1 / 30

Presentation Outline

The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributaries Presentation for _______ August 28, 2007. Presentation Outline. Background Network Design Pilot Phase Network Refinement Inventory and Gap Analysis. Why do we need the Network.

Télécharger la présentation

Presentation Outline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.


Presentation Transcript

  1. The National Water Quality Monitoring Network forU.S. Coastal Waters and their TributariesPresentation for _______August 28, 2007

  2. Presentation Outline • Background • Network Design • Pilot Phase • Network Refinement • Inventory and Gap Analysis

  3. Why do we need the Network • 22,000 water bodies are not attaining water quality standards • Widespread nutrient over-enrichment • Oxygen depletion • Loss of sea grass beds • Harmful algal blooms • Toxic contamination and pathogens • Closed beaches and shellfish beds • Fish and shellfish consumption advisories • Habitat alterations • Wetland loss • Invasive species

  4. Network Origins • U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy • Chapter 15, Creating a National Monitoring Network • U.S. Ocean Action Plan • Advancing our Understanding of the Oceans, Coasts, and Great Lakes • Create a National Water Quality Monitoring Network

  5. Advisory Committee on Water Information (ACWI)Charged with Network Design • Charge from Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) formally accepted in February, 2005 • ACWI delegated responsibility to National Water Quality Monitoring Council (NWQMC) • Report accepted by ACWI and presented to CEQ and NSTC in April, 2006 • CEQ and ACWI authorize Pilot Phase in January 2007

  6. Participant Affiliation 80 Participants in the Design Effort 2% Local Industry Federal 7% 40% State & Tribal 28% Academia 23%

  7. Network Presentations • Council on Environmental Quality • National Science and Technology Council: • SWAQ • Ocean Action Plan Oversight Groups: • Joint Subcommittee on Science and Technology (JSOST) • Subcommittee on Integrated Management of Ocean Resources (SIMOR) • Interagency Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Resource Management • Ocean Research and Resources Advisory Panel • Internal USGS, EPA, and NOAA groups

  8. Network Presentations • National Water Quality Monitoring Conference • May, 2006 • Approximately 900 attendees from Federal, Tribal, and State agencies, academia, private sector, volunteer monitoring community • Plenary presentation • 4 special sessions with open dialogue

  9. Multi-year Effort • Phase I - Network Design(FY 05 & 06) • Phase II - Develop and carry out Pilot Studies(FY 07 & 08) • Phase III - Demonstration Projects(FY 08& 09) • Phase IV – Implementation; fill gaps and provide necessary enhancements to existing monitoring programs (FY 10 and beyond)

  10. Design Features • Links inland, coastal, and ocean monitoring • Comparable and quality-controlled data across regions and resource compartments • Resolution at several scales • Includes targeted and probability based monitoring • Relevant to management issues (National and Regional) • Builds on existing programs • Includes data management and access

  11. Network will Address Management Questions • What is the condition of the Nation’s waters? • Where, how, and why are water quality conditions changing over time? • Are strategies to protect water quality working? • Are we meeting water quality goals and standards?

  12. Resource Compartments • Estuaries • Near-shore waters • Off-shore waters • Great Lakes • Coastal beaches • Wetlands • Flow and flux from • Streams • Ground water • Atmospheric deposition

  13. Constituent Categories • Physical: Flow magnitude and direction, physical habitat, sediments • Chemical: • Inorganic: Water-quality characteristics, major ions, nutrients, metals and metalloids • Organic: Bulk organics, volatile organic compounds, pesticides, halogenated hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, contaminants with new and emerging concerns • Biological: Diversity, toxicity

  14. What are the Benefits? • In-depth assessment of the water quality and health of the Nation’s coastal waters • Identify pollution loading patterns • Describe status • Detect change • Data sharing and comparability among agencies • Data made accessible • Quality assurance and quality control plans • Support water resources protection and restoration decisions • Minimize duplicative or ineffective monitoring; improve coordination

  15. Monitoring Estuaries

  16. Monitoring Near Shore

  17. Great Lakes Nearshore and Offshore Sites

  18. Proposed Riverine Stations

  19. Proposed Riverine Stations – Great Lakes

  20. Proposed Riverine Stations Alaska

  21. Ground Water • Focus on direct discharge to coastal waters • Local expertise used to determine significance of this source • Where significant, determine flow and loads

  22. Network Data Management • Design places major emphasis on storage and access • Built on ACWI’s Water Quality Data Elements for content, metadata • Assumes web services will be the data exchange mechanism

  23. The Network Will Not • Provide data on all water resources • Small rivers • Local aquifers • Lakes and Reservoirs • Replace State Clean Water Act Requirements • 305 (b) • 303 (d) • Replace Compliance Monitoring

  24. Relevance to Ocean Research Priorities Plan • ORPP Near-term Priority: Forecasting the response of coastal ecosystems to persistent forcing and extreme events • Network will provide: • Consistent, multidisciplinary and multi-media data • Observations of physical, chemical, and biological characteristics and processes • Data on flux of material from watersheds and airsheds • Links between environmental observations and public-health issues such as beach closures and fish and shellfish advisories

  25. Relevance to IOOS • Integrates watershed, marine, and estuarine elements • Provides information on land-based sources of contamination • Ensures comparable scales of data • Supports effective data management and dissemination • Supports development of Regional Coastal Ocean Observing Systems

  26. Efforts Underway in 2007 • Outreach • Agency staff to coordinate implementation • OSTP, NOAA, EPA, USGS • Network refinement workgroups • Further develop selected details of the Design • Nutrients, Contaminants, Wetlands, Beaches, Groundwater, Atmospheric Deposition, Biology, Data Management

  27. Efforts Underway in 2007Pilot Studies • Delaware Bay, San Francisco Bay, Lake Michigan • No new Federal funds provided to pilots • Conduct inventory of on-going monitoring • Gap Analysis: compare inventory to design • Identify management issues in pilot areas: • Habitat degradation, fresh-water flows, nutrient enrichment, contaminants, ground-water contribution, beach quality, effects of stressors on biology • Estimate cost of current and needed monitoring

  28. Results from Pilot Studies • Presentations at conferences organized by professional organizations • Reports for CEQ • Journals and other technical publications • National Water Quality Monitoring Conference • May 19-22, 2008 • Atlantic City, New Jersey

  29. Interagency Coordination and Responsibilities • All work coordinated by Interagency Working Group consisting of NOAA, USGS, and EPA with participation by OSTP • Federal, state, and local agencies and non-governmental partners (approximately 60 organizations) are contributing to the Pilot Phase • Lead Federal agency or agencies: • NOAA: near-shore and off-shore marine waters; estuaries and Great Lakes (joint with EPA) • EPA: wetlands and beaches; estuaries and Great Lakes (joint with NOAA) • USGS: streams and ground water • National Atmospheric Deposition Program-National Trends Network partners: atmospheric deposition • Data Management (EPA, NOAA, USGS, States, other non-Fed)

  30. More information • http://acwi.gov/monitoring/network/design

More Related