1 / 27

Correlation Functions: Getting Into Shape D.Brown, P.Danielewicz, S.Petriconi and S.Pratt

Correlation Functions: Getting Into Shape D.Brown, P.Danielewicz, S.Petriconi and S.Pratt. Probability 2 particles of same v are separated by r. Main Goal: Determine S. Measure C(q x ,q y ,q z ). Visualizing S. S P (r) = distribution of relative coordinates. Visualizing S.

beatriceboyer
Télécharger la présentation

Correlation Functions: Getting Into Shape D.Brown, P.Danielewicz, S.Petriconi and S.Pratt

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Correlation Functions:Getting Into Shape D.Brown, P.Danielewicz, S.Petriconi and S.Pratt Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  2. Probability 2 particles of same v are separated by r Main Goal: Determine S • Measure C(qx,qy,qz) Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  3. Visualizing S SP(r) = distribution of relative coordinates Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  4. Visualizing S Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  5. Lifetimes fromHBT Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  6. Frightening Results from RHIC • Hydro overpredicts: • Rside by 0% • Rbeam by ~ 50% • Rout by ~ 50% HYDRO+URQMD Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  7.    STAR      Simple Boltzmann Calculation (GROMIT)T. Humanic, AMPT, D. Molnar, S.P. • Underpredicts R ! • Underpredicts t ! • Slightly overpredicts Dt Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  8. Frightening results from RHIC • Suggests NO LATENT HEAT • Not so many extra degrees of freedom • Incompatible with Lattice EOS • Hard-EOS cascade does better (AMPT….) • Still has problems with Rside • Independent measurement would help Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  9. Can one determine Rout/Rlong/Rsidewith other classes of correlations? • Classical Coulomb IMF-IMF CorrelationsKim et al, PRC, (92) • Lednicky q+/q- correlations Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  10. Coulomb correlations Classically, determined by trajectories Q Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  11. Coulomb correlations Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  12. Approaches unity as 1/q2 Classical Coulomb correlations Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  13. pK+ correlations Rout=8 fm, Rside = Rbeam = 4 fm Classical approximation works well for Q > 50 MeV/c Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  14. Ratio ~ (Rout/Rside)2 Independent of Qinv for large Q pK+ correlations Rout=8 fm, Rside = Rbeam = 4 fm Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  15. Coulomb correlations • Sensitive to shape / lifetime !!! • Difficulty: Correlation in tails ~ 1% • Residual interactions can be subtracted away Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  16. For r outside interaction range , Strong interactions Everything determined by phase shifts Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  17. For r < , Density of States Constraint: Gives: Also determined by phase shifts Strong interactions Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  18. Positive for qside Negative for qout pp+ correlations Rout=8 fm, Rside = Rbeam = 4 fm Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  19. Reduces to 1-d problems! Danielewicz and Brown Angular Moments Defining, Using identities for Ylms, Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  20. L=0 • L=1, M=1 • L=2, M=0,2 • L=3, M=1,3 Angle-integrated shape Moments Lednicky offsets Shape (Rout/Rside, Rlong/Rside) Boomerang distortion Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  21. Blast Wave Moments • (z  -z) CL+M=even(q) = 0 • (y -y) Imag CL,M = 0 Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  22. Cartesian Harmonics Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  23. Cartesian Harmonics Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  24. Expansions… Advantage: More intuitive Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  25. Conclusions Strong and Coulomb provide 3-d resolving power • Resonances : f, K*, D, X* … • Small Qinv : pK, pp, pp, … • Moment analyses are POWERFUL • Reduces to 1-d problems for each L,M • Cartesian moments Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  26. CorAL, version 1.0aaaCorrelation Analysis LibraryDave Brown, Mike Heffner, Scott Pratt • Calculate |f(q,r)|2 • (pp, pp, pp, pn, nn, pK, pK, pL, LL, pS, …) • Correlations from models • Gaussian, Blast Wave, OSCAR files… • Fitting capability • Imaging capability • Integrated YLm and Cartesian moment analyses • Available Summer 2005 Scott Pratt Michigan State University

  27. Strong interactions One can integrate analytically, Scott Pratt Michigan State University

More Related