1 / 27

CPR: Duration and Outcome

CPR: Duration and Outcome. Jack P Freer, MD Professor of Clinical Medicine Daniel J Miori MS, RPA-C Palliative and Ethics Millard Fillmore Gates Daniel Sleve, M4. CPR. Unique —high stakes, life or death, stark Abrupt —must be refused in advance Standardized —routine, ACLS protocol

blanca
Télécharger la présentation

CPR: Duration and Outcome

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CPR: Duration and Outcome Jack P Freer, MD Professor of Clinical Medicine Daniel J Miori MS, RPA-C Palliative and Ethics Millard Fillmore Gates Daniel Sleve, M4

  2. CPR • Unique—high stakes, life or death, stark • Abrupt—must be refused in advance • Standardized—routine, ACLS protocol • Universal—potential use: everyone • Iconic—represents promise and misuse of modern technical medical capabilities

  3. CPR Decision Making • Presumption to treat • No decision=consent to CPR • Documentation regulated

  4. Reasons to Use CPR • Benefits > Burdens • It’s good to be alive! • Burdens trivial by comparison • Desperation

  5. Reasons to Refuse CPR(consent to DNR) • Little empirical data in literature • Theoretical construct • Tomlinson T. Brody H. Ethics and Communication in Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders.NEJM(1988) 318:43-6 • NYS DNR Law • Symbolism • Cynical view

  6. Reasons to Refuse CPRTomlinson & Brody • No Medical Benefit—Futile • Poor Quality of Life after CPR—CNS damage, life support etc • Poor Quality of Life before CPR—It’s NOT good to be alive

  7. Reasons to Refuse CPR • Patient is Dying—”Dying” causes cardiac arrest (not other way around) • Poor Quality of Life after CPR— Clinical determination (+ pt/surrogate) • Poor Quality of Life before CPR — Patient/surrogate assessment

  8. NYS DNR Law (c) A surrogate may consent to an order not to resuscitate on behalf of an adult patient only if there has been a determination by an attending physician with the concurrence of another physician selected by a person authorized by the hospital to make such selection, given after personal examination of the patient that, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty:

  9. NYS DNR Law • the patient has a terminal condition; or • the patient is permanently unconscious; or • resuscitation would be medically futile; or • resuscitation would impose an extraordinary burden on the patient in light of the patient's medical condition and the expected outcome of resuscitation for the patient.

  10. Symbolic Nature of CPR • Icon of aggressive care—both good and bad • Full code = fighting back • DNR = giving up

  11. Symbolic Nature of CPR • Patient/Family Attitude—doubtful that patient/family who wish full code really accept reality of fatal illness • Physician/Staff Attitude—presence of DNR order implies desire for less aggressive treatment in other realms

  12. DNR and non-CPR Care • Physician/Staff Attitude—presence of DNR order implies desire for less aggressive treatment in other realms • Beach MC, Morrison SR, The Effect of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders on Physician Decision-Making. J Am Geriatr Soc (2002) 50:2057–2061,.

  13. DNR and non-CPR CareBeach and Morrison • Physician survey • 3 Clinical vignettes • 2 Versions of each • One with DNR • Other no DNR • Sequential treatment decisions

  14. DNR and non-CPR CareBeach and Morrison

  15. Reasons to Refuse CPR Cynical • Because the physician approaching the patient/family thinks it’s a good idea and persuades the decision maker • Gory details (“break your ribs”) • Often no mention of survival/outcome data

  16. Rational Approach Choudhry NK, Choudhry S, Singer PA.CPR for Patients Labeled DNR: The Role of the Limited Aggressive Therapy Order. Ann Intern Med (2003) 138:65-68. • Presumes people make DNR decisions based on probability of poor outcome with CPR. • Overlooks high-yield circumstances (relatively good outcomes with CPR): • Witnessed “shockable” rhythms • CPR in OR • Iatrogenic/procedures

  17. Rational Approach • Witnessed “shockable” rhythms • CPR in OR • Iatrogenic/procedures Choudhry: • LATO order: Limited aggressive therapy; • Intermediate status. • Unwieldy Short Code.

  18. Code Duration and Outcome • Variety of outcome measures • Restoration of spontaneous circulation • Survival at 24 hours • Survival to discharge • Variety of timeframes • < or > 5, 10, 15, 20 min • Ranges (5-10, 11-15, 16-20 etc) • Mean CPR time among survival

  19. Short Code • Allows patient to avoid outcomes of prolonged code • Eliminates generalizing DNR to other decisions • NOT a sham code ( “slow code,” “show code”) • NOT a partial code (“CPR but DNI”) • Go all out—but for less time • No confusion in initiating code • No confusion in running of code • No confusion in ending code

  20. Cooper & Cade 1997

  21. Millard Gates 12/06 – 12/07

  22. Survived Procedure

  23. Survived 24 Hours

  24. Survived to Discharge

More Related