1 / 45

Byung Duk Song, Jonghoe Kim, and James R. Morrison*

Towards Real Time Scheduling for Persistent UAV Service: A Rolling Horizon MILP Approach, RHTA and the STAH Heuristic. Byung Duk Song, Jonghoe Kim, and James R. Morrison* Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering KAIST, South Korea Thursday, May 29, 2014. Presentation Overview.

bikita
Télécharger la présentation

Byung Duk Song, Jonghoe Kim, and James R. Morrison*

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Towards Real Time Scheduling for Persistent UAV Service: A Rolling Horizon MILP Approach, RHTA and the STAH Heuristic ByungDuk Song, Jonghoe Kim, and James R. Morrison* Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering KAIST, South Korea Thursday, May 29, 2014

  2. Presentation Overview • Motivation • Goal and ideas • Mathematical formulation • Solution approaches: STAH & RHTA • Numerical examples • Concluding remarks

  3. Presentation Overview • Motivation • Goal and ideas • Mathematical formulation • Solution approaches: STAH & RHTA • Numerical examples • Concluding remarks

  4. Motivation • Increasing demand for commercial small size UAVs • Applications: Patrol, tracking, communication relay, environmental / fire / national boundary monitoring, cartography, disaster relief • Limitations: Flight time & mission duration • Long duration, multiple customers and persistent service require - Collection of UAVs, refueling stations, automatic operation system - Methods to orchestrate their operations

  5. Motivation: Application Example (1) • Example 1: Tracking a moving ground target Station 1 Station 3 Station 2

  6. Motivation: Application Example (2) • Example 2: UAV border patrol Station 1 Station 2

  7. Presentation Overview • Motivation • Goal and ideas • Mathematical formulation • Solution approaches: STAH & RHTA • Numerical examples • Concluding remarks

  8. Goal and Ideas • Provide uninterrupted UAV service with continuous appearance of mission requests (or unanticipated system state changes) ■Goal ■Ideas • Persistent UAV operation via service stations • Real time service perspective: • - Incorporate current UAV information (location, fuel level) • - Efficient solving algorithms • Uninterrupted customer service

  9. Presentation Overview • Motivation • Goal and ideas • Mathematical formulation • Solution approaches: STAH & RHTA • Numerical examples • Concluding remarks

  10. Mathematical Formulation: Assumptions ■Assumptions 1. Moving target’s path and location at specific times are known. • 2. Current location and fuel levels are known. 3. Recharge time for a UAV depends on the remaining fuel(battery) amount 4. UAV travel speed is constant

  11. Mathematical Formulation: Split Job ■Split job: Moving objective path is divided into set of split jobs Service station 2 UAV 2 Job 1 Start UAV 2 5 8 1 9 6 7 4 10 2 UAV 1 End UAV 1 3 ▪ Objective moves - From point (50,250) to (950,350) - From 13:10 to 13:20 Service station 1

  12. Mathematical Formulation: Notation ■Notation

  13. Mathematical Formulation: Notation ■Notation ■Decision Variables ▪ Xijkr = 1 if UAV k processes split job j or recharges at station j after processing split job i or recharging at station i during the rth flight; 0, otherwise • ▪ Cikr is job i’s start time by UAV k during its rth flight or UAV k’s recharge start time at station i; • otherwise its value is 0. • ▪ qkr is total fuel (battery) consumption amount for UAV k during its rth flight

  14. Mathematical Formulation ■Mathematical formulation Network flow & job assignment

  15. Mathematical Formulation Start time constraints Fuel constraints Decision variables

  16. Formulation Demonstration (CPLEX) ■Problem description : Problem map Customer 1 Customer 2  Station ▲ UAV S3 U6 U2 U5 U1 S1 U4 U3 S2

  17. Formulation Demonstration (CPLEX) ■Problem description : Split job & station & UAV information

  18. Formulation Demonstration (CPLEX) ■Result of example 1 - Objective value : 662.570 - CPU time: 5.42 seconds

  19. Formulation Demonstration (CPLEX) ■Result of example 2 : Change qk,ini - Objective value : 809.067 - CPU time: 9.17 seconds

  20. Formulation Demonstration (CPLEX) ■These examples shows us - Real time perspectives: Current location and fuel level of UAVs - Access to the persistent service - Sharing of multiple stations

  21. Formulation Demonstration (CPLEX) ■Computational limit of CPLEX Needs for alternative solution approaches to achieve real time perspective

  22. Presentation Overview • Motivation • Goal and ideas • Mathematical formulation • Solution approaches: STAH & RHTA • Numerical examples • Concluding remarks

  23. Solution Approach: Solution Properties ■Analysis on solutions 1) Strict condition: Feasibility issue - Fuel - Split job start time 2) Flexible condition: Solution quality issue - Total moving distance - The number of split jobs which UAV can serve in that flight - Trade off between direct & indirect flight

  24. Solution Approach: Solution Properties ■Analysis on solutions 3) Sequential assignment of split jobs

  25. Solution Approach: Solution Properties ■ Trade off between direct and indirect flight < Direct flight > 5 8 1 9 6 7 4 10 2 UAV 1 3 Service station 1 • Without replenishment • Short moving distance • Serve less number of split jobs

  26. Solution Approach: Solution Properties ■ Trade off between direct and indirect flight < Indirect flight > 5 8 1 9 6 7 4 10 2 UAV 1 3 Service station 1 • Replenishment on the station • Long moving distance • Serve more number of split jobs

  27. Solution Approach: STAH ■Based on the analysis of solutions 1) Strict condition 2) Flexible condition Assign UAVs which satisfy strict conditions (Ajk) Contribution value of direct and indirect flight VD(k) = {αw( # of split jobs) –(1-α)(total moving distance) }∙Ajk VI(k) = {αw( # of split jobs) –(1-α)(total moving distance) }∙Ajk Select the flight which provide highest value From customer 1 (earliest customer), split jobs are assigned sequentially

  28. Solution Approach: RHTA ■ Receding horizon task assignment algorithm (RHTA) • Classical heuristic (petal algorithm) for vehicle routing problem • Iterative IP model • Generate good quality feasible solution in short time • Classical RHTA was modified: • Eliminate the resource selection components • Modify the equation of replenishment time for a UAV

  29. Solution Approach: RHTA ■ Petal : Sequence of split jobs to be served by a UAV • Step 1: Enumerate all feasible petals for each UAV k • Generate petal • Check feasibility of petal • Evaluate of petal value Fuel limitation Time window

  30. Solution Approach: RHTA • STEP 2: Solve a single IP to select petal • STEP 3: Assign split job of selected petal to UAVs • STEP 4: Send exhausted UAVs to a service station - if there are remaining jobs on the list, go to STEP 1. • STEP 5: Send any UAVs not located at a station to a station Minimize total travel distance A job can be processed by at most one UAV At least P job should be selected

  31. Presentation Overview • Motivation • Goal and ideas • Mathematical formulation • Solution approaches: STAH & RHTA • Numerical examples • Concluding remarks

  32. Results for Various Problem Sizes ■Results • STAH and RHTA obtain very near optimal values. • CPLEX issues an out of memory error. • STAH and RHTA derive feasible solution in a reasonably short time.

  33. Real Time Operation with New Service Request Arrival ■During the UAV service of example 1, new service request arrived at T=10. ■Remaining jobs and UAV information at T=11.

  34. Real Time Operation with New Service Request Arrival

  35. Real Time Operation with New Service Request Arrival T = 18 10 11 12 19 14 15 16 17 13 8 7 4 6 9 5 Customer 3 Station 3 Customer 1 Station 1 Station 2 Customer 2

  36. Presentation Overview • Motivation • Goal and ideas • Mathematical formulation • Solution approaches: STAH & RHTA • Numerical examples • Concluding remarks

  37. Concluding Remarks • Fleets of UAVs conducting missions over a field of operations can achieve persistence - Supported by shared service stations distributed over the field - Real time operation to handle new arrival of service request • MILP scheduling model - Allows a mobile robot to perform persistent service by sharing base for energy resupply - Maximize service quality by serving 100% service requests by orchestration of components - Demonstration of real time perspectives • Develop a efficient heuristics to overcome computational limit of MILP formulation - STAH - RHTA • Application & numerical examples

  38. Back-UP Materials

  39. Solution approach: STAH • STEP 1: Arrange customers in the non-decreasing order of (first) split job start time • Let P= {1,2,…,p} be the set of customers and Pt be the set of split jobs in customer index t • Element of Pt also arranged according to the non-decreasing order of split job start time. Set P=1. • STEP 2: From customer P, split jobs are assigned to the UAVs. • Calculate VD(k) and VI(k) • Among VD(k) and VI(k) for every UAV, the biggest function value and corresponding UAV schedule is selected • STEP 3: Update parameters • Current location, fuel level, available time of UAVs • Remaining split job information for customer P is updated ■STAH procedure

  40. Solution approach: STAH • STEP 4: Repeat step 2 to 3 until every split job is assigned to UAV in customer P. • STEP 5: Set P=P+1, and repeat step 2,3 and 4. This step is repeated until P=|P|+1. • STEP 6: Send any UAVs not located at a station to a station ■STAH procedure

  41. Solution approach: STAH ■Pseudo code (STAH)

  42. Solution approach: RHTA ■ Petal : sequence of split jobs to be served by a UAV • Step 1: Enumerate all feasible petals for each UAV k • Generate petal (Limitation of maximum size of petal) • Check feasibility of petal • Evaluate value of petal Fuel limitation Time window

  43. Solution approach: RHTA • STEP 2: Solve a single IP for all UAVs to minimize the travel distance • Select petals to be used subject to Minimize total travel distance A job can be processed by at most one UAV At least P job should be selected

  44. Solution approach: RHTA • STEP 3: Assign split job to UAV • Assign UAV to a first split job of selected petal • Update system state (UAV location, fuel, available time and job information) • Remove assigned job from remaining job list • STEP 4: Find exhausted UAVs • Send UAVs that do not have any feasible petals to a service station • Update system state • Return to STEP 1 if remaining job list is not empty • STEP 5: Send any UAVs not located at a station to a station

  45. Solution approach: RHTA ■Pseudo code (RHTA)

More Related