1 / 12

L2 Muon Trigger Status Report: L2 seeding study

L2 Muon Trigger Status Report: L2 seeding study. B. de la Cruz , C. Diez (CIEMAT, Madrid) Muon HLT Meeting 17th April, 2009. L2 seeds reminder. Parameters from L1 muon candidates converted into seeds for L2 muon reco  pt estimated at interaction point

brick
Télécharger la présentation

L2 Muon Trigger Status Report: L2 seeding study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. L2 Muon Trigger Status Report: L2 seeding study B. de la Cruz , C. Diez (CIEMAT, Madrid) Muon HLT Meeting 17th April, 2009 Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez

  2. L2 seeds reminder • Parameters from L1 muon candidates converted into seeds for L2 muon reco  pt estimated at interaction point  global position (, ) of hit at second station (MB2/ME2) firing L1 • A TSOS (L2 trajectory seed) is defined at the second station with this previous info and some initial errors assigned. • Great care needed, as info is not given at the same reference system • At this point, L2 pattern recognition starts  Track parameters from seed propagated to innermost reachable muon chamber  Forward pattern reco: navigation outward  Bacward pattern reco: navigation inward MB4 MB3  MB2 MB1 ,  pt Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez 2 24-Sep-14

  3. Motivation for the study L2 Muon Trigger is already established but there may be still room for improvement optimizing the 2 step algorithm: • Pattern Recognition in the muon system and the tuning of the L2 parameters. http://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?contribId=2&materialId=slides&confId=53973 • Study the L2 Seeding • Vector values : Evaluate pt, h, f at IP and second station • Errors : Study L1 resolution, compared to the default errors given in the seeding Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez

  4. Tests on L2MuonSeedGenerator • /RelValZMM/CMSSW_3_1_0_pre3_STARTUP_30X_v1/GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW-HLTDEBUG (9000 evts) Rerun the trigger with the configuration which is implemented for CMSSW_3_1_X • Change L2 seed in RecoMuon/L2MuonSeedGenerator /src/L2MuonSeedGenerator.ccand check results comparing distributions of several variables (pt, eta, phi), their pulls and resolutions. Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez

  5. Comparison: variablesat Vtx-MB2 SimTracks (vtx)-SimHits(MB2) • At simulated level: Compare simulated pt, h, f given at the interaction point and in the second station (ZMuMu sample) Firstapprox.: shift in pt by a constant ~2 GeV (CSC), ~3 GeV (DT), Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez

  6. Comparison pt Vtx-MB2 SimTracks (vtx)-SimHits(MB2) pt vtx-MB2 vs pt(at vtx) • Check the distributions for the available “RelValSingleMuPt1000” • more bremmstrahlung losses at high Pt as expected No statisticsfor Pt > 60-70GeV Muon pt=1000GeV Pt vtx-MB2 vs h (at vtx) Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez

  7. Changed pt seed: Effect in L2 distribution Someexamples of pulls, Pt resolutionafterrerunningthe L2 triggerwiththe new seeds FastStepHelix + Refitwith default pt seed • The effect is negligible (~0.3% in pt resolution) • It doesn´t seem worthy to further parametrise the shift (for this sample ZMuMu at least) Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez

  8. L2 seed Errors Default Errors: • Are theyoverstimated? • Check L1 resolution (L1 vs sim.) and takethosevalues as seed error Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez

  9. L1 resolution Resolution (L1-simulated) : p/pt, L, f Error(q/pt)=0.25 /pt (1/GeV) Error(L)=0.02 rad Error(f)=0.03 rad 1.5 times smaller for CSC 2 times smaller ~10 times smaller Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez

  10. Effect in L2 distributions: Pulls No ReFit • Same number of entries • Sigma changes by less 0.1% • Notseenanyremarkableeffect: Justtocheckseeifthischangeactuallyaffects at all, we removed the “refit” (rightplots) • Theeffectis a bit more visible, butstillnotimportant Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez

  11. Effect in L2 distributions: Resolution • Comparing resolution for the “default seeds”, changed pt and pt+new error estimation : • Theresolutionimproves a bit for pt and h, notforf, withthe “pt corrected” • Changingtheseedsaffectsspeciallyh Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez

  12. Summary • Changes in the seeding with the L2 optimizations (FastSteppingHelixPropagator (bigger extrap. steps), Refit to the L2 muon track) do not affect significantly the resolution (in pt, , ) nor the pulls. • The errors studied don´t seem to be “too overestimated” • For the CMSSW_3_1_X release the useful samples are only RelVal samples (ZMM, SingleMu) available, not so big statistics, relatively small pt range available • Would it make sense to use other samples where there could be more muons, not back to back, etc? Ie. Min bias or pp->mu+X? Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez

More Related