html5-img
1 / 29

America’s Crumbling Infrastructure

America’s Crumbling Infrastructure. Case Study 2 Jory Schwach Mari Hunter Jacob Christianson CE 5212 Prof. Levinson. Presentation Outline. Development Timeline Department of Transportation Bridge Inspections and Policy 35W Bridge Collapse Policy Implications Discussion.

bazyli
Télécharger la présentation

America’s Crumbling Infrastructure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. America’s Crumbling Infrastructure Case Study 2 Jory Schwach Mari Hunter Jacob Christianson CE 5212 Prof. Levinson

  2. Presentation Outline • Development Timeline • Department of Transportation • Bridge Inspections and Policy • 35W Bridge Collapse • Policy Implications • Discussion www.ci.maryville.tn.us

  3. Development Timeline • 1930’s • Transnational infrastructure to boost economy and connect the U.S. • 1938 • Federal-Aid Highway Act to study the network of roads across the nation • 1944 • Federal Highway Act led to development of 65,000 kilometers • 1956 • National System of Interstate and Defense Highways laid 41,000 miles for mobilizing military • 1966 • Department of Transportation established http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/ndhs.htm

  4. Mission of DOT dotlibrary.dot.gov “…to develop and coordinate policies that will provide an efficient and economical national transportation system, with due regard for need, the environment, and the national defense. It is the primary agency in the federal government with the responsibility for shaping and administering policies and programs to protect and enhance the safety, adequacy, and efficiency of the transportation system and services.” http://dotlibrary.dot.gov/Historian/history.htm

  5. National Bridge Inspection • Safety is ensured through hands-on inspections and bridge component (deck, superstructure, and sub-structure ) ratings all of which is maintained in the National Bridge Inventory (NBI) database. • Inspections • 4 year inspections • 2 year inspections • Annual inspections Over $4 billion is apportioned annually from the Federal government to State DOTs for bridge replacement, rehabilitation and preventative maintenance. www.freewebs.com http://www.dot.gov/affairs/factsheet080207.htm

  6. Historic Bridge Collapses - 1940: Tacoma Narrows Bridge, Washington www.britannica.com www.lib.washington.edu http://enr.construction.com/features/transportation/archives/070808b-2.asp

  7. Historic Bridge Collapses… 1967: Silver Bridge, Point Pleasant, W.Va www.wvculture.org http://enr.construction.com/features/transportation/archives/070808b-2.asp

  8. Historic Bridge Collapses… 1983: Mianus River Bridge, Connecticut www.accidents101.com www.tfhrc.gov www.insurancebroadcasting.com

  9. Historic Bridge Collapses… 1987: Schoharie Creek Bridge, New York water.usgs.gov

  10. Historic Bridge Collapses… 1989: Hatchie River Bridge, Tennessee www.tfhrc.gov www.fhwa.dot.gov www.tfhrc.gov

  11. Historic Bridge Collapses… 1989: October 17th San Francisco-Oakland Bay www.tfhrc.gov/

  12. Historic Bridge Collapses… 2006: Autoroute 19 Bridge, Laval, Quebec www.ctv.ca www.ctv.ca www.ctv.ca www.canada.com

  13. Construction Material Policy • “Advanced composites will be used to extend the service life of existing construction and to provide durability of new construstion” (www.tfhrc.gov) www.tfhrc.gov

  14. What’s Your Bridge Color? http://enr.construction.com/features/transportation/archives/070808b-2.asp

  15. Recent Work on the Bridge Work involved concrete and joint repair, lighting and guardrail installation Replacing the top 2 inches of the 9 inch roadway slab Completed the overlay work of the outside two lanes (both directions) Concrete was completely replaced in eight other spots for expansion joint replacement and full-depth repairs. The average size of a section that was entirely replaced was 26 feet by 3.5 feet To be completed September 30, 2007 for $9 million http://www.dot.state.mn.us/i35wbridge/pdfs/factsheet.pdf

  16. Video http://enr.construction.com/features/transportation/archives/070808d-1.asp Collapse of the 35W Bridge

  17. The Extent of the Collapse http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/02/us/02bridge.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

  18. The Aftermath of the Collapse http://enr.construction.com/features/transportation/archives/070808b-2.asp

  19. The Aftermath of the Collapse http://enr.construction.com/features/transportation/archives/070808b-2.asp

  20. The Aftermath • Thirteen people died and more than 100 people were injured • Initial estimates by Mn/DOT concluded that costs for the loss of 35W would total $400,000 per day http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/02/us/02bridge.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

  21. The Aftermath Continued… • Mn/DOT estimated a loss to Minnesota's economy to be $17 million in 2007 and $43 million in 2008 • It has been estimated that businesses have lost over $500,000 per day http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2007/08/02/us/20070802BRIDGE_index.html Brandt Williams. August 3, 2007. NTSB gets some early clues about the cause of the collapse. Minnesota Public Radio.

  22. RTMC Action and Policy • Issues caused by the bridge collapse • Congestion • Effects of Media and Shock • Post shock congestion shift • Resulting policy shifts • 280 Corridor • University to Central added lane • 94, 35W, 494, 210, and 169 shifts

  23. The Days Ahead • August 8th preliminary design teams had been established • August 21st a layout had been submitted to the city council • August 23rd the RFP had been released • September 14th technical proposals are received • September 18th financial proposals are received • September 19th project out to bid http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/TA/T2Center/Mgt.Systems/PavementTechnology/Fa04Conf%20L%5CNewPier2L.jpg

  24. Current Plans • Rebuilding Team: • Flatiron Constructors and Mason Construction • Expected to finish the bridge: • Within 437 days • Budget: $234 million • Technical score of 91.7 determined by: • Cost • Time • Technical capability www.skilledworkers.com

  25. Players Involved • Designers • Constructors • Inspectors • State and Federal Transportation Departments • City Planners • City Council Members • Policymakers

  26. Questions? Clipart

  27. Discussion Questions • What changes will happen because of the disaster? • Minor? • Major? • Removal of policy? • New policy? • Is it realistic to update all on American infrastructure? • Is it fair to value life monetarily? • Is $4 Million/person a realistic value on human-life? • Should the fiscal worth of life be a factor in guiding policy? 

  28. Discussion Continued… • “While history underscores inevitability, it also tells us how to break the inevitability of the life cycle.  We know that the instrument of choice for the intervention in the life cycle should be technology, for we have noted that technology is the major force for change."  Levinson (pg 57) What role should technology play in guiding policy?

More Related