1 / 29

International Workshop on Research Assessment in CERIF

Explore research assessment systems in the UK, Germany, and Finland, mapping data to CERIF and addressing key questions on process, purpose, information needed, and implementation at universities. Learn about RAE, REF, German Research Rating, and Finnish assessment methods.

bevis
Télécharger la présentation

International Workshop on Research Assessment in CERIF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Workshop on research assessment in CERIF Stephen Grace, Brigitte Jörg, Aija Kaitera, Maximilian Stempfhuber

  2. Workshop on research assessment in CERIF • Three ten-minute presentations on systems in UK, Germany and Finland • One hour discussion on common data elements across different national boundaries • Map them to CERIF • Submit to CERIF Task Force

  3. Questions to ask • WHO does it? Is it local or national? • WHEN and WHERE it takes place? One-off or regular activity? • WHY is it done? What is the purpose of the exercise – to allocate money, to improve performance, to encourage co-operation etc.? • WHAT information/data is needed? The types of information needed? • HOW universities handle the process? Systems, staff involved?

  4. Assessment in the UK Stephen Grace • Research Assessment Exercise (RAE): • WHO does it? Funding Councils • WHEN? Every six years • WHERE? From University to Funding Council • WHY? To identify Research Excellence in order to allocate funding • WHAT? Information on Researchers, their Outputs, Sources of Funding, Studentships, Measures of Esteem • HOW? Gather data from internal systems to submit to the Funding Council using XML Schema or online form filling

  5. Research Excellence Framework (REF) • Research Excellence Framework (REF) aims to be simpler to administer than RAE • Introduces Impact element (25% of marks) to cover benefits to economy, society, culture, public policy and services, health, environment, international development and the quality of life • Still working out what will be asked, and the form of submissions in the area of Impact

  6. Assessment in Germany Maximilian Stempfhuber • Research Rating: • WHO does it? German Research Council (Wissenschaftsrat) • WHEN? Since 2007, pilot phase for selected disciplines • WHERE? At Universities and research centres jointly funded by federal ministries and states • WHY?To rate and compare research performance • WHAT? Information on Research Groups: Quality, Impact / Effectiveness, Promotion of young Scientists, Transfer • HOW? Questionnaire for all information except publications; self reporting system for publications or use of commercial reference database (depending on discipline)

  7. Assessment in Germany Maximilian Stempfhuber • Rating (not ranking) • Pilot studies in Chemistry and Sociology (2007/08), different modes of data collection • Current: Electrical engineering & Information technology, planned: Humanities • Currently not used for performance based funding • In parallel: • University Excellence Initiative (Wissenschaftsrat & DFG) • CHE University Ranking (CHE & Die Zeit)

  8. 1: Quality of Research • Citations • Per selected publication • Per selected publication, normalized to journal • No. of reviewed publications • Publications • List of publications per publication type • 5 most important publications • List of patents

  9. 1: Quality of Research (cont.) • Total of external funding spent • Public funding • Commercial funding • List of research awards etc. • Management of national / international research networks

  10. 2. Impact / Effectiveness • Publications: No. of reviewed publications • Patents: No. of patents, total of earned licensing fees • Total of external funding spent • Public funding • Commercial funding • Percentage of external funded staff • Management of national / international research networks

  11. 2. Impact / Effectiveness (cont.) • Citations of selected (important) publications • Citations of selected (important) publications normalized to journal • No. of funded visiting researchers • No. of distinguished positions in external scientific organizations, learned societies etc. • Chair / co-chair at conferences • Ratio: reviewed publications / scientific staff

  12. 3. Promotion of young scientists • PhDs • No. of successful PhD studies / female applicants • List of PhD (structured) programmes • No. of advised and finished PhD thesis • No. of persons receiving grants • List of first-time professorships • No. of habilitations / female applicants

  13. 4. Knowledge / Technology Transfer • No. of patents, total of earned license fees • Total of external funding from industry • List of spin-offs • Involvement in standardizing bodies • List of positions relevant for transfer • List of activities in knowledge transfer

  14. Assessment in FinlandAija Kaitera • WHO does it? Academy of Finland / Ministry of Education • WHEN? Every three years • WHERE? from individual commitees, the Universities • WHY? The state and quality of scientific research in Finland Funding Allocation • WHAT? publications, international mobility, develop research training research careers, interaction with society • HOW? bibliometrics, targeted questionnaires; evaluation of disciplines and research fields (more continuous)

  15. Assessment in FinlandAija Kaitera

  16. Assessment Activities in FinlandAija Kaitera • National level research system evaluations by Academy of Finland • The state and quality of scientific research in Finland (every 3 years; bibliometrics, targeted questionnaires) • Evaluation of disciplines and research fields (more continuous) • Organisation Level by Scientific Advisory Boards • Intl evaluation of organisation’s activities (every 3 or 6 years) • Operational level by organisation’s internal committees • Allocation of basic funding (from ministry to universities every three years; universities to faculties every year) • Allocation of quality funding • Evaluation of grant applications (continuous) • Evaluation of research programmes (continuous)

  17. Assessment Activities in FinlandAija KaiteraData Collecting Processes • From researcher to funding bodies • From researcher to university • From university to funding body • From university to ministry

  18. National annual reporting Questionnaires Grant reports SABs Assessment Activities in FinlandAija KaiteraMethods • New national data warehouse (2013?) • Research: Project, Grant decision, Person, Person’s education, University or Polytechnic, Address, Research group, Space, Publications, Innovations, Other research activities, Results • Also person, employment, academic data • New national publication database (2012?) • New national publication classification • Open access is included in national reporting (is/is not), separate service for full texts • Will include publication quality assessment “Norwegian model

  19. Assessment Activities in FinlandAija KaiteraPublication classification in Finland 2010->

  20. cfOrgUnit-CORE cfPers-CORE cfFundProg-2ND cfPersName-ADD cfOrgUnitId_OrgUnit-LINK cfPersName-OrgUnit-LINK cfOrgUnit_ResPubl-LINK cfPers_ResPubl-LINK cfResPubl_Class-LINK cfOrgUnit_FundProg-LINK cfResPublBiblNote-LANG cfResPublAbstr-LANG cfClassTerm-LANG cfOrgUnitResAct-LANG cfOrgUnitName-LANG cfPers_Pers-LINK cfPers_ExpSkills-LINK cfExpSkillsDescr-LANG cfResPubl-RES CERIF4REF schema – 3:Tables generated in CERIF

  21. Expert Group on Assessment of University-Based Research • EU, 2010 • http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/assessing-europe-university-based-research_en.pdf

  22. Multidimensional research assessment matrix

  23. Purpose of research assessment • Allocate resources • Drive research mission differentiation • Increase regional/ community engagement • Improve research performance • Assess VFM or cost-benefits of research • Encourage international co-operation • Increase multidisciplinary research

  24. Next steps • Report back to this conference • Report to CERIF Task Group • etc

  25. Thank you • Stephen Grace • Centre for e-Research • King’s College London • http://www.kcl.ac.uk/iss/cerch/ • stephen.grace@kcl.ac.uk

  26. Workshop Results • Many countries deal with the same problems • Different states of progress to implementation • Currently, most go for Output Measurement rather than Impact (because measurable)

  27. Workshop Results • CERIF: Quite powerful representation means with respect to Assessment Requirements (-> REF) • Best Way utilize CERIF is Best Practice • - Qualitative / Quantitative Data Requirements (across European activities)

  28. Workshop Results • Formalization and Measurement is necessary in order to do Analysis • also the Measurement of soft qualities has to be formalized for Measurement • CRISs the place to store even soft facts

  29. Workshop Results • CRISs the place to • document / archive soft facts (impacts) • for Reporting / Strategy / Planning …

More Related