1 / 22

From Export Promotion to Import substitution:

From Export Promotion to Import substitution:. Comparative Experience of China and Mexico Mehdi Shafaeddin Director: Global Vision (Training & Consultancy) Affiliated to the Institute of Economic Research, University of Neuchatl, Switzerland. The QUESTIONS.

beyla
Télécharger la présentation

From Export Promotion to Import substitution:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. From Export Promotion to Import substitution: Comparative Experience of China and Mexico Mehdi Shafaeddin Director: Global Vision (Training & Consultancy) Affiliated to the Institute of Economic Research, University of Neuchatl, Switzerland

  2. The QUESTIONS • What is the experience of China and Mexico in export processing? • Why is China more successful than Mexico • Can the experience of China be replicated? In two papers

  3. Outline • The literature • Performance of trade, MVA & GDP • Performance of Processing Industries • Conclusions:Prospects for the future

  4. The literature • Import Substitution and Export Promotion as Alternative Strategies • The process of MS & Prebisch’s thinking • MS as prerequisite to EP • Common Argument: Emphasize on learning • MS: Learning by doing • (outward-orientation )EP: Transfer of knowledge & Tech. • Opening up: imitation; catch-up opportunities; innovation • Differences • MS: need for Gov. intervention • EP: Hands off

  5. Critiques of MS,EP • Contribution to Learning: not much in either case • MS: often discouraged learning; • Reasons; lack of efficient Gov. policies • exceptions • EP: did not appreciate internal conditions for learning: • Simply exporting is not sufficient • Learning is not automatic • Gov policies required

  6. Literature (2):Productive Power (PP) and Learning • List: mental capita as main source of PP • Role of socio-economic factors • Importance of gov. Policies in industrial learning and education ; • external economies of learning • Others :Arrow, Linder;Fellner: role of experience • Capability Building Theory • Role of tech. capability in a broad sense • Market failure • Need for intervention • Test of Impact of FDI: Experience of Costa Rica/ Ireland

  7. Mexico &China :Similarities & differences • Similarities: • Opening up to trade; FDI and processing • Difference: performance: (table 1) • Growth of Xman. • Trade balance • FDI; national I • MVA;GDP (graph 1) • Trade in Parts (table 1.a

  8. Table 1.a:Trade in Parts and Components: Manufactured Good; China and Mexico -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1992/3 2003/4 China :Value($b) Exports 3.2 58.4 Imports 9.8 44.6 Balance -6.57 13.8 Shares : Components/total X: 6.3 17.6 Mexico:Value($b) Exports 6.8 26.3 Imports 13.8 33.8 Balance -7.5 -7.5 Shares : Components/total X: 20.2 23.9 Meomo: balance of man. trade ($b): China -5.8 125.2 Mexico -17.8 -1.7

  9. Performance of Maquila sector Mexico

  10. Performance of Maquila and non-aquila:1

  11. Processing trade of China: Evolution

  12. What are the prospects for increasing value added in assembly operation of China and Mexico? Evolution of pattern of CA RCA indices: Rx= [Xij/Xj]: Xwi/Xw]; Rm = [M ij / Mj ]  [ M wj / Mw ]; Cr= (Change in R)/R Prospects for the Future

  13. China: RCA in X • Choice of about 30 products=64% of X • RCA in almost all • 13 capital/tech. intensive; mostly elect. • 14 L intensive • Gain RCA (increase in Cr) in K/T, particularly elect. • Loss in Cr in most L intensive • So good prospects for X; BUT? How about production?

  14. China: RCA & M:ComponentsAssembly Operation or Production? • Choice pf products: 30: 67% of M • Intermediate/components:19; bulk of M • Comparative advantage in assembly in all components: except automobile • Advantage in assembly increased in most cases • However in 4 cases (of components) adv. In production increased • How about finished good?

  15. China: RCA & M: Finished productsProduction? • Increase in adv. In production of: • Telecommunication equipment • Specialized machinery • Textiles and leather machinery • Aircraft • Machine tools for working metals • Passenger cars

  16. Mexico: RCA: X • Choice of products : similar to China • Mexico exports higher no. of K/T intensive products than china(18 out of 29) • Automotive &elect. 25 % of X • Gained adv. On components of auto. &data processing • Lost adv. In X on 11 K/T intensive finished goods • How about assembly operations?

  17. Mexico: RCA: MProduction? • Paperboard the only intermediate product (out of 13)with adv. in production; but adv. In assembly increased! • Finished goods: advantage in production in: • Automotive • Data processing Examine these cases

  18. Auto. &data processingProspects Exports Imports R Rc R Rc 1.Office machines and auto.data processing: Finished products: 751 0.63 0.45 0.44 0.42 752 2.076 3.677 0.91 1.48 Components: SITC 759 0.801 1.438 1.277 3.612 2.Automotive products: Finished products: 781 1.518 0.991 0.672 5.366 782 4.231 3.388 1.08 3.81 783 1.58 20.34 0.25 0.19 Components 784 1.7 1.1 2.32 3.66

  19. Conclusions China Mexico Question?

More Related