1 / 29

Limit States and Design Parameters for Flexurally Dominated RC Columns

Limit States and Design Parameters for Flexurally Dominated RC Columns. Marc O. Eberhard Myles Parrish, Mike Berry University of Washington. Objective. P[DM|EDP].

bcalder
Télécharger la présentation

Limit States and Design Parameters for Flexurally Dominated RC Columns

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Limit States and Design Parameters for Flexurally Dominated RC Columns Marc O. Eberhard Myles Parrish, Mike Berry University of Washington

  2. Objective • P[DM|EDP] • For a specified deformation, what is the likelihood that a flexurally dominant reinforced column will suffer a particular level of damage?

  3. Research Approach • Identify Key Levels of Damage • Consequences • Identify Promising Deformation Parameters • Accuracy, Generality, Reproducibility • Assemble Database of Test Results • Correlate Damage with Deformation Parameters

  4. Onset of Spalling Onset of Bar Buckling Loss of Axial Load Typical Progression of Damage

  5. Demand Parameters Deformation Controlled Peak Deformation • Drift Ratio • Plastic Rotation • Displacement Ductility • Maximum Compressive Strain • Maximum Tensile Strain

  6. Database of Test Results

  7. Typical F Spiral-Reinforced Columns Rectangular Columns (149 tests) (204 tests) Properties Table Properties Table Test Results Test Results References References Columns with Splices RetrofittedColumns (7 tests) (11 tests) Properties Table Properties Table Test Results Test Results References References PEER Column Performance Database http://ce.washington.edu/~peera1

  8. Typical Test Configuration

  9. Typical Force-Displacement History 75 50 25 Applied Force (kips) 0 -25 -50 -75 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Displacement (in.) Nelson and Price, 2000 (P3)

  10. 75 SP BB 50 AX 25 Applied Force (kips) 0 -25 -50 -75 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Displacement (in.) Nelson and Price, 2000 (P3)

  11. Correlate Deformation Measures and Observed Damage:Onset of Spalling

  12. Drift Ratio at Onset of Spalling

  13. Drift Ratio at Onset of Spalling

  14. Concrete Strain at Onset of Spalling

  15. Concrete Strain at Onset of Spalling

  16. Why So Much Scatter?? • Observer Subjectivity • Discrete Levels of Imposed Deformation • Model Inaccuracy • complicated phenomena • effects of cycling • force-deformation response

  17. Kmeas/Kcalc 2.0 0 < L/D < 3 3 < L/D < 8 1.5 MEAN 1.0 0.5 0.0 HOGN KP MAND SAAT (P/f'cAg < 0.35)

  18. 60% 40% 20% 0% Kmeas/Kcalc COV HOGN KP MAND SAAT (P/f'cAg < 0.35)

  19. Correlate Deformation Measures and Observed Damage:Onset of Bar Buckling

  20. Drift Ratio at Onset Bar Buckling Rectangular Reinforced

  21. Drift Ratio at Onset Bar Buckling Rectangular Reinforced

  22. Drift Ratio at Onset Bar Buckling DRbuckle (%)= 2.5 (1-P/Agf’c)(1+8sfy/f’c) Rectangular Reinforced

  23. Strain at Onset of Bar Buckling

  24. buckle = 0.015+0.02sfy/f’c Strain at Onset of Bar Buckling

  25. Application

  26. Probability of Bar Buckling

  27. Conclusions • Database provides the information needed to systematically evaluate the accuracy of force-displacement and damage models. • For a given level of deformation, one can estimate the likelihood of reaching a particular level of damage.

  28. Questions?

More Related