1 / 11

Jeff Jackson Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alabama

Electrical and Computer Engineering Capstone Design Experience at The University of Alabama: Challenges, Improvements and Future Directions. Jeff Jackson Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alabama. Outline. Introduction ABET program educational objectives

blade
Télécharger la présentation

Jeff Jackson Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alabama

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electrical and Computer Engineering Capstone Design Experience at The University of Alabama: Challenges, Improvements and Future Directions Jeff Jackson Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alabama

  2. Outline • Introduction • ABET program educational objectives • Transitioning to a two semester design course sequence • Curriculum changes to accommodate design course changes • Handling co-op and out-of-phase students • Funding and corporate involvement • ECE Advisory Committee role in capstone design • Current and future design project examples • Questions

  3. ABET Program Outcomes Assessed in Capstone Design • B. Design & conduct experiments, analyze & interpret data • C. Design a system, component, or process to meet needs • D. Function on multi-disciplinary teams • E. Identify, formulate, solve engineering problems • F. Professional and ethical responsibility • G. Communicate effectively • H. Broad education necessary for global and societal context • I. Need, and an ability to engage in life-long learning • J. Knowledge of contemporary issues

  4. Current Status • One semester design course • One course administrator and one technical advisor per design team • Heavy burden • Typical preliminary and critical design reviews “merged” into a single, mid-term, design review • Fragmentation of design process with “soft” skills coverage • Far removed from previous ethics, society and other “soft” skills coverage in the curriculum • Hard to incorporate meaningful “soft” components, at least early in the design process • Largely a time constraint

  5. Transitioning to a Two Semester Capstone Design Sequence • Making the transition seamless? • Must teach at lest one additional iteration of single course design, in parallel with two course design sequence • Course administrator’s role in second course may be minimal • Second level manager role • Coordination necessary to reduce probability of conflicting advise • Two semester design • More accurate industrial flow • Preliminary and critical design reviews • Incorporate more design review before design is fixed • Breakpoint between courses will be at the preliminary design review (or later) • Still under consideration

  6. Handling Co-op and Out-of-phase Students • Each capstone design course will be taught each term • Increases faculty load • Co-op students will be allowed to participate • Remotely • Option to join a new design group for second course experience • +/- in both cases

  7. Curriculum Changes to Accommodate Capstone Design • Based, in part, on student input • Part of full curriculum emphasis on “hands on” design • First capstone design course will be co-requisite with an ECE senior lecture/lab combination • Second capstone design course will have first capstone design course and ECE senior lecture/lab combination as prerequisites • IE203 – Engineering Economics will be deleted from ECE curriculum • Engineering Economics coverage will now be in the first of the two capstone design courses

  8. Funding and Corporate Involvement • Funding for capstone design teams is currently set at $500 per three student design team • Larger teams generally have a larger budget • Larger teams also introduce more test and integration issues • Department funded from engineering student equipment fee • Paid for by corporate donations • Some corporate sponsors are heavily involved in projects • Project definition, participation in design reviews and other presentations • Primary motivation: Students to hire after graduation • Corporate sponsors also have recruiting and/or IEEE events scheduled • New capstone design lab paid for by corporate donation from Bellsouth

  9. ECE Advisory Committee Involvement • ECE Advisory Committee meetings are scheduled to coincide with final capstone design presentations • Provides one external source of design evaluation • Provides one additional opportunity for students to meet with potential employers • Students have a chance to represent department • A good motivator for students and faculty alike

  10. Current Design Project Examples

  11. Questions?

More Related