1 / 27

HLab meeting Status report

HLab meeting Status report. T.Gogami 13/Sep/2011. 12 /Mar/2011 CNN News in D.C . Contents. CH 2 & H 2 O Λ issue ¼ σ Λ (CH 2 ) = σ Λ (H 2 O) Develop Tracking code. Experimental setup of JLab E05-115. p( e,e’K + )Λ,(Σ 0 ). Experimental setup of JLab E05-115. p( e,e’K + )Λ,(Σ 0 ).

iain
Télécharger la présentation

HLab meeting Status report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HLab meetingStatus report T.Gogami 13/Sep/2011 12/Mar/2011 CNN News in D.C.

  2. Contents • CH2 & H2O Λ issue • ¼ σΛ(CH2) = σΛ(H2O) • Develop Tracking code

  3. Experimental setup of JLab E05-115 p(e,e’K+)Λ,(Σ0)

  4. Experimental setup of JLab E05-115 p(e,e’K+)Λ,(Σ0) HES e’ Splitter Magnet HKS K+

  5. Analysis process HES HKS tracking tracking JLab E05-115 p(e,e’K+)Λ,Σ0 x , x’ , y , y’ at Reference plane x , x’ , y , y’ at Reference plane ~40 hours (5 shifts) Very preliminary F2T function F2T function x’ , y’ , p at Target x’ , y’ , p at Target particle ID (select K+) Missing Mass tune tune p : Λ , Σ0 ,12ΛB Angle : Sieve slit

  6. Multiplicity of typical layer of chamber HES HKS ~1.13 ~2.24 ~4.94 ~1.28 Multiplicity is high for HKS

  7. Hit wires in KDC1 KDC1 Overhead view Overhead view Misidentification chance in hit wires selection increase ! low high low high REAL DATA REAL DATA Black : hit wires Blue : selected wires Red : track Black : hit wires Blue : selected wires Red : track CH2 52Cr

  8. Basic tracking procedure Real data 52Cr target CH2 target Good TDC High multiplicity Pattern recognition Black : hit wires Blue : selected wires Red : track KDC1 Solve left right Select good combination Combination selection with TOF counters Reduce hit wire combinations (h_tof_pre.f) Track fit

  9. New tracking scheme • Hit wire selection with TOF • 1X & 2X • Grouping • Pre-PID • Cherenkov detectors Good TDC みそ High multiplicity Pattern recognition Reduce hit wires to analyze Solve left right Select good combination Combination selection with TOF counters Reduce hit wire combinations (h_tof_pre.f) Track fit

  10. DC hit info. selection with TOF (xx’) Just applied to xx’-layers for test Gravity CUT Particle direction ~17% Selective region Maximum gradient ~8% CUT Minimum gradient Procedure in “h_dc_tofcut.f” Get KTOF1X & 2X hit counter information Make combination of 1X and 2X hit counter if those two are in same group (grouping) Determine cut conditions on KDC1 & KDC2 Select Hit wires in KDC and Reorder them

  11. Check works of the code Gravity • GREEN region Selective region • RED markers Selected hit wires • BLACK markers Rejected hit wires Particle direction Seems to work well

  12. Results of TOF cut withgrouping Residual before after CH2 , 2.0 [μA] , 76315 Same σ 150 [μm] σ 150 [μm] Multiplicity CH2 , 2.0 [μA] , 76315 x’ x’ x x Shift ~1.2 ~2.3

  13. Apply to u,v-layer v v’-layer Selective region determined by 1X and 2X Applied to uu’ and vv’ layers , too. Convert xx’-layer

  14. Check works of the code KDC1 KDC2 v v’ v v’ uu’ uu’ • GREEN regionSelective region • RED markers & linesSelected hit wires • BLACK markers & lines Rejected hit wires particle particle x x’ x x’

  15. Results of TOF cut withgrouping (all layers) Residual before after CH2 , 2.0 [μA] , 76315 σ 150 [μm] σ 150 [μm] Same Multiplicity • Multiplicity of uu’vv’-layers • CH2 • ~20% reduction • 52Cr • ~5-10% reduction

  16. Results of TOF cut withgrouping (all layers) CH2 TOF cut works well Faster ! Increase ! 52Cr Faster ! 52Cr Increase ! Parameters ?

  17. DC hit info. selection with TOF Stricter TDC cut Gravity CUT Particle direction ~17% Selective region Maximum gradient ~8% CUT Minimum gradient

  18. Results of Introduction new code CH2 Increased ! 52Cr Increased !

  19. Summary • CH2 & H2O Λ issue • Improvement of tracking code • ¼ σ(CH2) = σ(H2O) ==> ½ σ(CH2) = σ(H2O) • Virtual photon flux calc. • efficiency

  20. End

  21. Multiplicity improvement history Applied TDC cut Multiplicity went down ! • Analysis time • 20% reduction for 52Cr • Number of Kaon (RUN:77124, 52Cr) • 56  70  90  130 DC TOF cut Matrix DC TOF cut ‘ (TDC cut)

  22. Result of TOF cut withgrouping Original code KDC allowance select Pure Selective region allowance With “h_dc_tofcut.f” Optimal allowance Number of K+ ~2[%] up Good tracks hid by background appear ! Too strict

  23. Experimental setup of JLab E05-115 Position, angle e’ K+ Position, angle

  24. Experimental setup of JLab E05-115 Position, angle e’ Momentum vector K+ Position, angle

  25. Experimental setup of JLab E05-115 JLab E05-115 p(e,e’K+)Λ,Σ0 ~40 hours (5 shifts) Missing Mass Very preliminary Momentum vector

  26. KTOF TDC • Cut 10000 – 50000 (Current) 18000 – 20500 (New) Run 76314 for CH2 target Run 77124 for 52Cr target

  27. Data Summary JLab E05-115 (2009/June – 2009/Nov)

More Related