1 / 11

CECOMM Conference 2010

Deaccession and Disposal of Museum Objects. CECOMM Conference 2010. Janneke Hermans Ph.D. Curator Telecommunication Technologies Museum voor Communicatie, The Hague, The Netherlands 15 November 2010. Content . Deaccession procedures in the Netherlands;

bracha
Télécharger la présentation

CECOMM Conference 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Deaccession and Disposal of Museum Objects CECOMM Conference 2010 Janneke Hermans Ph.D. Curator Telecommunication Technologies Museum voor Communicatie, The Hague, The Netherlands 15 November 2010

  2. Content • Deaccession procedures in the Netherlands; • Case of deaccession telephones in Museum voor Communicatie.

  3. Why Deaccession? Overrepresentation; Broken; Health/environmental risks; Collection mobility and visibility; Nation of origin/original context; Treatment is finished; Substitution; Knowledge incomplete; Replaceability. Improvement quality collection; Not museum quality; Change in collection policy; Usage; Isolation; Lack of interest; Decreasing administrative burdens; Duplicate objects;

  4. 4 phases of Deaccession • Preparation • Selection • Relocation • Rounding off project

  5. Tools selection criteria • Use collection plan; • Deltaplan criteria (1990): • > A: Irreplaceable and indispensable objects or sub-collections: • verification value, linkage value, symbolic value; • > B: Objects and sub-collections with high presentation/attraction value, genealogical value, ensemble value and documentation value; • > C: Objects or sub-collections that fit the museums mission statement but do not meet the A and B criteria; • > D: Objects or sub-collections that never should haven been inventoried.

  6. Tools for disposal • www.herplaatsingsdatabase.nl • Relocation database set up by Dutch Institute for Cultural Heritage • www.haaleenstukjemuseuminhuis.nl • eBay, ‘obtain a piece of a museum’ - Auction House

  7. Deaccession telephones • 1975: Legacy mr. H.G. Broos • Containing around 1700 objects, mostly telephones. • Most was inventoried. • Around 450 telephones not inventoried.

  8. Physically brought together

  9. Selection criteria - Homogeneous group of objects, no known contextual information; • Do we already have it? • If not: is it a valuable addition to our collection (rare type, used in the Netherlands) • If yes: could we use a second specimen or a better equipped one?

  10. Disposal • Description and tagging of 471 telephones • Auction House • Various telephones per lot • Exception for rare telephones

More Related