1 / 21

IBL project for DT Science-Techno Tea

IBL project for DT Science-Techno Tea. R. Vuillermet PH/ADO/PO. Overview. Introduction to IBL project IBL project structure IBL challenges Focus on WG3 WG3 Partners Scale one mock-up Scenario and tools for beam pipe extraction and IBL insertion. Introduction to IBL project.

bethany-watts
Télécharger la présentation

IBL project for DT Science-Techno Tea

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IBL projectforDT Science-Techno Tea R. Vuillermet PH/ADO/PO R.Vuillermet

  2. Overview • Introduction to IBL project • IBL project structure • IBL challenges • Focus on WG3 • WG3 Partners • Scale one mock-up • Scenario and tools for beam pipe extraction and IBL insertion R.Vuillermet

  3. Introduction to IBL project • IBL : Insertable B-layer • B Like “Beauty” • An additional layer of Pixel will be inserted into the Pixel detector of ATLAS • Why an additional layer ? • To be closer to interaction point and closer to the decay of the Beauty particle • To gain into track reconstruction by having a 4th point • To compensate the ineluctable degradation of the current B-Layer • To implement the most recent silicon and chips technology R.Vuillermet

  4. Increased luminosity requires • Higher hit-rate capability • Higher segmentation • Higher radiation hardness • Lighter detectors • Radiation hardness improvement compared to now on pixel sensors • IBL approx. factor 5 • Phase-2 approx. factor 10-30 R.Vuillermet

  5. IBL project structure • Project leader : Giovanni Darbo (Genova, IT) • Technical coordinator : Heinz Perneger (PH/ADE) • Working group leaders : • WG1 : Module • Fabian Huegging Bonn & M. Garcia-Sciveres LBL • WG2 : Stave and Flex • E. Vigeolas CPPM & O. Rohne Oslo • WG3 : Integration and Installation, • R. Vuillermet CERN & F. Cadoux UniGe • WG4 : Off detector • T. Flick Wuppertal& S. Debieux UniGe • Each working group meet with there teams every 2 weeks • All the working group leaders with PL and TC meet once a month during a IBL Management Board R.Vuillermet

  6. IBL Challenges • WG1 : New technology for the module : • Planar and 3D (first time tested in experiment) • Those modules are qualify with x5 more irradiation dose (5xE15 neutoneq/cm2) than the current B-layer • New Front End Chip • x6 bigger in the surface than current Pixel (26888 /2880 channels) • Qualified for 250Mrad instead of 50Mrad, • Increase the number of included transistor 87Milliong (3.5M with current B-layer) ~2 cm FE-I4 R/O Chip 27 k Pixels 87 M transistors ~2 cm R.Vuillermet

  7. WG2 : • Lighter structure, use of carbon foam • New cooling technology for the Pixel with Co2 instead of C3F8 (cooling pipe diameter 1.5mm) • New Stave’s flex with multilayers • 2 aluminium layers sand 4 layers copper • Connection across the thickness with via (new technology) K9 Foam bloc K13C /RS3 parylencoated face plate Peek end blocs K13C/RS3 Omega Stiffener Flex Bus ID 1.5mm Ti boiling pipe R.Vuillermet

  8. Stave Handling frame • WG3 : • Develop the scenario for Beam pipe extraction and IBL insertion, whereas this operation was never foreseen during the design of the current pixel detector. • Integration of the stave in very limited space • Tight integration of all modules services in a narrow space Beam Pipe R.Vuillermet

  9. WG4 : • New electronic for read out (ROD read out driver) x4 more channel per board • Have to transmit signal of 1.60Mbytes on long cable (6-8m) • Guaranty low V drop in the power lines • Define and develop services with their connections Optobox concept for Pixel readout upgrade and IBL R.Vuillermet

  10. WG3 : Integration & InstallationPartners • Several partners are collaborating in these tasks : • UniGe (Geneva) for the integration and loading tool • Loading of the stave on the beam pipe (operation to be done in SR1) • LAPP (Annecy)for the service organisation • Wrapping of the services to be able to insert IBL with their services into the Inner Support Tube (Ø86mm) • Integration and routing of services on the front face of the Inner Detector R.Vuillermet

  11. LPSC (Grenoble) for the extraction/insertion supports • Brandeis (Boston) for the LGT development • Seattle for the IST fabrication • LAL (Paris) for the design of : • sealing ring (feed through and electrical shielding) • IST support R.Vuillermet

  12. At CERN : • Design and integration of the IBL Package • Christophe Bault (PH/DT) for the design and integration of PP0 area • Francois-Xavier Nuiry (PH/DT) for the design and integration of the flex + thermal mock-up • Denis Diyakov (PH/ADO) for the Services integration up to USA 15 • Erik Richards (PH/ADO) for the services integration on the Calorimeter end plate and optobox design\ • Sebastien Michal (PH/ADO - UniGe) for the CAD management, PP1 integration, integration with Pixel and DBM • Mock-up assembly and tests • Marco Ciapetti (PH/ADO) for the integration of the scale one mock up and its associated tooling. • Louis Rose-Dulcina and Francisco Limia-Conde (PH/ADO)for the assembly and tests of tooling in building 180. • Safety aspect for activation of the working area • Olga Beltramello (PH/ADO) • Mechanical simulation • Dimitar Mladenov (PH/ADO) Part time job R.Vuillermet

  13. Mock-up of the inner detector Scale one mock-up (b180) Support tools for insertion/extraction Supporting structure on side C with Mini vans Supporting structure on side A with bridge scaffolding R. Vuillermet

  14. Scenario and tooling for beam pipe extraction and IBL insertion • The removing the beam pipe in situ, is an operation that was never imagined during the design of the Pixel supporting structure. • This operation is delicate for several reasons : • The beam pipe is a long object (7.4m) • The beam pipe deforms under its own weight of about 40mm, when place on 2 supports at its extremities • The pixel modules are radially located at 8 mm from the beam pipe and are extremely fragile • The wire system that support the beam pipe is not directly accessible as it is located at 3m from any hands access • The working space to insert tools are rather small • The possibility to control visually the removing operation is limited or impossible ... • Despite what is looking like “impossible mission” we have imagined tools and procedures to perform this extraction operation • And have developed a scale one mock-up of the inner detector and its environment to test, improve, practise the tools and procedures R. Vuillermet

  15. Remove the beam pipeConcept and tools PP1 support • Beam pipe support : A-side C-side • Concept : • As their is not space out of the beam pipe to access and support it we have explored what can be done from the inside the beam pipe • The tools • The Long Guiding Tube (LGT) • The LGT was imagined and design such that it can take the load of the beam pipe and can control actively its central deflection (using muon alignment system connected to a tension mechanism). Once on the LGT, the beam pipe can slide out of the inner detector. • The collar removing tools • The collar removing tool is disassembling the collar and collecting the wires such that the beam pipe can slide through the Pixel B-Layer. • Reception tooling • For support, and handling of the different items that need to be transfer with the surface. Central wire support R. Vuillermet

  16. Remove the beam pipeConcept and tools • The beam pipe flange on A-side is too close to the B-layer envelope . The flange need to be cut on the aluminum section • The LGT is inserted inside the Beam Pipe and supported at both sides. • The support collar at PP0 A and C-side are disassembled and extracted with wires at PP1. • Beam pipe is extracted from the C-side and it pulls the wire at PP1 • New cable supports are inserted inside Pixel volume at PP0. • A support carbon tube (Inner Support Tube IST) is pushed inside the Pixel volume along the LGT. C-side A-side R. Vuillermet

  17. The IST is supported in 2 points at PP0 by the wire system and on PP1 walls on side C and A at the level of the Pixel cruciform. • The LGT with a space frame are moved out from the IST . The new beam pipe with the IBL Package are inserted from C-side. A-side C-side R. Vuillermet

  18. Removing the beam pipeThe Long Guiding Tube (Brandeis) • An aluminium tube equipped with an optical system able to measure its deflection in the several points and equipped with a mechanical system applying a torque at both extremities pilot by a regulation soft to compensate the middle deflection. Horizontal displacement Vertical displacement LGT with dummy beam pipe during calibration process R. Vuillermet

  19. LGT “OFF” Deflecting under its own weight LGT “ON” Self compensating its natural deflecting R. Vuillermet

  20. Remove the collar supporting the beam pipe Screw driver tool Bolt Catching tool Collar catching tool Extraction test with the first prototype tool New tool R. Vuillermet

  21. IBL : • A small detector (compare to ATLAS) with many challenges in all domains ... R.Vuillermet

More Related