabling) • Autonomy:Government interference is quite minimal on CSO registration and application to organize activities in public places. • Dialogue: There are limited dialogues between government and individual CSOs (e.g. advisory committees and consultative bodies). • Cooperation / support:Allocation of government resources for CSOs is usually done on a programme basis. Mainly falls in education and social welfare.

  9. 2.7. Private sector-civil society relations • Score: 1.0 (Somewhat disabling) • Private sector attitude: Business in general had a positive but indifferent view to CSOs. • Corporate social responsibility: The concept of corporate social responsibility was rather underdeveloped. • Corporate philanthropy: There are some involvements of business sectors into philanthropy, yet only a limited range of CSOs receives funding of this kind.

More Related