1 / 19

HLab meeting

HLab meeting. 10/14/08 K. Shirotori. Contents. SksMinus status SKS magnet trouble Magnetic field study. Introduction. Hypernuclear production via the (K - , p - ) and ( p + ,K + ) reaction ⇒Scattered p - and K + are analyzed by the magnetic spectrometer, using SKS. Analysis method

duff
Télécharger la présentation

HLab meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HLab meeting 10/14/08 K. Shirotori

  2. Contents • SksMinus status • SKS magnet trouble • Magnetic field study

  3. Introduction Hypernuclear production via the (K-,p-) and (p+,K+) reaction ⇒Scattered p- and K+ are analyzed by the magnetic spectrometer, using SKS. Analysis method : Runge-Kutta calculation from the position of drift chambers and the precisely measured magnetic field map

  4. SKS magnet problem One of the SKS magnet coil was broken by the high voltage test. (It cannot be repaired… ) Effects to experiments • Strength of filed : 5/6 (2.7 T⇒2.5 T @ 395A) ⇒Decreasing acceptance and momentum resolution • Change of filed shape ⇒Tracking and absolute momentum value The innermost part of the coil

  5. Study Calculated field maps are compared with the measured map. Simulation • Scattered particles tracks generated with calculated maps (as a true magnetic filed) are analyzed by the measured map or calculated map. Real data analysis • Real experimental data (KEK E566 data) are analyzed by calculated maps.

  6. Simulation

  7. Simulated conditions Particles generation in the simulation • p- of 1.4 GeV/c with uniform scattering angular distribution up to 20 degree • No multiple scattering Analysis of simulated data • Tracking by using the hit positions of drift chamber • Drift chamber resolution ~400 mm

  8. Magnetic field map • sksmap395a.dat (measured,) • Measured 395A magnetic field map • SksQM4S395AFullC.dat (QM4F) • Calculated field map • Full coil version • SksQM5S395AFullC.dat (QM5F) • Calculated field map • Full coil version • Different B-H curve from QM4F QM4 Fis used as generated map in the simulation.

  9. Field map and particle tracks Measured Calculated(QM4) Particles pass the incomplete magnetic filed map region, but they are rejected and there are no large effects.

  10. z y ● ● x Meaning of observables • P : Momentum • U0 : angel (dx/dz) of production point • V0 : angle (dy/dz) of production point (x,y,z belong local coordinate) y Local coordinate (In) z x Local coordinate (Out)

  11. Calculated(QM4F)⇒measured : U0,V0 QM4F→QM4F QM4F→measured • Large difference • P vs U0, 2nd polynomial shape • P vs V0, tracks near the SKS magnet coil gap • Momentum resolution : 1.7 MeV/c⇒2.4 MeV/c (to select good region) • Tracking c2~1.6 (1.0 original)

  12. Calculated(QM4F)⇒calculated(QM5F) : U0,V0 QM4F→QM4F QM4F→QM5F • Large difference • P vs U0, little 2nd polynomial shape • P vs V0, almost flat • Momentum resolution : 1.7 MeV/c⇒2.3 MeV/c (no correction) • Tracking c2~1.0 (1.0 original)

  13. QM4F→Measured : P vs U0 Measured QM4F Particles passing the circled region have large difference between measured and calculated map.

  14. Analysis

  15. Analysis method To analyze E566 data : (p+,K+) reaction data • Correlation by measured map (sksmap272a.dat) • Correlation by calculated map • Target thickness : 12C (3.4 g/cm2) (Resolution is determined by the target) To check Missing mass (binding energy) vs u0 Missing mass (binding energy) vs v0

  16. Measured map (sksmap272a.dat) After correction Before correction • U0 vs MM : 1st+2nd polynomial correlation • V0 vs MM : 2nd polynomial correlation ⇒Momentum resolution : 2.8 MeV (After correction) Correction coefficients U : -0.012*U-0.01*U2 V : +0.05*V2

  17. Calculated map (SksQM12S272AFull.dat) After correction Before correction • U0 vs MM : 1st+2nd polynomial correlation • V0 vs MM : 2nd polynomial correlation ⇒Momentum resolution : 3.1 MeV (After correction) Binding energy offset : -4 MeV Correction coefficients U : -0.012*U-0.01*U2 V : +0.05*V2

  18. Correlation shape Correlation shapes are almost same between all maps. • BE vs u0(dx/dz) : strong 1st+2nd polynomial correlation (The correlation becomes larger to the inner tracks.) • BE vs v0(dy/dz) : small 2nd polynomial correlation • Offset : less than 10 MeV (Absolute value of magnetic field : ±1%) U0 vs MM : 1st+2nd polynomial correlation V0 vs MM : 2nd polynomial correlation

  19. Summary Study • Simulation • Generated by calculated map ⇒ Analyzed by measured or calculated map • Check the correlation between momentum and scattering angle ⇒To check the difference of absolute values and angles • Real data analysis @ 272A map • E566 thin 12C target data analyzed by measured or calculated map • Check the correlation between binding energy and scattering angle ⇒ Correlation shapes are almost same between all maps. ⇒ The correlation can be corrected. For the experiments • High resolution experiments • To correct the correlation by many binding energy data • How to determine the absolute value ? • Coincidence experiment (Hypernuclear g-ray spectroscopy, weak decay) • The correction is almost enough to select the binding state. (Momentum resolution is not need to be so high)

More Related