1 / 9

CREZ Optimization Studies: A Possible Solution for Low-Voltage Parallel Paths

Explore a solution for managing contingency overloads on a critical power path to optimize transmission in the grid. Learn about possible strategies and case studies for optimal system performance.

bcordero
Télécharger la présentation

CREZ Optimization Studies: A Possible Solution for Low-Voltage Parallel Paths

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CREZ Optimization Studies:A Possible Solution for Low-Voltage Parallel Paths Cathey Carter, PE RPG CREZ meeting 12/14/2007

  2. The Problem West to North or West to Central transfer studies usually show contingency overloads on the 84 MVA 138kV path between South Abilene and Stephenville. • This line is very long and was state of the art many years ago. • It is one of the sources to the even smaller 69kV load-serving network for Eastland, Callahan, Brown, and Comanche counties.

  3. Possible Types of Solution to this Problem There are 4 ways to solve these low-voltage “local” problems: • Build new big lines to carry the power during the contingencies. • Re-build the existing small lines. • Install protection schemes or FACTS devices to limit the power flows on the small lines. • Rearrange the small lines so they do not form a parallel path to the big lines. This presentation presents an example of method #4.

  4. Existing Area

  5. Changes

  6. Resulting Radials

  7. Changes • 4 new 33 MVA 138-69kV autotransformers with LTCs (like those at Alamito Creek in Presidio). • One 13-mile extension of a radial 138kV line. • Two small 69kV capbanks, such as 3x2.4Mvar • Remove the Putnam phase-shifter and split the 138kV bus. • Open 15 sections of 69kV line, including 3 that are already modeled as normally open in the base case.

  8. Resulting Radial Loads and Lengths

  9. Questions and Challenges for Transmission Planners • Do you see a better solution for this area that would allow higher West to North transfers? • for not much higher cost • without decreasing reliability to the load customers • What is your favorite other low-voltage “local” contingency overload? • Where else would you apply this method? • Would you apply this to Saps-Menard-Gillespie? If yes, how? If no, why not? • Would you apply this to Brownwood-Lampasas? If yes, how? If no, why not?

More Related