1 / 12

Self-Organizing Potential Field Network: A New Optimization Algorithm

Self-Organizing Potential Field Network: A New Optimization Algorithm. Lu Xu and Tommy Wai Shing Chow TNN, Vol.21 2010, pp. 1482–1495 Presenter : Wei- Shen Tai 20 10 / 10/20. Outline . Introduction Background SOMA Self-Organizing Potential Field Network Simulations and results

bozica
Télécharger la présentation

Self-Organizing Potential Field Network: A New Optimization Algorithm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Self-Organizing Potential Field Network:A New Optimization Algorithm Lu Xu and Tommy WaiShing Chow TNN, Vol.21 2010, pp. 1482–1495 Presenter : Wei-Shen Tai 2010/10/20

  2. Outline • Introduction • Background • SOMA • Self-Organizing Potential Field Network • Simulations and results • Analysis of SOPFN algorithm • Conclusion • Comments

  3. Motivation • Most optimization algorithms • Individuals only learn from the best candidate solution even it is far from the global optimum. • They explores a larger search space, but at the expense of convergence rate.

  4. Objective • A new optimization algorithm • Each candidate solution can effectively reach the optimum in low search space and computation complexity.

  5. Background • Self-organizing migrating algorithm (SOMA) • Updates every individual by a “migration loop” to generate a series of candidate solutions. • Particle swarm optimization (PSO) • At each time step, every particle moves toward the direction of the best position among all particles’ previous positions. • Self-organizing and self-evolving neurons (SOSEN) • Each neuron evolves using SA and cooperates with other neurons by a self-organizing operator. • Search space is enlarged by multiple neurons to enhance the convergence rate for finding the optimum.

  6. Self-organizing potential field strategy • The cooperation behavior is a self-organizing procedure that the neurons subjected to the winning neuron’s neighborhood are trained. • The competition behavior models the network as a potential field similar to the vector potential field used in mobile robot.

  7. Self-organizing potential field network algorithm • Initialization • Randomize the initial weights of M × N neurons. • Construction of the Potential Field • Target neuron • Obstacle neuron • 1-D Weight Updating • For every neuron i, randomly choose an integer k ∈ [1,D]. • Self-adaption: reassignthe target neuron c and obstacle neuron r. • Stop when stopping criteria are satisfied, go step 3 otherwise.

  8. Cooperative and Competitive Behaviors of SOPFN

  9. Simulations and results

  10. Analysis of SOPFN algorithm

  11. Conclusion • SOPFN • A new evolutionary algorithm that models the search space as a self-organizing potential field. • In the competitive behavior • The target and obstacle neurons are found to speeds up the convergence rate and increases the probability of escaping from the local optimum. • In the cooperative behavior • The winner’s neighboring neurons are updated to generate new weights at each generation.

  12. Comments • Advantage • This proposed model is feasible for effectively finding the optimum in low computational complexity but high convergence speed. • The search space is constrained in a fixed neural network and the candidate solution can be more abundant by self-organizing potential field strategy. • Drawback • The number of map size is a crucial factor for determining the search space and computational complexity. Nevertheless, the performance comparison of different map size was not discussed in this paper. • Application • Optimization problems

More Related