1 / 18

Family Groups in Living History Museums

Family Groups in Living History Museums. Johanna Bromberg Craig EDLF 844 May 5, 2008. Caveats. Interpreters means museum staff members who dress in costume and work as historical interpreters (unless otherwise noted) Part of a larger on-going inquiry for my pilot study. Background.

bess
Télécharger la présentation

Family Groups in Living History Museums

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Family Groups in Living History Museums Johanna Bromberg Craig EDLF 844 May 5, 2008

  2. Caveats • Interpreters means museum staff members who dress in costume and work as historical interpreters (unless otherwise noted) • Part of a larger on-going inquiry for my pilot study

  3. Background • Family groups constitute the majority of museum visitors • Family groups can be seen as a community of practice • Living history museum visits are incredibly open-ended • Social construction of knowledge

  4. Guiding Questions • What is the nature of learning embedded in the interactions between family groups and historical interpreters in a living history museum? • What are the family groups’ beliefs about learning? What does it mean to them? • What are the historical interpreters’ beliefs about learning? What does it mean to them?

  5. Methodology • Interpretive paradigm • Erickson’s model of analytic induction as research strategy

  6. Site and Sample • Medium-sized outdoor living history museum in Central VA • 3 family groups - moms and dads and 2 or 3 kids, ranging from 8-16 years of age • 4 interpreters

  7. Approaching Random Strangers… • Families were surprisingly agreeable and accommodating • Lesson learned - ask the whole group, not just one person

  8. Data Gathering • Observation of the entire visit • Pre/post “family meaning maps” and interviews • Observations of interpreters with different visitors • Interviews with interpreters

  9. Validity • Validity according to Erickson (1986) - immediate and local meaning of actions, as defined by the actors’ point of view • Made sure to have enough evidence in time and kind • Vignettes, Quotes, Graphics… • Only assertions with a preponderance of evidence (and accounting for confirming and disconfirming evidence) • Researcher as Instrument

  10. 3 Assertions • Interactions • Process of Visit • Interpreter Engagement Strategies

  11. Assertion #1 • parent/child - personal and cultural • parent/interpreter - social and status • interpreter/child - material “stuff”

  12. Assertion #2 • Family groups interact differently throughout the process of the museum visit. This can be seen in the encounters early on in the visit as compared to encounters later in the trip. This is influenced by the efforts of each successive interpreter to make comparisons between farms and connect the farms thematically.

  13. An example • “Jason tentatively approaches the closed door that is the entrance to the main house, and knocks quietly on the door. Alex looks up at him, rolls her eyes a bit and says in an exasperated tone, that he should “just open it!” Jason begins to open the door, and once it is partially open Alex steps in front of him and flings herself against the door, enthusiastically anticipating what she will see inside.” (Fieldnotes, 3.23.08)

  14. Assertion #3 • Interpreters’ interactions with family groups are influenced by their belief about their own learning and their beliefs about visitor learning, which shape their strategies for visitor engagement.

  15. Caleb’s Own Learning • “Because as I learned as an actor, when you can actually put work and education and information into your body and into your brain by physically doing the work, or physically doing an activity, you remember it a lot easier, and it also um almost becomes second nature because it’s something that you do on a regular basis” (Interview, 3.27.08)

  16. Caleb: Visitor Learning • “We are definitely a hands-on type learning experience… when first starting to work here I realized this is not the velvet ropes style of museum where you stand back and kind of look at an artifact and don’t really get a chance to touch it, feel it or experience it… uh, this is the place where you get to actually feel, and touch, and experience and work with just even the most simple of things, like just putting a bucket in a well, or uh using some of the flax tools, being a little bit more complex tools than that.” (Interview, 3.27.08)

  17. Caleb and the Visitors • Forge only place in the museum that is not hands on • Caleb made it so - hammers and bellows

  18. Implications • How to get parents and children involved more collaboratively, thinking about more complex issues? • Rethinking orientation video… new process?

More Related