130 likes | 256 Vues
This report discusses a simulation scenario involving three robots designed to survey a defined area for emergencies, represented as red color objects. These behavior-based robots employ a random walk, coordination, area bounding, and emergency detection methods to effectively cover their environment. Key components include the development of a Koala robot, which integrates various sensors, and communication protocols for multi-robot coordination. The report summarizes current findings and outlines future work, focusing on enhancing fault tolerance, maximizing the detection capabilities, and adapting to real-world measurement constraints.
E N D
Meeting report NTU CSIE Adviser:Prof. Jane Hsu Speaker :Wen-Chieh Fang 2005/09/21
Agenda • Simulation Scenario • Behavior-based Reactive Paradigm • Problem description • Robot model • Random walk • Coordination • Area bounding • Emergency detecting • Demo • Summary and future work
Simulation scenario • Surveillance task:Three robots on their area to survey emergency(red color object) • Robots are behavior-based(random-walk, coordination, area bounding,emergency detecting)
SENSE PLAN ACT Behavior-based Reactive Paradigm • Vertical decomposition of tasks
Problem description • Project:ITRI plan • Problem:Multi-robot coordination • Assumption: • Robots are homogeneous • Robots can communicate without lost information • Robots have no model/knowledge of other robots • Robots have no ability of self-localization
Robot model • Koala robot::Highly modular, all terrain indoor robot • Sensors:16 Infra-red proximity and ambient light sensors • Accessories:a camera, an Infra-red ground proximity sensor Adopted from: http://www.cyberbotics.com
Random walk • Algorithm: Braitenberg vehicle approach • Feature: • Relying on the chances to find targets • Different from complete approach to canonical clean-floortask (mainly for stationary targets) Random walk Back & forth Adopted from [Acar et. al. 2003]
Coordination • Messaging • “inhibition” message • State • none → “commitment” state • Assumption • At most two robots tackle the same emergency
Area bounding • Each robot is equipped with an distance sensor below the base of robot. • There are landmarks on the bounding of surveillance area
Emergency detecting • Device:Camera • Assumption:we use stationary red colorobjects in place of emergencies such as intruders or fire.
Summary & future work • Make devices such as camera, emitter and receiver accord with the physical models in real world (for example: device size, measurement constraints or limits). • In the random walk algorithm, extend the behaviors that maximize the distance between adjacent robots so that the robots have more chances to find the emergencies. • Fault tolerance or uncertainty problems such as communication lost, sensing noise etc. • Search multiple moving targets. • Mission support:remainders can change their surveillance area to compensate the lacking of committing robots.
Reference • [Acar et. al. 2003] Ercan U. Acar, Howie Choset, Yangang Zhang, and Mark Schervish, “Path Planning for Robotic Demining: Robust Sensor-based Coverage of Unstructured Environments and Probabilistic Methods “, The International Jounal of Robotics Research, Vol. 22, No. 7-8, July-August 2003, pp. 441-466.