1 / 137

Interest Rate Risk Management Elias S. W. Shiu Department of Statistics & Actuarial Science

Interest Rate Risk Management Elias S. W. Shiu Department of Statistics & Actuarial Science The University of Iowa Iowa City , Iowa U.S.A. Frank M. Redington , F.I.A. “Review of the Principles of Life-Office Valuations” Journal of the Institute of Actuaries

billie
Télécharger la présentation

Interest Rate Risk Management Elias S. W. Shiu Department of Statistics & Actuarial Science

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Interest Rate Risk Management Elias S. W. Shiu Department of Statistics & Actuarial Science The University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa U.S.A.

  2. Frank M. Redington, F.I.A. “Review of the Principles of Life-Office Valuations” Journal of the Institute of Actuaries Volume 78 (1952), 286-315

  3. Last sentence in the first paragraph: The reader will perhaps be less disappointed if he is warned in advance that he is to be taken on a ramble through the actuarial countryside

  4. Last sentence in the first paragraph: The reader will perhaps be less disappointed if he is warned in advance that he is to be taken on a ramble through the actuarial countryside and that any interest lies in the journey rather than the destination.

  5. For a block of business and for t > 0, let At = asset cash flow to occur at time t (= investment income + capital maturities)

  6. For a block of business and for t > 0, let At = asset cash flow to occur at time t (= investment income + capital maturities)For example, if the company’s assets consist of one 2-year bond with face value of $100 and semi-annual coupons at a nominal annual rate of 6%

  7. For a block of business and for t > 0, let At = asset cash flow to occur at time t (= investment income + capital maturities)For example, if the company’s assets consist of one 2-year bond with face value of $100 and semi-annual coupons at a nominal annual rate of 6% and one 3-year bond at 8%

  8. For a block of business and for t > 0, let At = asset cash flow to occur at time t (= investment income + capital maturities)For example, if the company’s assets consist of one 2-year bond with face value of $100 and semi-annual coupons at a nominal annual rate of 6% and one 3-year bond at 8%, then A0.5 = ½ (6+8) = 7

  9. For a block of business and for t > 0, let At = asset cash flow to occur at time t (= investment income + capital maturities)For example, if the company’s assets consist of one 2-year bond with face value of $100 and semi-annual coupons at a nominal annual rate of 6% and one 3-year bond at 8%, then A0.5 = ½ (6+8) = 7, A1 = 7, A1.5 = 7

  10. For a block of business and for t > 0, let At = asset cash flow to occur at time t (= investment income + capital maturities)For example, if the company’s assets consist of one 2-year bond with face value of $100 and semi-annual coupons at a nominal annual rate of 6% and one 3-year bond at 8%, then A0.5 = ½ (6+8) = 7, A1 = 7, A1.5 = 7, A2 = 103+4 = 107

  11. For a block of business and for t > 0, let At = asset cash flow to occur at time t (= investment income + capital maturities)For example, if the company’s assets consist of one 2-year bond with face value of $100 and semi-annual coupons at a nominal annual rate of 6% and one 3-year bond at 8%, then A0.5 = ½ (6+8) = 7, A1 = 7, A1.5 = 7, A2 = 103+4 = 107, A2.5 = 4, A3 = 104

  12. For a block of business and for t > 0, let At = asset cash flow to occur at time t (= investment income + capital maturities)Lt = liability cash flow to occur at time t (= policy claims + policy surrenders + expenses  premium income)

  13. Let A = Asset Value at time 0. Then,

  14. Let A = Asset Value at time 0. Then, But yield curves are not (necessarily) flat.

  15. Let A = Asset Value at time 0. Then, But yield curves are not (necessarily) flat. Generalize: Then

  16. Similarly, let L = Liability Value at time 0. Then,

  17. Similarly, let L = Liability Value at time 0. Then, Surplus (Net Worth or Equity) = Asset Value - Liability Value = A - L

  18. Similarly, let L = Liability Value at time 0. Then, Surplus (Net Worth or Equity) = Asset Value - Liability Value = A - L Instantaneous interest rate shock: How does the surplus change?

  19. Instantaneous interest rate shock means

  20. Instantaneous interest rate shock means Assume that the asset cash flows {At} and liability cash flows {Lt}do not change as interest rates fluctuate.

  21. Instantaneous interest rate shock means Assume that the asset cash flows {At} and liability cash flows {Lt}do not change as interest rates fluctuate. That is, there are no embedded interest-sensitive options.

  22. Instantaneous interest rate shock means Assume that the asset cash flows {At} and liability cash flows {Lt}do not change as interest rates fluctuate. That is, there are no embedded interest-sensitive options. The more general case of interest-sensitive cash flows is a much harder problem.

  23. Changed asset value is

  24. Changed asset value is Changed liability value is

  25. Changed asset value is Changed liability value is Changed surplus is S* = A* - L*

  26. Question: How will the surplus not decrease?

  27. Question: How will the surplus not decrease? A - L  A* - L*?

  28. Question: How will the surplus not decrease? A - L  A* - L*? Define two (discrete) random variables X and Y: Pr(X = t) =

  29. Question: How will the surplus not decrease? A - L  A* - L*? Define two (discrete) random variables X and Y: Pr(X = t) = Pr(Y = t) = (The cash flowsare assumed to be non-negative.)

  30. Define the function f(t) =

  31. Define the function f(t) = Then

  32. Define the function f(t) = Then

  33. Define the function f(t) = Then

  34. Define the function f(t) = Then

  35. Similarly, L* = L E[f(Y)].

  36. Similarly, L* = L E[f(Y)]. Original Surplus is S = A - L.

  37. Similarly, L* = L E[f(Y)]. Original Surplus is S = A - L. Changed Surplus is S* = A* - L* = AE[f(X)] - LE[f(Y)].

  38. Similarly, L* = L E[f(Y)]. Original Surplus is S = A - L. Changed Surplus is S* = A* - L* = AE[f(X)] - LE[f(Y)]. Now, assume A = L, i.e., assume S = 0.

  39. Similarly, L* = L E[f(Y)]. Original Surplus is S = A - L. Changed Surplus is S* = A* - L* = AE[f(X)] - LE[f(Y)]. Now, assume A = L, i.e., assume S = 0. Then S* = A{E[f(X)] -E[f(Y)]}

  40. Similarly, L* = L E[f(Y)]. Original Surplus is S = A - L. Changed Surplus is S* = A* - L* = AE[f(X)] - LE[f(Y)]. Now, assume A = L, i.e., assume S = 0. Then S* = A{E[f(X)] -E[f(Y)]}, and S*  0 if and only if

  41. Similarly, L* = L E[f(Y)]. Original Surplus is S = A - L. Changed Surplus is S* = A* - L* = AE[f(X)] - LE[f(Y)]. Now, assume A = L, i.e., assume S = 0. Then S* = A{E[f(X)] -E[f(Y)]}, and S*  0 if and only ifE[f(X)] E[f(Y)].

  42. f(t) =

  43. f(t) = In the Redington (1952) model, it = i and = i + , where is a positive or negative constant.

  44. f(t) = In the Redington (1952) model, it = i and = i + , where is a positive or negative constant. Thus f(t) is an exponential function, which is a convex function.

  45. f(t) = In the Redington (1952) model, it = i and = i + , where is a positive or negative constant. Thus f(t) is an exponential function, which is a convex function. In the Fisher & Weil (J. of Business 1971) model, where c is a positive constant.

  46. f(t) = In the Redington (1952) model, it = i and = i + , where is a positive or negative constant. Thus f(t) is an exponential function, which is a convex function. In the Fisher & Weil (J. of Business 1971) model, where c is a positive constant. That is, f(t) = ct

  47. f(t) = In the Redington (1952) model, it = i and = i + , where is a positive or negative constant. Thus f(t) is an exponential function, which is a convex function. In the Fisher & Weil (J. of Business 1971) model, where c is a positive constant. That is, f(t) = ct, which is also a convex function.

  48. Jensen’s Inequality

  49. Jensen’s Inequality: E[f(X)]  f(E[X]) for all convex functions f.

More Related