1 / 12

The Footprint of the Oil and Gas Industry in the Russian Landscape Moscow, 27 April 2006

The Footprint of the Oil and Gas Industry in the Russian Landscape Moscow, 27 April 2006. The World Resources Institute. The World Resources Institute is an environmental think tank that goes beyond research to create practical ways to protect the Earth and improve people’s lives.

bevis-solomon
Télécharger la présentation

The Footprint of the Oil and Gas Industry in the Russian Landscape Moscow, 27 April 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Footprint of the Oil and Gas Industry in the Russian Landscape Moscow, 27 April 2006

  2. The World Resources Institute • The World Resources Institute is an environmental think tank that goes beyond research to create practical ways to protect the Earth and improve people’s lives.

  3. The World Resources Institute • Founded in 1982 in Washington, DC, USA • Non-governmental, non-profit, non-advocacy • Approx. 130 staff • Broad scope – 4 major programs • People and ecosystems • Institutions and governance • Sustainable business • Climate • Global reach through partnerships • Works with many sectors: government, business, NGO, research, etc.

  4. The Footprint Project • Assess the on-shore footprint of the oil and gas industry, • For all of Russia, • Using public information. • Develop a method, and • Produce an accurate and accepted result, • In 3 years, • With an independent Russian project team.

  5. Conditions of cooperation with TNK-BP • Resources from TNK-BP – money, access, information • Independence – no control of the result by TNK-BP • No advertising of the project without mutual agreement • No quid pro quo – participating groups have no obligation of loyalty to TNK-BP • Constructive collaboration – regular informal contact, try to be useful

  6. Key concept 1 - Footprint • In principle: • The negative environmental and social impact of oil and gas industry on the Russian land base • Including • All phases from geological survey to site restoration • On-site and off-site impacts • Excluding • Effects on oceans and global climate • Post-production effects (trunk pipelines, etc) • Sites of future development (greenfield sites)

  7. Key concept 2 – Remote information • Information from remote sources • Must be public • Must not require any field work in areas with restricted access • Must not require any special permission

  8. Remote information - Examples • Statistical data • State environmental monitoring reports • Scientific publications • Media publications • Information from local people and NGOs • Open general maps, thematic maps • Forest and land survey materials • Satellite imagery

  9. Problem • How do we balance: • What is right, and • What is possible? • In other words: • The actual footprint, and • What can be practically detected

  10. C D A B Landscape fragmentation Fires Road construction Air pollution Soil pollution Water pollution Logging - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Social corrosion Informationin publicdomain Information available through satellite imagery Familiar ways to analyze satellite imagery New ways to analyze satellite imagery Media reports Official stats - Total footprint A • Footprint assessed with public Information B - Footprint assessed with different kinds of public info C - Additional assessment based on clever use of public info D Key concept 3 – Assessed footprint

  11. Questions • Given the scope of the project • Is the footprint well defined? • Is remote information well used? • Will the result be accepted? • Are we on the right track? • What else should we do?

  12. Спасибо!

More Related