1 / 37

Institutional Performance Program 2019 Regional Rules Seminar

Institutional Performance Program 2019 Regional Rules Seminar. PLEASE TRY TO SIT AT A TABLE WHICH DESIGNATES YOUR INSTITUTION’S DIVISION. Agenda. Introduction and resources : Updates to IPP data management system. Demonstration of IPP. Admissions case study.

bernad
Télécharger la présentation

Institutional Performance Program 2019 Regional Rules Seminar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Institutional Performance Program2019 Regional Rules Seminar PLEASE TRY TO SIT AT A TABLE WHICH DESIGNATES YOUR INSTITUTION’S DIVISION

  2. Agenda Introduction and resources: • Updates to IPP data management system. • Demonstration of IPP. • Admissions case study. • Peer group development case study. • How to build a report for department/institutional leadership. • Key takeaways and questions.

  3. IPP Resources

  4. Updates • Health and safety data. • Division II Proposal 2019-5. • Division III Proposal 2019-4. • Ability to designate/restrict access to data. • Recent updates to IPP.

  5. Case Study No. 1 Academic Admissions

  6. Case Study No. 1: Facts • Titan University is a Division I FBS institution. • Titan University football staff is recruiting Ronnie “Sunshine” Bass. • Rising senior at T.C. Williams High School. • Holds state records for touchdown and passing yards. • Is the defending state 100-meter champion. • Ronnie’s academic record is as follows: • 2.30 core-course GPA. • 960 SAT (seven attempts).

  7. Case Study No. 1 Questions: • Is Ronnie Bass admissible? • Can Ronnie be academically successful at Titan University? • What do you need to know? • How can IPP help you?

  8. Case Study No. 1 How Can IPP Assist? • Academic outcome data indicators. • Division I Academic Progress Rate. • Eligibility and retention. • Graduation rates. • Academic initial-eligibility. • Core-course GPA. • Scholastic Assessment Test score.

  9. Case Study No. 1: How Can IPP Assist?

  10. Case Study No. 1

  11. Case Study No. 1 Single-Year APR – Football

  12. Case Study No. 1 Eligibility Rate – Football

  13. Case Study No. 1 Retention Rate – Football

  14. Case Study No. 1 Discussion: What else do you need or want to know? • Academic support services available for at-risk SAs? • Inside and outside of athletics? • Number of at-risk SAs on current team? • Number of at-risk SAs currently enrolled? • Current (special) admission standards for your institution? • How far is Ronnie away from meeting standards?

  15. Case Study No. 2 Peer Group Formation Fiscal Management/Peer Group Comparisons

  16. Case Study No. 2: Facts • D2U is a Division II public institution. • Jill is D2U’s head women’s soccer coach. • Hired in November 2015. • D2U’s record in Jill’s first three seasons: 2016: 2-13-3 2017: 5-9-4 2018: 4-10-3

  17. Case Study No. 2: Facts, cont. • In December 2018, Jill asserts her program is underfunded. • Scholarships. • Coach’s salary. • Recruiting budget. • Jill wants to field a championship team. • Does she have the necessary funding?

  18. Case Study No. 2: Peer Group Selection • Division II Women’s Soccer Teams. • Division II Women’s Soccer Teams + Public Institutions. • 2018 Division II Women’s Soccer NCAA Championship Field.

  19. Case Study No. 2: Peer Group Selection STEP 2: Choose Women’s Soccer and Public Step 3: Type School Name(s) Step 1: Choose Division II

  20. Case Study No. 2 1 3 2

  21. Case Study No. 2Total Scholarship Dollars – Women’s Soccer

  22. Case Study No. 2 Equivalencies – Women’s Soccer

  23. Case Study No. 2Head Coach Compensation – Women’s Soccer

  24. Case Study No. 2Assistant Coach Compensation

  25. Case Study No. 2Recruiting Expenses

  26. Case Study No. 2 Discussion: • Is head coach Jill’s assertion correct? • Is her program underfunded? • What other considerations are relevant for your meeting?

  27. Case Study No. 3 IPP Reporting

  28. Case Study No. 3IPP Reporting

  29. Case Study No. 3IPP Reporting Discussion: • Please review the case study at your tables. • What is most important to your president/chancellor? • What is most important to convey your priorities? • What can highlight/detract from your presentation? • How can IPP help?

  30. Case Study No. 3IPP Reporting Report for President/Chancellor: • Athletics department expenses and revenues. • Percentage of institutional budget. • Academic outcome data. • Leadership demographics.

  31. Case Study No. 3IPP Reporting Additional Peer Groups: • Potential conference realignment. • In-state competitors. • National competitors. • Football.

  32. Case Study No. 3Financial Data Indicators

  33. Case Study No. 3Academic Data Indicators

  34. Case Study No. 3Demographic Data Indicators

  35. Questions? Jennifer Samble (jsamble@ncaa.org) Steve Clar (sclar@ncaa.org) ipp@ncaa.org

  36. We Want Your Feedback Your input is important. Rate this session using the survey on the Regional Rules Seminar app.

More Related