1 / 12

The RMP Mercury Strategy

The RMP Mercury Strategy. Jay A. Davis San Francisco Estuary Institute Presented at: The RMP Mercury Coordination Meeting Feb 2008. Origins. SF Bay pollutant enemy #1 Profusion of mercury proposals Tom Mumley’s idea RMP Mercury Group Stakeholder planning group

bena
Télécharger la présentation

The RMP Mercury Strategy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The RMP Mercury Strategy Jay A. Davis San Francisco Estuary Institute Presented at: The RMP Mercury Coordination Meeting Feb 2008

  2. Origins • SF Bay pollutant enemy #1 • Profusion of mercury proposals • Tom Mumley’s idea • RMP Mercury Group • Stakeholder planning group • Key input from Regional Board

  3. RMP Mercury Strategy • Concise, living document • Overarching goal to support water quality management decisions • Articulates prioritized information needs of managers • Focus on methylmercury • Premise: possible to identify key fractions and processes to achieve a more rapid solution • Augments existing RMP Status and Trends monitoring

  4. Management Questions for Mercury • Where is mercury entering the food web? • Which processes, sources, and pathways contribute disproportionately to food web accumulation? • What are the best opportunities for management intervention for the most important pollutant sources, pathways, and processes? • What effects can be expected from management actions? • Will total mercury reductions result in reduced food web accumulation?

  5. Q1: Patterns in Uptake • Major focus for next 3 years • Spatial and temporal • RMP Small fish • RMP S&T: sport fish, bird eggs, water, sediment • Other studies • FMP • SBMP • USGS

  6. Q2: High Leverage Pathways • Ideally follows Q1 • Some work now, greater focus after a few years • RFP • Two potentially very valuable but somewhat risky studies • Blum isotopes • Hintelman DGTs • Other studies • Sac Regional • WERF….

  7. Q3: Opportunities for Intervention • Ideally follows Q2 • RMP focus on internal sources • Other programs on external sources • Lester’s Prop 13 Study

  8. Q4: Effects of Management Actions • Management actions including remediation, restoration, etc. • Models – continual development • MeHg mass budget a start • Monitoring • Regional monitoring • Local monitoring as actions are taken

  9. Q5: Effect of Total Mercury Reductions • Not part of the 1-4 sequence • No specific studies currently planned

  10. RMP Plan for Mercury Studies

  11. Benefits • Clear direction for obtaining needed information • More effective use of RMP funds • Framework for evaluating and communicating progress

  12. Filling the Gaps • Are there better ways of answering our questions? • Are any important elements missing? • Systematic monitoring of restoration? • Can we be coordinating existing elements better?

More Related