1 / 20

70-386 Behavioral Decision Making

70-386 Behavioral Decision Making. Lecture 1: Introduction. What is Behavioral Decision Research?. What is an optimal decision? Normative : Decision Analysis / Economics What do we need to understand in order to make good decisions? Quality of information.

belva
Télécharger la présentation

70-386 Behavioral Decision Making

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 70-386 Behavioral Decision Making Lecture 1: Introduction

  2. What is Behavioral Decision Research? • What is an optimal decision? • Normative: Decision Analysis / Economics • What do we need to understand in order to make good decisions? • Quality of information. • How do people actually make decisions? • Descriptive: Psychology • Limits on the quality of information or limits on the quality of decision making capabilities. • How can people be helped to make better decisions (by overcoming these biases)? • Prescriptive: Public Policy • Risk communication or limit choices

  3. Some things you might learn in this course • Why adding a product nobody buys may be beneficial to the seller • Why you can’t find a cab on a rainy day • Why people might donate more to save one person rather than 1000s • Why someone might be risk-adverse sometimes and risk-seeking sometimes – even when facing the same choice • A reason why too many people start businesses that fail.

  4. Course Overview

  5. Course Logistics • This is a mini course. • Fast pace: a lot of material per meeting • almost a chapter per class and classes meet 3x a week. • Attendance and Participation • Required. Participation is not just coming to class. • Phones / computers • If you’d rather check FB/twitter/instagram/etcthan pay attention, don’t come to class. • Office hours: • Will let you know by next time, but with an open door policy. • Outside of set office hours, set up an appointment.

  6. Course Grades Course grades will be based on: • Participation 10% • Midterm exam 20% • Three weeks from today! • Final exam 20% • Quizzes 30% (10% each, best 3 of 4) • First quiz next Sunday • Group paper presentation: 20%

  7. Course Schedule • See the last page of the syllabus for a tentative schedule • Readings after week two aren’t list; they will be. • There is a natural progression of material in Economics/Decision Analysis. Less so in BDR • BDR is a much younger field. A coherent theory for everything we’ll discuss still isn’t exactly worked out. • Doesn’t mean that it’s wrong – just that we’re still trying to figure things out.

  8. Teaching this course. First time I’ve taught this course • There will be changes throughout the course. Usually it takes about 3 times before I think a course is about right. Sorry, but you have to start somewhere. • But we’ll work together. The material is interesting. And the course is meant to give you an overview of a field you probably haven’t seen. I love my job. I want to teach the best that I can. But to do that I need to get to know you • Stop by my office this week for 5-10 min, even if you’ve had me before.

  9. Recommended books • We’ll draw on these later in the course, but if you find the material interesting, definitely check out (in the library): • Nudge, by Thaler and Sunstein • Thinking Fast and Slow, by Kahneman • Predictably Irrational, by Ariely

  10. Decision Making Review

  11. What is a decision?

  12. Decision Evaluation • I bought a lottery ticket and won $10,000 • Was buying the ticket a good decision? Why or Why Not? • Ex post or ex ante? • How do you measure the quality of a decision? • Outcome Quality • Decision Process Quality

  13. Optimal decision analysis • Define the problem • Do NOT define in terms of a proposed sol’nor diagnosed symptoms. • Identify the criteria • What’s the objective? Is there more than one? • Weigh the criteria • What matters? Some things matter more than others • Generate alternatives • What are the courses of action available? • Rate each alternative on each criterion • What are the payoffs? • Is there any uncertainty? Do you need to forecast future events? • Compute the optimal decision • What is your utility function? What is your tolerance for risk?

  14. Evaluating the Process • The soundness of the decision-making process determines the quality of the decision, not the attractiveness of the outcome. • Making the optimal decision is tough. • Satisficing: making a choice that is “good enough” rather than optimizing to find the ideal choice (Herb Simon 1956). Example: choosing a college or university. • Heuristics: Decision aids or “shortcuts” that we rely on to make complex decisions manageable. • What might affect our decision-making processes • Reliance on heuristics often leads to biases --- deviations from normatively sound perceptions and judgments. • Optical Illusions as an Analogy: The image we see may lead us to a mistaken or biased representation of reality

  15. How many of the discs are spinning?

  16. Cognitive Illusions • Cognitive illusions are similar to optical illusions in that they, too, can cause us to misperceive the world • Biases emerge in: • Drawing comparisons • Evaluating probabilities • Reasoning from the past • Extrapolating from limited data • Assessing our own values • .....

  17. Difference are not always mistakes • Two equally valid interpretations of the same data. • Can we justify differences? • Subjective probability: different interpretations of same set of evidence • (Leonard Savage 1954) • Personally value outcomes differently • Risk Judgments (e.g. cars vs. airplanes) • Value Elicitation (e.g. Fischhoff 1991) • Normative and descriptive analysis are interdependent!

  18. Results from Psychology vs Economics Economics : Homo economicus Psychology Irrational Decision Makers (“humans”) • Stable, complete and transitive preferences • Utility maximizers • `Perfect’ foresight Normative • Unstable preferences • Context matters • Satisficing + systematic “errors” Descriptive

  19. Questionnaire

  20. Next time – by 26/8/14 • Read Chapter 2 in JMDM • Meet with me this week

More Related